Gun Control is NOT the Answer to Juvenile Crime Essay example

If gun control is regulated, then we will have less crime. Access to firearms makes killing easy, efficient, and impersonal, which increases the lethality of crime. Josh Sugarmann, the Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center has once said, "We recoil in horror and search for explanations, but we never face up to the obvious preventive measure: a ban on the handy killing machines that make crimes so easy.”Allowing untrained people to carry guns puts others at risk and it can result in self-inflicting injuries both by suicide and unintentional incidents. Gun violence in America kills more than 30,000 and injures almost 70,000 each year. Guns can be misused and abused, which is why gun

The only thing that will reduce crime, is dealing with the crime, not the guns.

Should the mere fact that criminals committing crimes with the use of guns infringe the national right of the innocent to possess guns. This is a question that arouses everywhere and no matter which way it is viewed the controversy will always go on. "A gun is a mere tool that can be used for good or evil. Our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proven to be otherwise."(Harris p.2) This means that only a few people are committing crimes with uses of guns and why completely remove them from society. Therefore, we should strenuously protect the rights of free men and likewise prosecute and punish the criminals who abuse the rights of others. The problem with gun violence is associated with the child's

A majority of the American people feel that gun control laws will help reduce crime rates because the waiting period would allow time for a person’s temper to cool down. They also feel that gun control will prevent repeat offenders because when a person tries to purchase a handgun, he will have to fill out a lengthy questionnaire. The questionnaire will include questions about the buyer’s past, for example, if they have a criminal record or a record of any mental illness. If there is a criminal record in that person’s history, he will not be able to make the purchase. Restricting handgun ownership would also reduce crime, because guns are used most often in robberies and murders (Mayer 28). They are very easily concealed under a coat, or even in the waistband of pants.

The amount of crimes happening today will only increase with stricter gun control laws because there is a higher temptation to steal guns. An American citizen claims, “Ever since I first learned how to shoot, the issue with gun violence around the nation became clear: Guns are not the problem; people are” (Sherfenski). Police need to lock up these people committing the disastrous crimes that affect so many innocent lives. These blameless people are not prepared when they are being attacked, and that is because most shootings tend to happen in areas where guns are controlled. The former United States Secretary of Education, William Bennett, explains the reason that criminals decide to go to places that have controlled gun laws is because: “These murderers, while deranged and deeply disturbed, are not dumb. They show up to schools, universities, malls and public places where their victims cannot shoot back” (Bennett). Even if guns are controlled in public places including malls and schools, where there are uncontrolled shootings, why would it make a difference if they were controlled everywhere? It would not make a difference whatsoever because these crimes are done out of pure, revolting pleasure. Committing a crime is one thing, but taking away a right that was given to Americans in the 1790s is a whole different story.

Banning guns will not keep the number of deaths and crimes down. Just because there is a law put in place dose not mean everyone will follow it .For instance if a gun law was made all the criminals would still have guns .That leaves us law

Banning handguns will not decrease the crime rate in America. There are so many illegal handguns on

But I think statistics make a strong case that guns don’t create the problem, rather they help to counteract it. Instead of tougher gun laws, perhaps what we need are tougher criminal laws! The day that criminals and would-be murderers know that they will pay the ultimate price for their crimes, that’s when we will see a real decline in gun crimes. These days, law-breakers know there’s a good chance some slick criminal defense lawyer will get them off on a technicality or an insanity plea. They think they’ll “get away with murder”!

Gun violence is violence committed with the use of a gun (firearm or small arm). It may or may not be considered criminal. Criminal gun violence includes homicide (except when and where ruled justifiable), assault with a deadly weapon, and suicide, or attempted suicide, depending on jurisdiction. Non-criminal gun violence may include accidental or unintentional injury or death. Included in this subject are statistics regarding military or Para-military activities, as well as the actions of civilians? Many guns are owned for legitimate reasons, and most are not misused.. Globally, millions are wounded through the use of guns. Levels of gun violence vary greatly among geographical regions, countries, and even sub nationally. The United States has the highest rate of gun related deaths per capita among developed countries, though it also has the

Are all these bans and laws really necessary? ‘’The nine European nations with the lowest rate of gun ownership have a murder rate that is three times higher than the nine European nations with the highest rate of gun ownership’’(Snyder, Michael. N.p., 12 Aug. 2013. Web. 26 Mar. 2015), I think guns are actually helping us, overall guns are used eighty times more to prevent crimes rather than used in them. ‘’In the United States about 200,000 women protect themselves against sexual assault using guns every year.’’(Snyder, Michael. N.p., 12 Aug. 2013. Web. 26 Mar. 2015). The city of Kennesaw,Georgia passed a law requiring every home to have a gun in it and over a course of about twenty years after the law was passed "their crime rate dropped by more than fifty percent and

In the United States there are many issues under hot debate. Some people are so set in their belief on a subject that they won’t even consider an opposing argument. Gun control is third on the list of subjects in which people are not willing to listen to the opposition’s argument. One side of the gun control argument is that we need more gun control. The opposing side says we don’t need stronger laws, or we need fewer laws. My stand on the argument is that we do not need stronger gun control laws. The thesis of this paper will focus on the argument against tougher gun laws. The anti thesis will focus on the opposition’s belief that there should be stronger gun control laws. Finally, the synthesis will focus on refuting the

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of gun ownership on crime rates within a population. In the United states Gun ownership is at an all-time low. The percent of households owning one or more guns went from 42 percent in 1993 down to 31 percent in 2014 (Smith & Son, 2015). As gun owner ship has shown a steady decline in ownership, so has crime over the years. According to the UCR (2010), from 1993 to 2012 violent crime rates per 100,000 have gone from 747.1 to a low of 747.1. While correlation does not equal causation and there are far too many variables to even count, these statistics give a base to where the nation is at as a whole on gun ownership and crime. To find the true answer, a closer look will be had specific cities

Many people think that guns and crime is not a serious problem in the United States or other countries. Also, many people are thinking that there are no connection between guns and crime. However, guns and crime have important connection. Also, guns and crime is important issue in the United States America and other country such as South Korea. Nowadays, you can watch or hear news about guns and crime a lot for every day and everywhere.

Any debate on crime needs to focus on crime prevention and not the guns of law abiding citizens. Controlling guns is not a crime prevention strategy, it only prevents the those who are physically weaker than their attackers like women, elderly, and disabled from defending themselves against bigger, faster and stronger aggressors.

Taking guns off the street isn’t going to do anything. Drugs are illegal, yet they are all over the street. For example, Washington D.C or Chicago, they have stricter gun laws there and crime has