Gun Control : Unethical And Ineffective

A good argument must be logical and issue, the premises, and the conclusion must be coherent and complementing each other. And with the endeavor to analyze the validity of an argument the article, “Stop the insanity: Ban guns,” by Gerald Ensley has been reviewed. In this article Ensley has emphasized on the primary issue of banning guns in the United States, and especially handguns (“Stop the insanity: Ban guns”, 2015). Another issue which has been emphasized on is proper background checking before handing over a gun license to an individual (Ensley, 2015). To justify his argument the author has provided some specific premises. Primarily Ensley has cited as premise about the shootings at the Florida State University, the shootings in a northwest

Many people in the United States believe that ¨ [They] need a president who will stand up for the rights of hunters, sportsmen, and those seeking to protect their homes and their families¨ (Romney). America needs somebody to stand up their Constitutional rights rather than disregarding them. United States citizens need to be allowed to use weapons, so long as they can control usage and know how to properly. Although some people believe guns are used for nefarious purposes, it is clear that guns in the United States should not be banned because of rising gun safety, the minute amount of illegal weapons, and the symbolic right to posses firearms.

"A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (Right 1). This is what is written in the second amendment of the American constitution, which is part of the bill of rights. So how can the U.S. Federal Government decide to ignore the American constitutional right and decide they can take away the guns of American citizens? The Democratic party, founded by Andrew Jackson, has changed over the years. The ideals of this party originated as the party of the people since it protected the rights of ordinary Americans. In 2016, the party has changed completely because Democratic leaders such as President Barack Obama

“Someone’s right to have a gun,” says Joanna Wallace, “Took away my right to have a son.” (white book pg 25). Gun control is a growing problem and a nationwide tragedy. It has overpowered our society, due to the way individuals perceive the pros and cons of carrying a deadly weapon at all times. However, the policy of gun control is a procedure that must be passed by legislative sessions with many votes before confirming it to become a law. Even though owning a dangerous weapon can be used for protection and self-defense, the fact of the matter is ownership of a gun can lead to accidents, deaths, and crimes; ultimately, guns should be used only in certain situations if needed.

Mass-shootings — defined by the FBI as four or more murders occurring during the same calamity, with no distinctive time period between the homicides (Serial Murder) — have stricken across the United States at the rate of about one every two weeks since 2006 (Database of Mass Shootings, 2006-2013). This abysmal statistic has rightfully triggered much debate concerning gun restraints. The theory of gun control pertains towards any efforts intended to regulate, define, or limit the possession, production, sales, and use of guns. Since its conception, the Second Amendment — guaranteeing the “right to bear arms” — has been wildly controversial. Gun control advocates suggest that confining gun ownership would reduce the number of violent

Gun violence has become a big obstacle in America and needs to be interrupted. 36,252-gun correspondent deaths were in the year 2015. There is an article from the Washington Post expressing about gun violence. The article mentions the New York Times took a survey of the citizens of the United States on according to what they think the US should counteract gun violence. People that wanted background checks was 86%, license for guns 78% agreed, and not letting people with violent criminal backgrounds 83% people requested that. In 1991, Democrats and Republicans said people essentially need to get a permit from the police before obtaining a gun. Out of the republicans, 57% want people to attain permits from the police. The fundamental ways to stop gun violence would be a background check, and acquire a state license. People with violent background that have to do with a crimes should not experience having guns, as said in the article. There was a test done in the article, US Public Opinion, showing out of the 50,000 people that took the survey said guns should overall not be in public places. There survey was about the location people should use guns. In some components of the US people can carry guns in public places confiding on where in the public a citizen is transporting the gun. In Newtown, Connecticut there was twenty children and six adults shot at a school. In Aurora, Colorado, James Holmes shot seventy people in one of the movie theaters. In Tucson, Arizona, eighteen people were shot by Jared Loughner. The concept these shooters had in common was they all had a downbeat mental illness. These shooters had

This article describes why the main problem in the U.S isn’t Gun laws, the main problem is the people who own guns. It then goes on to quote the Sandy Hook Homicide, and suggestions the president should do in order for gun violence to decrease. It gives a view that opposes gun control by saying that the president should be more strict against those who own a gun. This also offers facts and suggestions about gun laws. This will be a useful source because it opens more on gun violence than gun laws and how the U.S should interpret people who own guns in the U.S. Although it provides one person's view, it does show specific facts and recent crimes to show that person’s view.

“From the 1999 school shooting at Columbine that left 13 dead, to the recent shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School that left 26 dead, many people have been shocked by these horrific events and have searched for ways to end them. The answer is simple: more regulations regarding gun control” (Clypian). The stakes are rising in the policy debate on gun control due to the many mass shootings which have occurred throughout the country. While some people believe that more laws regarding gun control will not help because criminals ignore laws, this is incorrect. Gun control is not directed toward innocent gun holders but is intended to take action against the idea of gun violence. Steps should be taken to reduce access to weapons by the

Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. The Columbine and Virginia Tech Massacres were horrible, senseless tragedies that killed more than 40 people and wounding 50. Incidents like these demand attention, but the focus has been on the wrong problem. Gun control is an important issue, one that has caused much controversy over the decades. America’s first impulse in any crisis is inevitably to call for immediate, remedial legislation. School shootings and media emphasis have people demanding the government place harsher controls on guns. These demands are projected further when children are injured or killed in accidents involving guns, but many households that possess guns do not have accidents like these. Also, much of the current gun legislation remains unenforced. The second amendment grants the right to bear arms, which cannot be infringed upon. Harsher laws will not completely stop the ability to obtain a gun. What is needed are easier, more organized registration methods and better reporting procedures. Concentration should be on the values and morals of our citizens, the role the media plays in glorifying violence, and the lack of respect for law. Also, it is imperative that an emphasis is placed on gun education. Knowledge not laws, are the key to gun safety.

With the occurrence of mass shootings in America, gun control has seemingly become a heated and controversial topic among Americans. Should guns be legalised or prohibited to prevent further damage to the community? The concerns and impact of guns on America are reviewed in three articles which could proof that owning guns do not necessarily inflict escalating crime rates (Bogost, 2016; Davidson, 2015; Kates and Mauser, 2007). Prohibiting gun ownership rights is not the solution to ensure the safety of the people. The positive outcomes and drawbacks on the availability of firearms in America will be discussed in this literature review.

Transitioning focus onto the next global issue, we’ll sharpen the lens and focus in on the United States. Gun violence has been a “condition” felt by America for decades, and yet there lacks any concrete policy to help alleviate the number of undue deaths that occur every time there is a mass shooting, much like the one that occurred in Las Vegas on October 1, 2017. In 2012 alone there were over a dozen mass shootings (DeGrazia, 2014). Unsurprisingly, the list goes on. In the United States, possessing firearms is grounded in the Constitution’s second amendment, guaranteeing citizens the right to bear arms. One thing to consider is how far this amendment should be allowed to extend. Morally and legally, people should be allowed handguns in order to protect themselves; this is the one of the most plausible reasons for owning guns (DeGrazia, 2014). This is concrete in the Constitution, so we will assume for our purposes that individuals have the right to own guns. However, where is the line drawn for self-defense? While there may not be a finite answer to this question, we will explore what type of policy should be set in place in order to address this advancing problem. The background for gun rights is supported by the Supreme Court, as well as incredible amounts of Americans, so it is unlikely that this sentiment will change in the near future (DeGrazia, 2014), thus other routes must be explored in terms of treating gun violence in the United States.

Gun control has dominated the political scene for the last five years ever since the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut where twenty-six children and teachers were shot up by a mentally ill shooter. Yet, it seems that every shooting since then has met the same reaction by politicians, thoughts, and prayers, which has enraged many of the victims’ families of major shootings including Las Vegas, San Bernardino, and many other occasions (Bernstein). Yet, the issue of gun control seems taboo for gun rights advocates and certain lobbies including the National Rifle Association which has literally blocked any attempt for regulation on guns to be passed due to the assumption of unfettered rights under the Second Amendment (Meckler et al, 2014). However, the approach currently being taken by Congress is not sustainable because it will lead to more deaths due to lack of background checks, the issue of mentally ill and felons able to fall through the cracks, and the issue that there are more regulations on things like cars, airplanes, and medicine yet for something that kills 36,000 people a year there seems to be an issue of dealing with it (Meckler et al, 2014). On the other side of the argument, there is a concern for total government overreach on the issue, the issue of states’ rights in terms of developing gun policy, and the potential issues of people being prevented to buy guns when they should legally be able to do so. Both sides make convincing arguments, but we must explore

The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. Gun results in tens of thousands of deaths and injuries annually. In 2017, there were exactly 277 gun violence cases that caused death of more than four individuals. And just a week ago, a massive shooting happened in Las Vegas, which caused fifty more dead, and two hundred more hurt. This is the largest terrorist attack since 9/11, and the murderer is one sixty-four years old man with guns. Gun control once again at forefront of discussion following this tragedy. Many critics think it is necessary to control the number of guns that flow into the market, and they believe this will be an efficient way to stop these tragedies from happening, but there are voices in the society saying that guns don’t kill people, people do. They believe if a person wants to commit a murder, he could use weapons other than guns, so preventing guns will not stop the murder from happening, and people would not have the chance to defense themselves when facing danger. Personally, I think gun control is necessary, and it will defiantly make society a safer place, and reduces the chances of tragedies.

November 5th, 2017, 26 people were killed in a church in Texas. The shooter, identified as Devin Kelley, was armed with an assault rifle and opened fire in a small Texas community church. In the wake of the Texas shooting, the topic of gun control has once again arisen to the front pages. In recent years, too many parents, too many siblings, and too many friends have experienced a fear similar to this. The idea of America being a safe place has been shattered by the increasing amount of gun violence. According to the BBC, more Americans have died in the last 50 years from gun violence than have died in every war from the Revolutionary War to Iraq. Easy access to guns has created turmoil in the lives of American citizens. Mass shootings at schools, theaters, concerts, and other public places have occurred more often in the past decade than ever before. Criminals and citizens with mental illness have access to guns due to gun shows and the lack of background checks. Some states are leaving their citizens in a vulnerable condition by not enforcing background checks.

The United States stands alone as the most well protected country in the world. With about 300 million guns, no other nation comes close. By comparison, India, with a population of over 1 billion people, has the next highest number of firearms at 46 million. These American guns, which are enough for every person in the U.S., are meant to protect citizens from harm. In the past 50 years, however, the safety net supposedly provided by the millions of firearms in America has translated to the highest gun homicide rate of any high-income country—by 25 times (Newman). Additionally, 385 mass shootings, or one third of the worldly total, took place in the U.S. in 2016. The statistics are stacked against the Second Amendment, which states, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” but the statement is also where the problem begins. Because the Right to Bear Arms is written in the Constitution, people feel obligated to own guns and oftentimes take advantage of the laws to purchase several powerful weapons. It only takes one of those people to be a shooter to create another great American tragedy. Restrictions to buy guns in the U.S. have become more lenient over recent years and as a result, the number of mass shootings has dramatically risen. At the same time, other countries have tightened restrictions on firearms and have witnessed the opposite result. Stricter background checks, a reinterpretation of the Second Amendment, and time for a gun-obsessed