Hamlet Character Analysis

Questions regarding life, death, and the reasoning behind all of our existences are questions philosophers continuously ask themselves, and unfortunately, philosophies have yet to sufficiently answer them. Over many centuries, an abundance of philosophers dedicated their lives in search of answers to these questions. Throughout Shakespeare's classic tragedy Hamlet, the protagonist explores these existential questions, seeking clarity and justice as he attempts to cope with his father's death. In the end, Hamlet proves to be an exceedingly existential character by showing concerns with reason, action, and death.

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is an enduring revenge tragedy which reflects the philosophical values and concepts of the Renaissance era. The humanistic and existentialistic natures of man, as well as the process of scepticism have a significant impact on the ways one reacts to external factors. Shakespeare explores how one reacts to their context, encapsulating these philosophies throughout the play.

In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince Hamlet serves as one of the most multi-faceted characters in the entire play with critics often deeming his personality “paradoxical”. Ultimately, Hamlet provides the audience with the epitomy of internal contrast and instability by rapidly transitioning through periods of caution and rash action, introversion and extroversion and calculation and spontaneity.

The final way that Laertes acts as a foil to Hamlet occurs once again when Claudius and Laertes are discussing Laertes’ actions to achieve his vengeance. Claudius gives Laertes advice saying, “That we would do/ we should do when we would; for this ‘would’/ changes” (4.7.134-136). Claudius is warning Laertes that if he waits long enough, he will probably end up not doing anything at all and will not achieve his goal of vengeance. This quote spoken by Claudius is quite similar to when King Hamlet’s ghost meets with Hamlet earlier in the play to warn him about how he was killed by Claudius and that he must get revenge. King Hamlet’s ghost also warns Hamlet saying, “Taint not thy mind” (1.5.92), telling him to not over think his plan because otherwise he will not pursue his vengeance. After Claudius warns Laertes to not get side tracked, the audience is reminded of King Hamlet’s ghost telling Hamlet to not over think because then their plans will not be pursued. This scene acts as a foil towards Hamlet because soon after the conversation, Laertes does pursue his plan of seeking vengeance, whereas Hamlet has been working on his plan the whole play, and has still not started to execute it.

“To be, or not to be, that is the question,” (3.1.64). This famous line in William Shakespeare's Hamlet perfectly encapsulates Hamlet’s internal struggle throughout the play. Hamlet tells the story of the young prince of Denmark and his desire for revenge on the uncle, Claudius, who murdered his father. As is the case in many works of literature, Hamlet changes greatly throughout the play. However, because of his attempts to act insane, it can be difficult to precisely map the changes in Hamlet’s character. By carefully investigating his seven soliloquies, where he is alone and has no need to “put on an antic disposition,” one can understand and interpret how Hamlet’s character develops throughout the play.

Hamlet proves himself a temperamental, twisted character in William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet. The Prince of Denmark conveys his facetious demeanor with his behavior and sharp tongue, especially in scenes with Ophelia and Gertrude. Although Hamlet’s situation is difficult and easily sympathized by viewers, his aggression should ultimately be focused on his murderous uncle.

In the conclusion of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the audience gains an understanding of the importance of Justice to each character. In the final act both Hamlet and Laertes seek to find justice for the wrongs committed against them and their families. This leaves both men trying to identify how to right these misdeeds

Hamlet, the protagonist, uses many forms of deception in order to create a distraction. When Hamlet vows to his late father that he will get revenge, “And thy commandment all alone shall live/ within the book and volume of my brain” (Shakespeare 1.5.102-103), he begins to plot against Claudius. Hamlet,

Many view Hamlet, the main character, in Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet as a hero. He portrays characteristics that prove to the reader that he does possess heroic qualities. Although, it is a struggle for him throughout the play, but as he goes through life and learns new ways of coping things, he develops new characteristics that he didn’t have in the beginning. Hamlet learns to overcome his anxiety, depression, and anger. In the end, he learns how to be calm and collected. The way Hamlet learns how to handle internal conflicts throughout the play, shows the readers a realistic view of the difficult encounters one may have when learning to cope with different

Will Hamlet accept the new changes in his life? What is he capable of to be happy? After his father’s death, Hamlet will have to face the new changes in his hometown, Denmark. Shakespeare develops Hamlet’s character in relation to other characters in these soliloquies.

In the tragedy play Hamlet written by Shakespeare, Hamlet’s character and emotions changed various times. In Act 1 Hamlet was portrayed as weak and in a deep grief about his father’s death. In lines 78-86 as a response to his mother unsympathetic comment, Hamlets states, “Seems madam? Nay it is. I know not ‘seems.’ Tis not alone my inky cloak, good-mother, Nor customary suits of solemn black, Nor windy suspiration of forced breath, No, nor the fruitful river in the eye, Nor the dejected haviour of the visage, Together with all the forms, moods, shows of grief  That can denote me truly. These indeed ‘seem’, For they are actions that a man might play; But I have that within which passeth slowly-these but the trappings and the suits of woe.” In these lines, Hamlet explains that his visible signs of grief are nothing compared to how he feels inside. Hamlet not only offers the first illustration of the anguish and emotions of his character, but encompasses much of the universal experience of grieving. He doesn’t show it externally, but he was struggling with painful emotions internally. Act 2 Hamlet was seen as a very vengeful person due to the fact that his uncle murder his father just to be king. In line 611-616 Hamlet states,” Why, what an ass am I! This is most brave, That I, the son of a dear father murdered, Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell,

INTRODUCTION Hamlet play is one of the most honored best known, most analyzed work by great English writer William Shakespeare, which has been studied by many scholars. Hamlet is a play rich in incident and possesses a complex plot, with not only subsidiary action, but also a play with in a play. There is a great deal of suspense and a fair amount of sensational matter. There are elements like supernatural visitation, incestuous marriage, and feigned madness.

In William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet, the combination of characters’ weaknesses and circumstances lead to their downfall. Weaknesses will always exist in characters, although they go unnoticed and do not have any true impact until they are highlighted by unfortunate circumstances. These emphasized weaknesses ultimately lead to the characters’ downfall. Claudius’ ambition, Ophelia’s obedience and Hamlet’s tendency to overthink all lead to their downfalls in the play.

In Hamlet: Prince of Denmark, Shakespeare uses the tragic hero to contribute to the tragic vision of the work, through the suffering brought upon other characters from Hamlet such as, Ophelia, Laertes, and Gertrude. The story takes place in Elsinore, Denmark. In the late middle ages around and in the royal palace.

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, regarded as one his most famous plays, is based on the story of the Hamlet, the “Dark” Prince of Denmark. The protagonist, being Hamlet, is an extremely complex man with such a multi-dimensional personality that to this day, critics struggle to understand him. Each reader is left to decide his/her own interpretation of him — whether he is evil and insane, if he’s a tragic hero, or if he is a victim of circumstances beyond his control. A man of radical contradictions, Hamlet’s character remains one of the most ambiguous in American literature.