HIPAA Case Study Answers

employer, professional regulatory body, and the law for an unwarranted breach of confidence, it is essential that any disclosure of information is done appropriately within the requirements of the duty owed to the patient” (Griffith, 2015, p.358). The law is very strict and nobody has the right to violate the patient's confidentiality and have access to the medical information without been authorized by the patient. For this action Kevin will need written authorization in order to have access to the records. According to the Code of Ethics for Nurses is the nurse who is charged with helping to preserve the patient’s privacy by only asking the questions that are clinically relevant. “Confidentiality is

Moodey is not to discuss the patients lab results at all with anyone other than the patient because assistant are there to greet and make patient trust them to better help them with their needs. John should have been told that they contact him on his cell phone when the results are in but he needs to give personal information to see them on line. When the results come in Sally does not have to contact the patient because it is the patient job to make a appointment to rebook.

Jay Katz argues that informed consent entrenches and has become an essentiality, particularly during the time that medical practice were less than experimental. Furthermore, he argues that the courts made vehement pleas for more patient self-determination and concurrently weakening the pleas by giving physicians significant freedom to practice according to their own inclinations. Thus, the consequence of this and shared decision-making are identical and the existing law and the conventional medical practices fail to satisfy the concept of informed consent. The tradition of silence in

In the medical field or any other professions, privacy is paramount. One of the most important things is confidentiality. In this case, patients should be able to trust that they treating physicians will not disclose their personal information to other parties without their consent. The question then becomes: Under what circumstances is it alright for physicians to disclose private medical information to third party without informed consent? Did Dr. Shapiro have the right to disclose Mr. Lovington’s private medical information to his wife Anna, who is also his patient?

The individual right (medical ethics) would be to protect the confidentiality of the patient. This would ensure trust between the patient and the physician. If the patient test positive, the patient has to trust their privacy will

During this session, issues relating to disclosure of HIV test result and ancillary finding of genetic testing, as well as the case about release of test result to a patient against his family’s wishes, were discussed. Walking through the series of questions that we could ask ourselves to determine if withholding of information is appropriate was very helpful. It was agreed that checking all the boxes does not mean that withholding information is justified; rather, it is a way to build a stronger argument for the case.

This Agreement is made and entered by and between Catalyst Healthcare Marketing, a Texas corporation (“Company”) and ____________________ (“Client”).

Regence Blue Shield of Washington is a subsidiary of Cambia Health Solutions (formerly the Regence Group) a nonprofit health insurance company founded in 1917. Regence Blue Shield is one of the largest health insurance carriers in the Washington state. Regence offers Employer, Individual and Managed Medicare coverage. In the 2014 Regence Year in Review, they insure over 1 million consumers, have 1,800 employees, and contract with over 34,700 providers in 748 in network facilities. In 2014 Regence Blue Shield was the number 3 Accident and Health Line of Business of the Top 40 Authorized Companies in State of Washington according to the annual report.

Our company provides services to analyze the medical billing and payments of health care providers like hospitals, labs, pharmacies to detect any frauds. All our clients are HIPAA compliant, and as mandated by HIPAA, we have signed Business Associate Agreement with all our clients. The company doesn’t process any billing, and only the billing information flows from IT systems of the health care providers.

If I was in Andrea’s position, I would not use my smart phone to video tape the seizure activity of the patient. Under no circumstances should any nurse utilize his or her smart phone for such procedure. Let me reiterate because some of the content of this post is similar to my previous discussion. In this scenario, it might appear that the nurse is insubordinate but she has that given right to advocate for her patient; this is what a prudent nurse would and should do. As for the HIPAA that was implemented in 1996, does this rule apply to Andrea? Absolutely, (Hebda & Czar, (2015, p. 235) stated that “the HIPAA Privacy Rule was crafted to protect the privacy of people who seek healthcare.” Andrea needed consent but

Nurses never know what their day is going to consist of, from the number of patients, to the amount of medication being administered. Nursing is a critical thinking career that uses rules and regulation to keep it well organized, safe, and in order. Use of technology in healthcare has taken root, and this has its benefits and disadvantages. Smartphones and other similar gadgets have become so common in the society and healthcare is not an exception. Use of these gadgets by healthcare personnel especially nurses has key legal and ethical issues that need careful evaluation. From the scenario, the use of smartphones has several implications on the performance of the nurse who is also on a night shift. The ending of the scenario entails representing the previous experience to social media and posting of photos that compromise the privacy of the patient. In this discussion, the ending of the scenario is discussed based on moral and ethical issues of the case study.

Today, technology is usually way ahead in every aspect of our world, especially with mobile devices such as tablets and smartphones. All of these devices have photography and data transmission as well as storage capabilities. These functions, on mobile devices, present legal challenges and issues especially when it comes to compliance with HIPPA. While HIPPA regulations do describe how patient health information or PHI should be handled, to date, they have not been changed to specifically account for smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Laws and policies must be implemented to protect PHI on personal mobile devices. At the state level, the policymakers that will be contacted are Richard Corcoran, House Health Committee Chairman and Aaron

I hope everyone is having a great Friday! After careful considerations and due-diligence into several different options - both cloud and in-house, I have attached a proposal for creating a 100% HIPAA environment for your dental practice. HIPAA is a tough thing to break down into simple terms and the proposal is very complex, as it combines one-time costs, yearly costs, and monthly costs. At the request of Charles, I am providing the proposal in its entirety to you in advance. I shall take a moment from here to go over a few points on the idiosyncrasies of both options and some food for thought on each.

HHS will support the privacy, security, and integrity of patient health information across all of its HIE acceleration activities: Over the past years, HIPAA has become a serious problem in the healthcare field. Although sharing of patient information through EHR is highly encouraged, it is crucial that only the people involved in the care of the patient have access to the patient’s data. Moreover, patients should give consent to the providers before sharing their medical information. Stage 1 of meaningful use encourages the protection of the patient’s electronic information. This principle is aligned wih the concept of meaningful use.

It is the doctor’s responsibility to share all information with the patient to ensure they are fully informed of the impending decision and if they don’t, I feel they are violating this oath, both to the medical field and to themselves.