Gun Laws Pros And Cons

The debate over gun control has been raging through the American political systems for years. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession. Pro-gun control activists

What gun control laws are going to help stop mass shootings? Even if the government banned the sale of assault rifles and guns in general,people with bad intentions are going to purchase them illegally. In the three recent mass shooting that caused many deaths, the shooters got their guns illegally with no trace of the sale on these weapons. Sandy Hook,Columbine,and San Bernardino were all mass shootings where the shooters got their guns illegally, stole the gun from family members or other people, and caused a lot of danger and harm to people. There would be no regulations to stop them because even if there were stricter gun laws, they still would be able to purchase their guns illegally.Stricter gun laws will not prevent crime,people will still get illegal firearms,and no sales to the public will reduce revenue.

Any activity that would make it obvious that a certain person can’t obtain a gun can be seen with a background check. To clarify, “Don Macalady, member of Hunters against Gun Violence, stated, "As a hunter and someone who has owned guns since I was a young boy, I believe that commonsense gun legislation makes us all safer. Background checks prevent criminals and other dangerous people from getting guns” ( "Gun Control - ProCon.org"). Background checks should be a necessity when purchasing a gun. This would prevent the mentally ill from getting their hands on a gun. Most mass shootings are from the gunman having a mental illness. Background checks also allow insight on any criminal records, allowing potential criminals to not get their hands on a gun. Another reason gun legislation should be put into place is it would lower the cost of taxpayers. No gun violence would lead to mo hospital visits with expensive medical bills. This means taxpayers would pay less money for those medical expenses. For example, “In 2010, there were 36,341 emergency room visits and 25,024 hospitalizations for gun injuries, costing an estimated $6.3 million. 84% of those injured by firearms are uninsured, leaving taxpayers responsible for most of those bills through programs like Medicaid” (“Gun Control - ProCon.org”). Creating gun control laws would decrease the amount of money the U.S spends on gun violence accidents. Taxpayers pay more when there is more gun violence in the United States with the costs of insurances and all the hospital visits. No more gun violence would mean less hospital expenses dealing with it. Thus, keeping background checks as a necessity and putting more restrictions on guns protects citizens from harm and keeps more money in their

There have been many highly publicized gun-related incidents, such as the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, that have renewed that call for even stricter gun control measures for both politicians and members of the media. The push for greater controls on firearms is bad policy with regards to the protection of our rights as U.S. citizens, our safety from those mean us harm, and the maintenance of an important economic market for providing legal firearms for both sport and protection. Rather than making gun ownership harder for law abiding U.S. citizens, we should be more aggressively enforcing the gun-related laws currently in place, while looking for ways to make legal gun ownership less complicated and burdensome. This will help protect the constitutional freedoms of future generations while making us safer now.

Gun Control has been a controversial issue in the United States for a long period of time. There are two sides to this debate, the pro-gun lobbyist who believe they should have the right to exercise the 2nd Amendment right which states that the Federal Government does not have the right to infringe the people from keeping and carrying a firearm. The Anti-gun lobbyist wants stricter run regulation or even ban gun sales all together. This essay will be analyzing the laws regarding gun regulations through the history of the United States. The essay will also look into the 2nd Amendment rights while also giving it a definition. This essay will also be analyzing some of the more important Supreme Court cases in which the ruling of the Supreme Court

Congress, do not pass this bill! Smart guns are not any more effective at curbing violence than non-smart guns. Even if they would prevent some future catastrophes, they will also cause future catastrophes! These guns will cause more problems than they solve, and the negative results will be detrimental to the American people. Anything managed by software will have vulnerabilities; systems are hacked all the time. If this happened with the gun regulation system, it would make things infinitely easier for criminals, while possibly preventing the average American from defending himself. Even without anyone hacking the software, many reasonable circumstances would also prevent someone from defending himself. For example, what if multiple

In the United States alone, thirty-nine percent of the citizens have at least one gun stored in their household, under the rights of the Constitution. Not long ago, there was a mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada that caused a state of worry around the nation and made many people to second guess the laws we have currently. Gun violence has been getting out of hand and an outrageous number of people want to change the gun control laws but changing laws about guns won’t stop people from using them and more illegal activity will be going around in our country.

Background: There are people in this world who will find a way to get revenge on someone even if it means breaking the law. Shooters will be able to find gun access wherever they can. There are also other people who don’t always use guns in an incorrect manner, like self defense. Lastly, the second amendment states that we are allowed to own weapons and that the government can’t take it away.

This essay will be based on the opinions of people supporting the idea that gun laws should be banned. Understanding the idea of, if guns weren't allowed to be purchased then no one from the shootings would have been harmed. If guns were just removed then the problems today would be resolved. If we protest nad have walk outs then we can prove our point as a society. In the Lord of the Flies, Ralph in known as a leader and someone who believes that there do need to be rules in order to contain man. Rules do need to exist in order for a society to know there limits, without them the world would be mad. I can understand those that believe its the weapon itself fault but if you set any kind of weapon in the center of a table, will it cause harm?

Making and passing strict gun-control laws will not make our nation safer nor more protected by no means. Did you know there was a study published in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy proving that nations that have more guns tend to have less crime? Gun controls laws are too cruel. People should be aloud to obtain guns. Gun-related crime has been depleting in recent years, gun control laws discourage the right to self defense and even the second amendment proves this.

Innocent people are killed by guns every day. Gun laws go way back and have helped but havent helped enough. A lot of the mass shootings have to do with large assault rifles resulting in high capacity magazines which do a lot more harm. It's repulsive to what its capable of. There needs to be extensive background checks on all citizens to make sure they are not going to harm another human being. The death rate by guns needs to go down and if not it will just keep going up. Everyone is living in fear these days and It's because of guns.

However, the idea of stricter gun laws should only apply to automatic assault weapons because they are overpowered and more harmful that the regular standardized guns that individuals can purchase in a store. For those who do not understand the difference between standard guns and assault weapons, standard guns are guns such as pistols, shotguns, and rifles that fired one bullet or round at a time after you pull the trigger, but assault weapons are guns that you can hold on the trigger and it fires nonstop until you let go of the trigger. Many people think that military-style weapons such as automatic weapons are illegal, but they are actually legal in the United States. Several decades ago, military weapons were banned when the Federal Assault

Gun control in the United States usually refers to a group of laws that affect a citizen's right to own and or carry a firearm of some type. The jurisdiction of these laws is a very con topic in the United States. The citizens are passionate about both sides of the issue. This makes establishing laws very difficult because there is an abundance of information that must be considered. Gun control is a very controversial topic with a vast amount of information accompanying it.

Gun issues have been a series of hot topics for the U.S public since guns have been legally used in the civil war. Own guns indicates that Americans have rights to protect their home by themselves. However, as guns are legally existed in Americans’ lives, gun-violence become a serious issue which we cannot ignore. By the Gallup poll for the gun, it states that 54% Americans would like to vote the candidates make the gun issues to be a major issue. Gun control in laws should be more strict and specific on gun sellers and gun owners to make our lives be more safer.

There are no advantages to gun control; however, there are numerous negatives that I can think of, such as more crime occurs when guns are restricted. Statistics prove that towns, which have made it easier for gun ownership, have very low crime rates. Criminals will always have guns therefore gun control only limits those who are law-abiding citizens from the ability to protect themselves, and keep their family safe. The fact is that that criminals will always find a way to get their hands on a gun legally, or illegally so we should stop worrying about banning guns. Look at the two biggest gun control cities in the Unites States: Chicago and D.C., they also happen to have the highest crime rate. The same