Hamlet's Tragic Flaw is Death and Tragedy Essay

William Shakespeare was a writer known for his comedies and tragedies. Throughout many of his tragedies his character suffer from hamartia, which is the fatal flaw associated with the downfall of a tragic hero. Three major characters of Shakespeare's that demonstrate this characteristic are Hamlet, King Lear and Macbeth. In many ways these characters all have many similarities, but one above the rest had a harder fall. Hamlet faced many obstacles in his life at a younger age than most. Dealing with real world issues including death and family troubles without overanalyzing, and his lack of life experience lead to his tragic downfall. Hamlet is the character whose flaw was most fatal compared to Lear and Macbeth.

Thesis: Hamlet is a play of a man who is incapable of action. Hamlet’s Tragic Flaw is his inability to act. By examining his incapability to commit suicide, his inability to come to terms with killing his mother, putting on a play to delay killing Claudius and the inabilities to kill Claudius while he is praying, we see that hamlet chooses not to take action.

In William Shakespeare's play of Hamlet the main character Prince Hamlet of Denmark, recently lost his father. In the play many of Hamlets behaviors are due the fact that he has been talking to his father's ghost who only he can see, this ghost is the reason hamlet starts seeking revenge for his father whom was murdered. The idea of revenge sparks Hamlet's plan to use acting as a mad man to cover up hi s plan to kill king Cladius, this acting along with his lack of empathy and clouded judgment from his father's recent passing leads to multiple murders committed by hamlet. Hamlet would not have made a good king based on his lack of rational thinking and drive for revenge, uncontrolled madness and responsibility for multiple murders.

Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, is a classic tragedy in which personal weakness plays a large role in the fate of a central character. Hamlet’s personal weakness plays a predominant role in his eventual ending in Hamlet, however other factors also play a minor role in the outcome of the character. For Hamlet, his hamartia (fatal flaw) is his procrastination in carrying out the task that the ghost set him. However, it is apparent that although Hamlet’s personal weakness plays a large part in his eventual fate, other factors beyond Hamlet play a role in his fate. In contrast, Claudius’ personal weaknesses are fully responsible for his fate in Hamlet. Claudius’ desire for power is the weakness that eventually leads to his downfall, and

There are many topics to describe how Hamlet’s tragic flaw leads him and others to an tragic end. An example of how Hamlet’s tragic flaw leads other to an tragic end is the tragic resolution often leads to death.The story tells that some people meet doom with courage and dignity. Tragic heroes have outside forces contribute to their downfall which leads him and others to a tragic end.

Hamlets only real noticeable fatal flaw, was his inability to make decision, he broods over the consequences of his actions for to long and never acted (Durst). Hamlet hadn’t even considered that Claudius had kill his father, until a strange visit from his fathers ghost. He was still uncertain about it so he had to investigate it, and then Claudius eventually caught on to his plan and started scheming his own. Hamlet also had emotional feelings for Ophelia, but as Shakespeare had implied Hamlet had ‘tumbled’ and had no intention of wedding her (Durst). Hamlet did eventually get bac at Claudius but it did get his mother, Ophelia, and himself killed in the process.

Hamlet is a very strong boy, his father was murdered, by his uncle (Claudius) that soon became his uncle-daddy. Claudius married hamlets mother to be in the king’s spot. When king hamlets ghost came and told hamlet that Claudius killed him, he wanted hamlet to revenge on Claudius and hamlet knew that’s what he must do. Hamlets tragic flaw was definitely his sparing of Claudius, he had so many chances to kill him but he hesitated so much.

After discovering the truth behind his father’s death, that “the serpent that did sting [my] father’s life now wears his crown”, Hamlet began what would soon be the extravagant plot of his revenge against King Claudius (Act 1 Scene V). Although Hamlet had several instances where he could have avenged his father, his habit of overanalyzing every situation caused him to

William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” is a classic revenge tale. “Hamlet” is well known for the famous soliloquy “To be, or not to be” which I find best to describe Hamlet’s character. Hamlet was given the task to avenge his father’s death. As the story progress Hamlet begins to question his worthiness, questioning his very existence. Hamlet’s emotions influence his every action throughout the story. Hamlet is not the typical hero that readers label; he has many imperfections and displays his own manner of heroism. I will talk about Hamlet’s flaws and his sanity in this essay, and with them opinions of others as well as my own. I will also include my thoughts about the central theme and symbols in the story.

Conversely, at the turning point in the play, Hamlet's characteristics presents a dynamic change. He has an epiphany that completely contradicts his tragic flaw. The idea of “spur[ing his] dull revenge” in Act 4, Scene 4, Line 35 Hamlet motivates himself to get the job done and stop at nothing: "My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!" (4.4, 65) he believes that if Fortinbras could march thousands of men to their death over a small benefit, then he should not have any excuses to delay the revenge. However, this plan of action came too late in the play. The tragic flaw had already set up the fate for Hamlet and the Throne of Denmark.

Though he possesses a noble stature, he is not infallible. His tragic flaw is his obsessive thought processes. As with the classic story of a tragic hero, Hamlet does not survive long enough to see the true ramifications of his actions due to his tragic flaw of identifying too intensely with the power of language and words. Though this is an admirable quality to have – this intense attention to the power of wordplay and communication through words – he becomes the victim of his thought patterns and begins to live in self-created illusions of the mind, as he says in his early monologed: “It is not, nor it cannot come to good. / But break my heart, for I must hold my tongue!” (1.2. 362-63). Due to his overthinking and obsession with words, he is trapped by inaction and indecision. His inability to take action or make a decision in his desire to avenge his father is eventually what leads to his demise, as it is foreshadowed when he states, “Their virtues else- be they as pure as grace, / As infinite as man may undergo- / Shall in the general censure take corruption / From that particular fault. The dram of e'il / Doth all the noble substance often doubt to his own scandal” (1.4.661-65). It is his deep internal dialogue and his obsession with understanding every aspect of the nature of things that eventually brings him to his tragic

Hamlet, is flawed because he is unable to take action. For example; when Hamlet was feeling like death would be the answer to all of the world’s pain and heartache that it is “heir to”, he couldn’t

The play "Hamlet" is a tragedy, when looking at tragedies we know that there is a key figure that is a great person, but they always have predominant fault, also known as the tragic flaw. In Hamlet we watch his indecision ultimately cause his destruction. He procrastinates killing his uncle up until the end of the play, which in the end destroys him. At the end of this play Hamlet finds out that Claudius didn't only murder his father, but his mother as well (indirectly). Even though Hamlet overcomes his procrastination, it is too late he was already slashed with the poison foil. His flaw ultimately caused his death,

After research I found that many people over the internet agrees to this prompt. Site after site, authors that has examined this book has said that his tragic flaw is his unability to decide what to do. I do agree that this is his flaw. This is because there were times in the play that Hamlet has had the chance to kill Claudius. In Act 3, Hamlet directs a play. When the king in his play dies, Claudius panics. He runs out and tells Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that Hamlet is a threat to himself and Denmark. So, because of his fear that his death was near, Claudiaus began to pray. Hamlet was going to kill him right then and there. But Hamlet was scared that he would send Claudius straight to heaven. So, he decided not to. There was another

Another dishonourable family relationship in Hamlet is that between Ophelia and her father Polonius. Polonius manipulates Ophelia for his own benefit, treating her like a tool rather than a person. Their relationships becomes pitiful when she receives orders from her father and responds with “I shall obey, my lord”, implying that she is at the service of her father. Through the analysis of act 4 scene 5 a deeper understanding can be reached about Ophelia’s relationship with her late father. Following the death of Polonius, Ophelia’s mind becomes unhinged as she drifts into insanity, speaking in songs and rhymes. Considering this scene from a feminists perspective it can be thought that Ophelia went mad with guilt having her desire for Hamlet to kill her father so that they can be together fulfilled. This theory strongly supports the idea that the relationship between Ophelia and Polonius