preview

Hamlet, Sin Or Justified?

Decent Essays

Revenge in Hamlet, Sin or Justified? What is Revenge? Is it right? Is it worth sinning? Is revenge the right thing to do? There are too many questions to be asked when planning revenge or thinking about revenge and those were the exact questions that were asked in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet that took place in the 1600s. According to Merriam Webster, Revenge is the act of inflicting hurt on someone for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands, and in Hamlet’s case, revenge was mandatory because of a promise he made to his murdered father’s ghost. Even though Hamlet was honoring his father and doing what the ghost of his father told him to do, revenge, in a biblical sense, would have been a sin. However, seeking revenge out of family code of honor gave Hamlet moral justification in breaking the tradition of the Elizabethan Orthodoxy. Thinking about justification and morality in the 21st century is different than back in the 1600s, during the time of this play. The revenge started when Hamlet was talking to the ghost of his father, when the ghost told him that King Claudius was the one that killed him. It started by the ghost telling Hamlet “So art thou to revenge when though shalt hear” (I.V.1726) which meant that the ghost was expecting hamlet to be ready for revenge after hearing him, The Ghost also told Hamlet that “Now, Hamlet, hear.’Tis given out that, sleeping in my orchard, a serpent stung me. So the whole ear of Denmark Is by a forgèd process of my death rankly

Get Access