Hammurabi Dbq

Hammurabi’s code could have been just in many different ways depending on the situation, but Hammurabi’s code also killed many innocent people! When Hammurabi made the laws, they were placed in the middle of the town, so the people knew about the laws and the consequences if they broke the laws. In Hammurabi’s words, he said: “ Hammurabi, the protecting king am I. … That the strong might not injure the weak, in order to protect the widows and orphans.” (Doc. B). He promised to protect the weak and Hammurabi did not keep his promise. Although he meant well, Some of the laws were unjust and unnecessary. Here is why Hammurabi’s code is unjust to the property laws and the personal injury law.

Hammurabi’s code included some gruesome punishments, some that might be believed as unruly, but is still just. Hammurabi’s code was just in many ways pertaining to their time. These laws are not the oldest set, but they were possibly the most strict from the ancient world. The punishments for breaking some laws are different for the multiple classes on the social structure and genders. Also, during his time, Hammurabi was known more as a builder and conqueror than a law-giver. All in all, the laws abiding in Hammurabi’s code are just because of its personal injury and family laws.

Throughout time many civilizations and societies have come and gone. Every one of them was unique in their own way and had a different way of governing themselves. In this paper, I will be focusing on Hammurabi’s Code. Hammurabi’s Code is a series of laws that governed the Babylonian society back, when they were created, in 1780 BCE. The code was wrote by Hammurabi himself, back when he ruled the Empire of Babylon. The text itself explains why the code was created and why Hammurabi was chosen to write the code. The code then lists, in an organized fashion, all the rules that the society is to follow and what the punishments are if the rules are broken. Every rule is very specific about what is to happen if the rule has to be enforced. Hammurabi’s Code gives us an idea of how the justice system worked in the Babylonian society, how men and women in the society were treated, and how the religion was followed.

Hammurabi was the sixth and most notable king of the first Babylonian dynasty. He greatly expanded Babylon during his time as king, uniting all of Mesopotamia. His innovative Code of Laws made him an important historical figure. Hammurabi’s law codes were important not only due to the fact that they were written Akkadian—the language of the Babylonians—but also because they were physically displayed in heavily populated areas. This allowed the public to view and understand the official laws of their land—an unprecedented development during this period. Hammurabi’s Law Code provided women with a number of rights and protections, including protection of their children as well as various marital benefits.

4,000 years ago, Hammurabi wrote 282 laws while he was ruling all of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi’s code was just in my opinion. It protected many families, personal property, and against injury. To begin, Hammurabi’s Code protected families. For example, in Document C, it states “If a lady cheated on a man, she would be tied up and thrown in the water.

Throughout history, humanity has kept itself from barbarity and lawlessness by establishing rules and laws to bring order. The most primitive set of written laws historians have been able to discover is Hammurabi’s Code, which originated in 18th century BCE. Hammurabi, the author of said Code, was a king who ruled over the larger part of Mesopotamia for forty-two years. He claims these laws were handed to him by the gods and, as stated in Document B, meant to “let righteousness go forth in the land.” However, was Hammurabi’s Code really all that fair? In some areas, such as women’s rights, and property law, I’d say the law is more that fair. Nevertheless, other areas, such as the various punishments the law offered, were quite brutal.

The Mesopotamian society existed in 3500 B.C., in what is today modern Iraq. This society created the first legal codes in human history; these codes created laws, but also were filled with inequality and social division. For example, the fine for rape in the Code of Ur-Nammu was only a mere five shekels. This small fine is insulting to women and would be unacceptable today. An example for inter-social class fairness, however is in Hammurabi’s Code. Law 200 states that if a man knocked out the tooth of another man of the same social standing, he should have his tooth knocked out as well. This legal code also had difficulties with proving crimes occurred, law number one in Hammurabi’s code is a prime example, it states that if one were to accuse a crime, had no evidence, he shall be put to death. The Mesopotamians added a lot to human history, but were discriminable against women, had an abundance of social class fairness, and had dilemmas prosecuting crimes.

After the Neolithic Revolution people had the opportunity to settle as they pleased. This allowed for the development of civilizations. These civilizations had rulers, during the 18th century BCE Hammurabi was the King of Babylon. He ruled over ancient Mesopotamia and established a set of rules for his nation. Hammurabi claimed that Shamash, the god of heaven and earth, had given him these rules and the authority to carry them out. Hammurabi’s Code included two hundred and eighty-two laws that set a structure for the city-state of Mesopotamia. Family matters, property law, and even personal matters were ruled unfairly under Hammurabi’s Code.

Laws have been around since the beginning of civilization. While today most countries are pretty ‘laxed compared to ancient Babylonian times, some countries, particularly the ones in the Middle East, still have strict laws similar to Hammurabi’s Code. In today’s society Hammurabi’s Code may be viewed as a little excessive; however, for the time they were written, i find these laws to be justifiable. Hammurabi’s Code was fair to the less fortunate. He ensures equality of people with justifiable punishments for crimes people have committed which are best highlighted through his family care, property, and personal injury laws.

Tyler DuMond 7th Hour Hammurabi’s Code Was it Just? Spare the rod spoil the kingdom. This was taken to extreme in ancient Mesopotamia. Hammurabi became king in 1792 BCE.

Hammurabi’s Code : Was It Just?I think Hammurabi's Code was Unjust because of the Family Laws.(Doc A)Below the prologue closer to the base, are 282 laws organized by theme including family life and agriculture.this is unjust because not everyone knew how to read or write so they couldn’t know these laws.(Doc B)it says the strong may not injure the weak then why when the mother or the son if he hits the man they shall be put to death or get their hands cut off and things like that.(Doc C) law 129:if a married lady is caught with another man,they shall be put to death but this is unjust because maybe the man still loves her and doesn't want another wife and who will do all the wife's duties like clean the house take care of the kids and cook the

Hammurabi's Code was it Just?I think Hammurabi's Code was unjust because of the Personal injury law.(Doc E)Law 218 says “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused his death,...his hands shall be cut off”. Even though the man died, he was put under the doctor's care, but if the injury was very serious and the doctor used the lancet, but the patient died because of the injury, why should the doctor be punished. Back then, even if the doctor did kill him he couldn't of really saved the many because they don't have the technology to help him.(Doc B) In this law it says “Hammurabi the protecting king I am…. That the strong might not injure the the weak……”. It says that he ‘shall’ not allow

Hammurabi, the ruler of Mesopotamia, invented 282 laws approximately 4,000 years ago to obtain peace. In my opinion, Hammurabi’s Code was not just; it affected many families in a negative way, there were many other ways to resolve the problems presented, and most of the victims were treated unfairly. Foremost, Hammurabi’s Code separated families. For example, in Document C Law 129 when the son strikes his father there are more other responsible ways to punish the son other than cutting off his hands.

Hammurabi’s Code Hammurabi’s Code was created by Hammurabi. I think that Hammurabi’s Code was too brutal and unfair because in almost every rule there is death, unfair laws and much more horrifying deaths, and laws. Some of these documents and laws are truly unfair, and some don’t make any sense. In my opinion, these laws are very terrifying as we talk about these laws. Hammurabi’s Code pococurante about women.

Hammurabi’s code was just to both the accused and the victim, and it was designed to keep the society at the time safe and secure. He was ruling with the kingdom's best interests in mind. His intentions were good, and he was very thorough when creating laws. The gods commanded Hammurabi to base his rulings on these laws, and he was merely following their instructions.