Cinematic Interpretations of Hamlet: Ghosts of the Original? William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, a tenet of English literature, has been interpreted in many different ways since its inception over 500 years ago. Shakespeare's complex subject matter transcends culture and class, lending itself to nuanced personalization. In both theatre and cinema, each director extracts from the text in a unique way, thereby bending Shakespeare to almost fit their agenda and message. These artists are largely successful at their craft as they are sourcing from Shakespeare, one of the most of intriguing authors in history. What makes his works so diverse and adaptable is his almost Talmudic writing style, nearly begging its reader for deeper analysis.
Shakespeare manipulates the text to purposely leave an aura of ambiguity. He uses this process as a hook to capture the reader's interests. Shakespeare wants the audience to be engaged and emotionally invested in his works. The physical manifestation of the play Hamlet, is conducive for intonation and humor. Sarcasm comes alive on stage whilst it may be flat or even overlooked in the text. Film uses its' medium's unique opportunity to employ special techniques and narratives to create a heightened atmosphere. Film can generate sophisticated feelings in the audience by eliciting suspense via musical score or shadows. It can also elicit empathy for Hamlet that would not be present otherwise. Viewers then draw on these sensations and internalize their own opinions.
Different cinematic techniques can influence the perceptions which an
…show more content…
This vivid illustration of Hamlet creates empathy throughout the play as he tries to take revenge. When the ghost appears, he is often seated with a somber, yet serious expression on his face. This is contrary to Shakespeare’s version where there is the imagery of pride, honor and war whenever the ghost
To play one of Shakespeare’s most complex roles successfully on stage or on screen has been the aspiration of many actors. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet has been the focus on various accounts throughout the 20th Century, each actor attempting to bring something unique and unmarked to the focal character. Franco Zeffirelli and Kenneth Branagh, both film directors, introduce varying levels of success on the screen through downright differences in ways of translation and original ideas. Zeffirelli’s much shorter interpretation of the film is able to convey the importance of Hamlet as a masterwork by using modern approaches to film but still capturing the traditional work behind Shakespeare’s well-known play.
William Shakespeare's Hamlet is a drama which has been renound for its content and depiction of characters. Over the years, it has gone through many variations of interpretations and criticisms. One such criticism is the nature of the ghost who takes the form of Hamlet's dead father. At first glance, it may be sufficient to accept the ghost as the spirit of Hamlet's dead father who returns to the land of the living in order to have his son avenge his murder. However, looking deeper into the text, several unignorable signs become visible which lead us to see that the ghost is actually the devil in disguise. Kenneth Brannagh's 1997 production of Hamlet brilliantly portrays these signs of evil and
The play “Hamlet, Prince of Denmark”, by William Shakespeare being of such a complicated variety of themes, contains many different story lines as well as being very extensive in nature makes it quite a challenge to be produced and acted. On paper, the reader can translate things, as they like. Since Shakespeare is not around to tell us the meaning of every theme or the truth about every nook and cranny about his works. It is up to the reader to decide what the importance of everything is. Thus when a producer decides to create a film based on “Hamlet” it is most certain that his creation will vary from any others. Each will create their own version of the story, stressing some
William Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Franco Zeffireli’s film version of the story are different in many ways, but the basic characters and basic plot remain the same. Franco Zeffirelli’s screenplay is an edited, re-vamped version of the original tragedy in which lines are cut and scenes are modified. Additionally, Zeffirelli modifies Shakespeare’s ghost scenes and uses narrative and film techniques to both create an overall suspenseful atmosphere and generate empathetic feelings towards Hamlet. The various changes made by Zeffirelli are interesting, and attempting to analyze the decisions made by the film director allowed for not only a deeper understanding of the film, but of the story Hamlet in general.
In discussions pertaining to the nature of Hamlet’s ghost, there is much debate. On the one hand, authors such as W.W. Greg believe that Hamlet’s ghost was merely a hallucination, but on the other hand, Maurice Egan believes that Hamlet’s ghost was a real character who truly existed. Egan also contends that the ghost is sent from purgatory, however, authors such as Roy Battenhouse believe that the ghost is pagan and came from hell. Others such as Robert West maintain that the ghost is neither from heaven or hell, but was written to be purposefully confusing so that any audience member could think of the ghost in many different ways. I personally believe that the ghost was a real character who came from hell and appeared before Hamlet in
The Ghost of the previous Danish king in Hamlet is a potent element that causes Prince Hamlet variety of reactions toward the world around him and the unexpected killer, King Claudius. Besides, the ghost is the tool of knowledge that lights Hamlet's heart with the love of insisting on searching the credibility of the crime. The Ghost of Hamlet's father commanded his son to do the act of revenge from his uncle the King of Denmark the killer of his father and the husband of his mother. Hamlet has been affected by the Ghost's command and his situation has been shifted from the psychological disorder situation before discovering the truth of the crime to accept the reality of the world around him, and from the hesitation and fear situation to
Hamlet is a character with emotions that are so complex and intriguing that we, as readers or viewers, are drawn into this story until Hamlet's situations, actions, and feelings become things we can understand, and relate to, as if his emotions were as human as our own. This genuineness Hamlet holds creates for this play an audience who
Creating a tragedy that captures audiences even against the force of time is a forte of William Shakespeare's and his famous tale Hamlet is no exception. Shakespeare’s play is famous because it is obscure enough that many different interpretations and theories are able to arise as time passes by. Two film adaptations of the famous tragedy Hamlet, directed by Kenneth Branagh and Gregory Doran respectively, take this timeless story and weave it in two different creative lenses and perspectives. Though each adaptation is its own movie in itself, being derived from the same source has audiences parallel and contrast themes and tones from the two variants. Much discussion has been brought forward about the relationship between Hamlet and his mother
Shakespeare’s texts have been re-visited, re-interpreted and re-invented to suit the context and preferences of an evolving audience, and it through this constant recreation it is evident that Hamlet “does not define or exhaust its possibilities”. Through the creation of a character who emulates a variety of different themes, such as revenge, realisation of reality and the questioning of humanity, we can see the different possibilities within Hamlet as an “admirable text” with enduring human value. Furthermore, the emotional journey of Hamlet
In the staging of a Shakespearean work, directors and actors face the challenge of presenting a work with centuries of history. Alongside this challenge, however, comes the opportunity to reimagine a work with which many audiences are familiar, and in doing so breathe new life into characters who exist primarily in the two-dimensional space of the page. In seeing UA Theater and Dance’s production of Hamlet, differences between the written and spoken word alter the experience of the play dramatically. Specifically, Ian Andersen’s interpretation of Hamlet lends his character instances of levity that contrast with the darker themes of the tragedy, and the omittance of Fortinbras refocuses Hamlet to center solely on the action in Denmark. These
The Ghost is approached as an important figure in Hamlet, he plays the role of Hamlet’s father. The ghost presence is a key factor in the play. As we can see that many factors and scenes are caused by him physically being there and psychologically getting into hamlets head––“The ghost in Hamlet is essential to the plot of the play and to an understanding of both the problem, hamlet, and his character” (Joseph 493). We can see the appearance of the ghost in several scenes in Act one.
Although some may think the ghost of the late King Hamlet in William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet is a demon, but the truth is that Hamlet’s father didn 't reveal himself to anyone besides Hamlet because he knew his son would avenge his death allowing him to receive divine in Heaven.
The Ghost of the previous Danish king in Hamlet is a potent element that causes Prince Hamlet variety of reactions toward the world around him and to the unexpected killer, King Claudius. Besides, the Ghost is the tool of knowledge that lights Hamlet's heart with the love of insisting on searching the credibility of the crime. The Ghost of Hamlet's father played a crucial role in the play especially on Hamlet by telling him the truth of his death and commanding him to revenge from the killer. The role of the Ghost and his command in Hamlet caused Hamlet hesitation and skepticism about Ghost's credibility. It drives Hamlet to choose between the consequences of life or
“To be or not to be?” That is the question that has passed over the lips of countless actors playing Hamlet in the last four centuries on stage and screen. As an English poet, playwright and actor born in the 16th centuries, William Shakespeare must be the undeniable greatest writer of his time. Even though centuries passed, people never forgot his unique language and those vivid characters he created. But as more advanced technique and new knowledge access our daily life and studies nowadays, some might think the remain place for Shakespeare that has been kept for hundreds of years seems to be unnecessary. However, the modern recomposed works of Shakespeare has proved that his place in the modern society can still sustain steady for a long period of time.
In this play, the image of death is introduced from the very beginning, in Act I, once the Ghost of the old king Hamlet appears. In the plot, once the ghost is introduced, its role is to inform Hamlet about a secret murder. As Hamlet did not witness the murder, there was no need to feign madness. Shakespeare’s use of images related to both ghosts and madness intensify the central motif of