Happiness : The Goal Of Life

Dalai Lama explain the only way we could pursuit happiness is religion because there are millions different religion to find the right one for each person to help them find what happiness is. John Ciardi's last paragraph tells how happiness is never more than partial and no pure states of mankind. Aristotle tells how to get happiness is through physically and mentally The last person is from a the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day-Saint name Jack H. Goaslind explain what is happiness and how we the people get that feeling.

In the words of Mahatma Gandhi, “Happiness is when you want to think what you think what you say, and what you do are in harmony.” Describing happiness can seem as ambiguous as accomplishing and achieving it. Without help, we as different individuals all have the same want---- happiness. However, the satisfaction in life can not be defined through just one definition or study. The concept of happiness and it’s sources have been defined through religious, psychological and abstract ground. People in general are happier when they are around a set of people that uplifts them, because psychologically their happiness is affected by their environment.

Based on Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi “Happiness Revisited” People have many different points of view about how to achieve happiness, it can be based on the type of life one is having, an experience, a way of living, culture, and religion. Happiness can be defined in many ways but happiness is not something we find or get just by magic. In “Happiness Revisited” by Csikszentmihalyi, the author emphasizes that “It is by being fully involved with every detail of our lives, whether good or bad, that we find happiness, not by trying to look for it directly.” And just as he stays that happiness is when someone is involved in everything that happens in live either good or bad, one example that I think Csikszentmihalyi will describe as an optimal experience

What is happiness? People have agonized over this question for centuries. Let me start this essay by answering a somewhat easier question: what isn’t happiness? Happiness is NOT feeling good all the time. Happiness is a combination of human emotions and states of mind. Exploring this state of being has consumed the philosophical minds of the ages and will continue to do so for ages to come.

In his book “Happier”, Tal Ben-Shahar talks about what happiness is, and the significant components of a happy life form chapter one to chapter five. Firstly, he uses the championship event to explain that happiness is not just a simple thing. He won the contest, but the happiness did not last, and disappeared quickly. Therefore, he began to research to figure out what happiness is. Moreover, he discusses people’s usual models for happiness. He also demonstrates the importance of pleasure and essential of meaning about happiness as well as other factors such as quantity and quality. Furthermore, he claims that happiness is the ultimate currency for people by discussing the relationship between wealth and happiness. Lastly, he advises people what attitude they should have, and how they should set their goals in order to pursue happiness. In the first part of Ben-Shahar’s book “Happier”, there are three important

“Happiness is often defined as the goal of human actions reached through ethical behavior”. Happiness is usually referred to a feeling. However, the term can describe a range of positivity and state of being. Happiness is not feeling good all the time, not being rich and not a final destination. I will discuss the vision of happiness in Matthew Chapter five through seven King James Version and The Sermon At Benares.

Throughout history humankind has been trying to define happiness. What is it exactly and how do we obtain it? We always think that happiness is a place to be or a destination and technically, that is the main premise or goal of our lives; to obtain happiness. So our whole lives go by from the minute were born to the last breath we take in a quest to work hard in order to reach that destination. Naturally, many philosophical writers have jumped on the bandwagon and put in their two cents of their views on the matter of happiness. Alexander Pope talks about the relationship and purpose man has to the universe in An Essay on Man, Voltaire wrote about living in blind optimism with a false notion of happiness in Candide, and Samuel

In his book “Happier”, Tal Ben-Shahar talks about what is happiness, and the significant components of a happy life form chapter one to chapter five. Firstly, He uses the championship event to explain that happiness is not just a simply thing. He won the contest, but the happiness did not last, and disappeared quickly. Therefore, he began to research, and to figure out what is happiness. Moreover, he discusses the people’s usual model for happiness. He also demonstrates the importance of pleasure and meaning for happiness as well as other factors such as quantity and quality. Furthermore, he calms that happiness is the ultimate currency for human by discussing the relationship between wealth and happiness. Lastly, he advises

In search of happiness for millennia, humanity has sought refuge in superficial objects, money, relationships, and nature. However, no one has much been able to define how to truly achieve happiness. It has been defined as achievable by being at peace with your inner self, or just being without worry for the rest of your days. Many Greek philosophers have added to the discussion as well as many Eastern based religions, as well as modern literaries, all claiming to know how to reach happiness.

The definition of happiness varies from individual to individual. Some argue that happiness is an emotion, others argue that it is a state of being. The various perceptions that people hold of happiness illuminates its abstract and ambiguous nature. This variability, in regards to happiness, is displayed throughout history from the Hellenistic schools of philosophy and the Ancient philosophers to more modern day theologians such as C.S Lewis and Alister McGrath. Despite the various views of happiness, there are many similarities between them. Chapter 3 of Alister McGrath’s Theology The Basics and excerpts from Plato’s The Republic both depict distinct but similar views of happiness, however the perception of happiness implied

Happiness is what all human beings/rational beings desire. It is always the end (goal) of our activities, it is an unconditional good.

The everlasting question of "What is Happiness?" has been inquired since the creation of men. Unfortunately, the only agreed answer that humanity came up with is that all the creatures seek happiness, but no one has the concrete directions for achieving it. Our libraries are overwhelmed with books about happiness, but no dictionary definition explains which path men must take to be happy. No mathematician gave us the axiom which we could use to solve the problem of living in bliss. No scientist brought up the formula of fusing certain ingredients to produce the "drink of happiness". Still almost all the people consider that their ultimate purport in

While the true form of happiness can never truly be known by people, religion claims to explain the true idea of happiness as described by a supreme being. The higher idea of happiness may only exist in heaven, because it cannot be represented in its original, exact form on earth. Because heaven is represented as the holiest, most ideal place, it is where this idea of perfect happiness exists, and it is the only place where it can exist. All happiness on earth that is experienced by humans is only a representation of this perfect happiness, and this is what people strive for.

At first glance, happiness is a state of mind that many, if not all people aspire to achieve in their lifetime. What exactly is that state of mind is up for debate among the east and the west, and varies between different cultures, traditions, and religions. In the west, happiness is mostly associated with success, wealth, fame and power. In the east, happiness can be viewed as freedom from mundane occurrences such as the occupation of western powers from within a country, the end of war, poverty and famine, and liberation of the false self. In contemporary times, and with the arrival of eastern philosophy, religions, and traditions in the west, many are turning inwards and using a tool believed to have more power than an atomic bomb, the human mind. In China, India and various other Asian countries, the mind has long been a powerful tool used to liberate one from suffering, the cyclic cycle of life, as well as a means to reach enlightenment and immortality. However, the mind is only a tool, and not the way per se.

It is common sense that all the human beings would like to live a happy life and they will spare no efforts in order to realize the purpose of really living a happy life in the end. However, different people have different definitions toward what a happy life is and they tend to have different standards as for how a life is that can be regarded as a happy life. There is no doubt that people will then try different means in order to pursue a happy life based on their definition toward what a happy life is. Therefore, the following will talk about the pursuit of a happy life from the perspectives of both Dalai Lama in The Art of Happiness and Viktor E. Frankl in Man’s Searching for Meaning, during which the experiences of some characters from the film Forrest Gump will be applied as evidence. Generally speaking, the pursuit of a happy life in the minds of Dalai Lama and Viktor E. Frankl can be achieved via experiencing sufferings and adversity. It is hoped that this analysis can help people understand what a happy is from a different point of view.