Have You Ever Seen A Cruelty Free Symbol In The Shape Of

A rabbit lives its life trapped in a laboratory. It doesn’t get fresh air and has different products tested on it every day. The product can make the rabbit go blind or cause its skin to burn, but there is nothing the rabbit can do about it. This is what happens to animals every day from cosmetic companies who test their products on animals. According to Cruelty Free Kitty (2017), over 30 cosmetic companies continue to use animal testing to improve their products. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2017), “the agency has consistently advised cosmetic manufactures to employ whatever testing is appropriate and effective for substantiating the safety of their products.” This means that if the company believes animal testing is the best option for their product they are allowed to do it. Testing cosmetics on animals is cruel and inhumane, and people should avoid using products that test on animals.

Animal testing is still done by cosmetic companies even though it is unethical and scientifically inaccurate. The various tests carried out on animals is not a guarantee for using cosmetics on our skin since animals react differently to certain chemicals as compared to humans. Cosmetics companies kill millions of animals every year in pursuit of profit. The animals that suffer and die in these laboratories range from rabbits to mice. According to companies that perform such tests, they are done to establish the safety of products and ingredients. However, no law requires that cosmetics products be tested on animals. The Food and Drug

95% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests. This is because of the different genes between a human and an animal. The failure of the drugs can also be caused due to the fact that out of 93 dangerous drug side effects, only 19% could have been predicated by animal tests. Another piece of evidence that has been brought to the attention of many is that the testing of animals is a waste. Only 6% of 4,300 international companies involved in drug development have registered a new drug with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since 1950. Even those drugs that are approved are not universally effective due to individual reactions, the top ten highest-grossing drugs in the U.S. only help between 1 in 4 and 1 in 25 people who take them. The last reason why animal testing should be reconsidered is common sense but overlooked. Animals are much more different from humans than imagined. Animals are incapable of being diagnosed of the same diseases that humans are. Their bodies do not allow them to have illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease, major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, HIV or schizophrenia. A simple drug like aspirin is toxic to many animals, including cats, mice and rats and would not be on our pharmacy shelves if it had been tested according to current animal testing

Animal testing has been going on for years; however, few question the ethics of testing medicines that would cure human diseases on animals. Various animals being tested in labs and cruelly force them to be a host of harmful diseases negatively affect their health. Animal testing is cruel and unusual punishment and should discontinue. Animal experimentation is a subject that many know of but don’t know much about. Although it is a big topic, people still don’t pay much attention to it because of their lack of information. Experimenting is a cruel process that causes many innocent animals to suffer. Many cases of violations towards experimenting have been found as well. Testing on animals is unnecessary when laying down the

Animals are not a reliable benchmark for testing because animals and humans have a completely different biological make up. In fact, PETA said that 72% of drugs shown to be effective in humans, have a different response in humans or are harmful to the body (Animal Testing Is Bad Science Point/Counterpoint). Disregarding the fact that some animal testing trials make it to human trials about 100,000 humans lose lives each year from taking prescriptions originally tested on animals(Animal Aid). Concluding that even if tests were to be done on animals, the drugs are not always safe, proving that animal testing can take more lives than needed and is horrifically

First, animal experimentation should not be used because nine times out of ten, it doesn’t work. For example, an article “Animal Testing Needs to Go” by Campus Times, explains that research increasingly shows that animals that were tested on do not correspond to humans. Meaning that experimental drugs tested on animals fail on human trials 9 out of 10 times.

The animal testing debate is centered on animal rights and moral status of animals. Some people believe that animals have a moral status, and it is unethical to subject them to unnecessary pain and abuse. Some people have kept animals such as dogs and cats and look upon them as part of their family. Ethicists feel that humans have no right to kill animals, subjecting them to human services or using them as means to achieve their selfish goals. I concur that animals have some moral status and rights, but people are more important than animals. It is morally right to use

Despite the fact that the scientific world continues to embrace the use of animal testing, many scientists consider this act barbaric and ruthless (Food and Drug Administration 34). They go ahead to argue that the reliability and validity of this method are significantly questionable because to use an animal to predict how a certain product will react to human beings has a lot of uncertainty. In addition to that, some drugs may work excellently in animals and terribly fail in human beings. A good example is Thalidomide in Germany in the 1970s, which had been tested on a number of animals in their thousands and was declared safe for human use and released in the market in 1950s. It was a highly rated sedative for breastfeeding and pregnant mothers because the scientists involved argued that it affects neither the mother nor the child (Hackman 123). Never the less, most children whose mothers had embraced the use of Thalidomide were born with extreme deformation across the world. Another good example on how unreliable animal experiments are is Clioquinol. This drug was declared safe in stopping or controlling diarrhea in 1970s in Japan. Ironically, this drug was a catalyst in causing diarrhea and as a result many people died in thousands and many others remained blind. In addition to the examples above, the medical journal in Britain evaluated a number of scientific reviews concerning the

Did you know that the shampoo you use was probably forced down the throat of a rabbit, cat, or maybe even a dog? Each year, millions of animals are used to test how safe and effective products, such as cosmetics, are. They are genetically modified, force-fed harmful chemicals, blinded, scalded, and maimed. How could one not object to this awful cruelty? Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, unnecessary, inaccurate, and expensive.

According to ( Animal Testing and the Law), There are legal tests that include burning, poisoning, starving, forced smoking, mutilating, blinding, electrocuting, drowning, and dissecting innocent animals without painkillers. We allow animal testing to happen all the time to animals, even baby animals! We animal test on cosmetics, medicines, foods, etc. For example, a person decides to test on an animal for a cure to a new disease, it could kill the animal or make it really sick. Testing cures in animals is cruel and inhumane. They shove medicine and other devices down an animals throat or forcefully into the animals body. We don’t recognize that animals, big or small, have feelings and a life too! Scientists who test on animals as their subjects are mean to the animals and force them to do things they don’t want to do. (Sing Animals for Testing), says that in animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use or during the experiment. Other animals are injured and will still live the remainder of their lives in

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

As we know animal testing is not illegal, innocent animals can be taken and used for research purposes (Naked). In addition, there is no legal threshold for how much pain and suffering an animal can be exposed to in an experiment (Ferdowsian). Terrified animals are having substances forced down their throats, dripped into their eyes, or smeared onto their skin and being left to suffer for days or weeks without any pain relief (Naked). Even critics have stated that animal testing is cruel (Ferdowsian). It's one thing to conduct animal testing on mice and rats, or even cats or dogs but to subject intelligent and innocent creatures like this is cruel (Panahi). Animals can't fight against this and they don’t have the choice to be taken therefore it is clearly unfair to them. Animal testing is cruel and inconsiderate to innocent animals and needs to be

Currently, there are millions of rats, cats, dogs, rabbits, and many other animals that are trapped inside cages in labs around the country. They suffer badly as their bodies ache and they are lonely and long to be free. These animals hope that one day they will be set free as they must wait in fear for the next experimentation to begin. The conditions the animals are put through are harsh and usually cause the organism to have strange behaviours such as pulling out their hair or biting at their own skin. They are so scared that every time someone walks by, they jump, scared to death that it's their turn to be tortured. Even after going through these many situations, most of these animals end up dead. Animal testing is extremely immoral and unethical as it causes the suffering of animals when in fact, the results are almost always inaccurate killing millions of animals. Most of the animals that are put in the test almost never show accurate results. As well, there are many other alternatives that can be used instead of the murder of all these living organisms that have done nothing to deserve it. These efforts are usually less expensive and don’t occur at the cost of a living organism. Therefore, due to animal rights and ethical issues, alternative methods, and the unreliability of test results in humans, animal testing must be prohibited for use in today’s research, treatments and products.

Animal testing is any scientific experiment or test, in which a live animal is forced to undergo something which will likely cause pain. Humans could choose whether or not they want to undergo painful tests, they receive benefits such as, money to compensate. However, animals have no say and end up dying. How come scientists are not placed in jail for murdering animals; however, human murderers are? Living inside a cage when you are helpless and having strangers torture you for tests is not desirable for anyone. We have come along way since 1865 in which testing on animals launched, so why are we still using unnecessary and outdated methods for approving a product. It will never be acceptable for humans to kill for our own profit. “Treat others the way you want to be treated.” Once a wise man said. Just placing the word “for science,” does not mean it truly helps with science research. Animal testing is as much unnecessary as it is immoral.

Despite the fact that there are many tests today that are faster and cheaper that do not require the use of animals, there are multiple cosmetic companies that still support animal cruelty. One type of test that is done on animals is the acute toxicity test. It determines the toxic consequences of a single, short-term exposure to a product. They are given to animals in high doses by force-feeding, inhalation, or absorption through the skin. Also, companies often use rabbits, because their eyes are similar to the human eye. They use rabbits to test their perfumes and makeup products to see if they are eye irritants. The animals go through severe abdominal pain, convulsions, seizures, and/ or paralysis. (peta.org). If cosmetic companies keep using the same type of animals for their tests, there will not be many of those animals left in the world. Eventually, leading to extinction. What they do not realize is that all living organisms and their environments are all interconnected. The worldwide web is interdependent. If one species goes extinct, it will start a domino effect and it is destined in the end to influence us. Small changes lead to big problems that are not a quick fix. The loss of one type of creature can upset the planet’s