Half The World Lives On 1 % Of Its Land

Critically evaluate the weaknesses/limitations/problems of the article. Is the work thorough? Fair? Clear? Convincing?

To be clear, the intent of this essay is not to argue for or against the content; instead, we are analyzing what the article does in terms of the following:

Choose four important words used in the article, and indicate whether each word is neutral or emotionally charged. (Respond in point form.)

In conclusion, the author opposes every idea mentioned in the article. This proves that his negative attitude could affect the way the reader views his points. White’s explanation of the pros and cons contradict his opinions shown in the article. In regard to the author presenting this article with facts, he failed to support them with any credibility. Thus, his assumptions are weak which make his claim unreliable.

This critique will outline the following, but not limited to: a brief summary of the article itself, a detailed review and assessment of the writing, and a choosing of agreement or disagreement.

Write a response paragraph to this article. The purpose of this part of the assignment is to demonstrate that you have understood the article and thought critically about it. This is where you include your own opinions and respond to what the author wrote. This requires critical thinking and sophisticated English In this section, you can do the following things:

The article was well written and organized thought. However it did had a bit of deficiencies. Although the usage of personal experience and opinions are existing but she also used a lot of rhetorical strategies. This overreliance made the argument and the tone sound little bit emotional. The introduction of

1. Read the attached article (after question 16) and write a short summary and reaction to it.

7. What is your personal stake in this issue? How do your past experiences with this topic (or previous knowledge about it) inform your perspective? What is your response to assertions that the writer makes? Do you agree and/or disagree with the writer? Why?

Southeast Asia for example was only identified because it was “a suitable geographical platform for military strategists.” There are not many characteristics that are unique to that part of the world. Considering the agricultural patterns for example, they are the same patterns found in southern China and central Madagascar to name a few. There is no concrete way to define landmasses based on environmental criteria since there are many different, unrelated areas with the same environmental conditions. Southwest Asia and North Africa is another example of this.

Asia accounts for 59.78% of the total world population. In fact, China and India alone constitute about 37% of the world population. The total number of Asian countries is 48, including three of the most powerful forces in the global market, China, India, and Indonesia. Those three countries make up more than 40 percent of the earth’s inhabitants (Moran, Harris, & Moran, 2011, p. 323).

Objectively (without any opinions), summarize the article in your own words, including all of the most important ideas from beginning, middle, to end.

Even though the authors have valid points and cite credible sources, their argument fails to be effective in several ways. For one,

The chart/ graph that I found the most surprising was the first one which was a map. The first map shows a circle on the map encompassing the countries, China, India. Indonesia, Bangladesh, Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Burma, Thailand, South Korea, Nepal, Malaysia, North Korea, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Cambodia Laos, Mongolia, and Bhutan. According to the data alongside the map, it explains that the circle encompassing the countries presents the location of where over 50% of the world’s population occupation. That means that there are an abundance of people living in Asia. I already knew that Asia had a mass of people living there, but I was exceedingly surprised on the number/ percentage of people there were living in what seems like such a

Making a check with Oxford Dictionary; Southeast Asia is defined as the part of south-eastern Asia that includes the countries of Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Burma (Myanmar), the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. A “region” refers to an area, especially part of a country or the world having definable characteristics but not always fixed boundaries, and an “identity” refers to a close similarity or affinity (Oxford University Press n.d.). Now, if we relook at the definition of each word in the sentence, “SEA is a region without an identity,” you do see a certain paradox. The phrase “SEA is a region”