Harsher Penalties On The Crime Rate

The starting point of violence takes place in communities and at home--not at school. Youth take what they hear and see at home and in their communities to school. The environment in some communities and households are positive and the presences of protective factors outweigh the high risk factors. However, there are communities and households where there is a lack of informal social control and high risk factors exist more than protective factors--, which affect youth in a negative manner.

School violence can be prevented by parents, communities, teachers, and even classmates can help reduce violence and improve the overall school environment, Also, education and consequences must occur in the home by parents and educators to effectively help reduce school and youth violence. This strategy stands in contrast to use prevention strategies, such as metal detectors and other security measures to help determine benefits and evidence that may offer knowledge and experience in preventing school violence that can enhance approaches to end school

Some of these positive results of after-school programs include, less juvenile crimes are being committed and children are less likely to become victims of violent crimes. This means that the assumptions made that after-school programs will reduce the number of crimes children commit is true. When children have somewhere to go, they will not be out running around on the streets potentially committing crimes or being victim to crimes. Also, the amount of school vandalism has decreased, children are learning how to better deal with anger, and the are developing better social skills. When children are enrolled in after-school programs, they are not only furthering their education beyond the school hours, but they are also building more meaningful relationships with their peers by spending more time with them. They are interacting with their peers outside of the school environment which allows them to

Some people today feel that they are isolated from their own community. In Oak Park, Illinois, third through eighth graders took a survey. Roughly 42% of them said they felt excluded or embarrassed socially by their classmates. Another 32% stated that they were bullied by their piers. With all these emotions going through them at such a young and developing age, it can cause serious damage with the way the kids and young teens look at life. With them feeling removed from their school community and friend groups, they may act out in violent ways against those who have made them feel this way. For example, there have been many stories in the news regarding students who bring weapons to school with the intent of harming others. Another result

In the last few decades, there has been an increase in the number of individuals who have been incarcerated in both federal and state prisons. Indeed, research has shown that harsher sentencing policies and more punitive laws have resulted in the incarceration of more than 2.3 million people in the varied jails and prisons; thereby making the United States the leader as far as incarceration is concerned. Incarceration and sentencing systems have conventionally been aimed at having varying goals including rehabilitation, incapacitation, punishment and deterrence. Recent decades have seen the enactment of sentencing policy initiatives with the aim of enhancing the criminal justice systems deterrent effect.

Based on my interpretation of the reading, higher crime rate themselves has lowered crime rates. Base on many studies conducted and funded by the U.S. department of justice there has been a relationship between the incarceration and crime. Research has founded that reduced crime rates are associated with increase imprisonment rates. On the other hand, increase in crime rate are associated with a decrease in imprisonment rates. Based on this, I would have to say that higher incarceration rates had reduce crime rates.

Mandatory sentencing refers to those sentences which a judicial officer is required to impose no matter what the circumstances of the offence. In other words, the judicial officer has no discretion to impose a higher or lower sentence depending upon the nature of the crime. In the case of one punch laws, the mandatory sentence is a minimum so a judicial officer is able to impose a higher sentence if he or she thinks it’s appropriate. For example, a person who king hits someone will automatically get an eight-year mandatory minimum sentence. If someone else does the same thing one month later in a different place and is heard by a different judge he will get that same mandatory minimum sentence of eight years in prison and possibly longer if the judge thinks it’s suitable.

The findings of this paper have raised several issues based on the linkage between scale of incarceration and crime rates in a given jurisdiction. First, results indicate that the effectiveness of incarceration in instances of increased crime may rely on a given jurisdiction. This means that this policy of crime reduction may not be universally effective. Generally, jurisdictions whose incarceration policy implementation are at advanced stages may face lesser challenges in crime reduction that their less developed peers. This is an obvious finding because it is expected that

There have been theories made by people in government position on the crime epidemic and how to lower crime the crime rate. Many believe that the tougher the consequences, the better it would help people deter away from a life of crime. Unfortunately, this is not true for countries like the United States. We have very strict consequences for people that commit crime, yet we also have one of the

Part 1: Nature, Extent, Impact of Crime Policy on Crime & the Administration of Justice in the U.S.

Mandatory Sentencing, defined by definitions.uslegal.com, are those sentences which a judicial officer is required to impose regardless of the circumstances of the offense. This means, the judicial officer has no discretion to impose a higher or lower sentence depending upon the nature of crime. In my way of thinking, there is something wrong with the way people are being convicted, and how easily people get off compared to others - and it needs to be changed.

Lastly, a more punitive justice system would cause overcrowding within our justice system, making a more detrimental environment for the offenders to live in. The purpose of prisons should be to rehabilitate offenders and prepare them to reenter society. Rather, what prions are doing is locking inmates away in atrocious environments, making them live with less resources and less space to function. This is not a suitable environment for any human being. Cook & Roesh (2012) contend that, “double-bunking inmates increased because of overcrowding, and there are more segregation-like units which have limited offenders’ access to rehabilitation programs” (p. 220). By limiting offenders rehabilitation programs, prisons are not offering their inmates a chance at improving themselves, when the inmates are released, there is still a chance of recidivism. Furthermore, overcrowding showed signs of poor mental and physical health (Cook & Roesh, 2012, p. 220). If a more punitive justice system were to come into place, mass incarceration would develop putting prisons at a higher risk of overcrowding. Through overcrowding there are health issues pertaining to the inmates and leaves them with a higher risk of recidivism when leaving prison. The job of prisons should be to turn offenders into productive members of society, not subject them to inhumane living conditions. Although offenders are incarcerated as a punishment to their crimes, it does not show progressive results when the

A violent offence is when there is an intent of hurting a person by homicide, sexual assault, robbery, negligence and many other ways. With the “tough on crime”, policies there can be a high number of unjust sentencing, not every crime is identical, you cannot give everyone the exactly same sentencing, there are different people, location and time for each crime. The tough on crime policies should be changed; there needs to be a change of the way the legal system sentence offenders. These policies are causing higher population in prison which can cause fewer resources for all prisoners, which can be unlawful if they do not even receive basic rights of proper shelter, clothing, sanitary and even having less phone time to call back home. There

The five different school-based prevention strategies are cognitive, affective, behavioral, environmental, and therapeutic. The cognitive strategy is identified as when students increase their awareness about the danger of drug abuse and delinquency. Affective strategy is when students improve psychological assets and self imaging to give them the resources to resist antisocial behavior. Environmental is established when school management and disciplinary programs that deter crime, such as locker searches. The behavioral strategy is when we train students in technique to resist peer pressure. The final strategy is the therapeutic strategy. The therapeutic strategy is when we treat youths who have already manifested in different problems, with

School violence, in recent history, seems to have taken the United States by storm. Be it a shooting, such as the Columbine High School shooting in 1999, the inappropriate relationships between teacher and student, such as Stephanie Figueroa whom initiated one such relationship with her 11-year-old karate student, or the multiple fights we see on social media that take place in schools. With each passing week, we see a new story that falls in one of these categories. Today, we look at the types of, causes of and how to prevent violence in what should be a safe place and second home for our youth.