Having Strong Sources In Research

Wikipedia is a collaborative resource, which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the use of Wikipedia for scholarly research, the kind, which I will be utilizing throughout the rest of my MBA program. I will be evaluating Wikipedia based on the parameters set forth by Brenda Spatt. The credentials, Impartiality, style/tone, and currency of Wikipedia will all be examined in this paper (Spatt 2011).

When students are doing research on the internet, Wikipedia is usually one of the first site to appear. For students, the site is usually tempting to click, but they are quickly reminded by their teachers that Wikipedia should not be used as a site of knowledge. They label the site as inaccurate, unreliable, and uncreditable. In Boyd’s article she writes that teachers consistently tell students to stay clear of Wikipedia at all cost. Students should not have to see the site as tempting. They should be allowed to use it and embrace the site. Wikipedia has so much educational potential and should not be ignored by teachers. Boyd also writes that some analyses have shown that Wikipedia’s content is just as creditable as, if not more reliable than, more traditional resources.

During college, students should be able to research and analyze their sources. It is an important life skill. By using the ability to research, they can find articles with credible, reliable, and relevant information to get the best and dependable research. People who use these techniques will find each of these components essential to the authenticity of an article. These skills would be able to help students and researchers discover trustworthy and reliable sources. Each of the different components in a quality research makes it solid and dependable. Credibility is how believable or truthful the research, and whether the researchers have the credentials to do research in that area. Reliability is the reputation of the article’s source, and if the authors considered any biases. Relevancy is how current the article is or how important it is now. Students conducting research in college need to be able to critically analyze sources for credibility, relevancy, and reliability in order to determine their usefulness in a research paper.

When writing any kind of paper or essay, it is essential that you give Plagiarism is a serious credit to the sources that you use; you do this by appropriately citing these sources in parenthetical citations within your paper and in a academic violation. reference list at the end of the paper. Failing to appropriately cite To avoid plagiarism, sources—either intentionally or unintentionally—is a serious academic violation called plagiarism. You should never represent someone else’s use this rule of thumb: work or ideas as your own. Any time you have taken a statement, a When in doubt, cite it. fact, or even an idea from another author, you must cite it. A good rule to go by is that if you are in doubt about

In this paper I will be discussing the debate between pro Wikipedia’s Dwight Reed, and Rachel R. Wright, and con Wikipedia’s Nicole Irwin, Michelle Douglas, and Ivy Leigh. During the debate between Learning Team B members we debated over different points of views regarding Wikipedia as a reliable source.

I am glad you were able to find information redarding your topic. I ran into a few issues, but I shortened my rearch to just two or three words and was able to find sources. I like how you mentioned that it made your thesis statement stronger. I feel that the annotated bibliography strengthed mine as well. If I wasn't able to find creditable sources I would have changed my thesis statement. I will be adding the annotated bibliography to my writing process for persuasive/research writing.

To make sure sources are credible is making sure they are peer-reviewed scholarly journals, especially a journal which was evaluated by other experts in the field or topic you are researching for. Also, checking to see if the author which wrote the source is affiliated with other institutions or universities, the source should be timely written, be intended for scholarly audiences, and appropriate for the field or topic.

In the article “Age of Revolution: Wikipedia: Ok to use?” by Godwin Carter (2015) has written that is the Wikipedia website reasursable to take information from it or not. A lot of internet users are getting to know that they have been working on the Wikipedia to take information from because it has the newest version of the articles or the researches of their articles. Although, this website have massive potential complication is that anyone has been able to editing the information from other sources and see how much the mistakes are made by the non-professional people. Because that anybody should use it carefully and not just to takes any unreliable sources and needs to be focused in the articles which have written by the person who is

Wikipedia is a website that people use as a resource for many reasons. Such as, proving they’re correct in an argument, academic reason, or just for fun. Though the entries on Wikipedia can be created and edited by almost anyone. Therefore, it is a not credible source.

While during the research process, I used different types of resources to help me find sources. I used a librarian name Sarah Claudie, who showed me how to find popular sources Academic sources, print sources, and internet sources because I was confused on the differences between them. Another Source I

After looking up the sources, Dustin mainly used sources that were books or scholarly journals. This shows me that I need to look for creditable sources not just the first link Google gives me. I also should be use a variety of source like books, scholarly journals, professional sites, etc.

I recently read an article written by Neil L Waters called “Why You Can’t Cite Wikipedia in My Class”. The comment that Neil Waters made about how Wikipedia may lead to a citable source, is reason enough to use Wikipedia. Wikipedia itself is a website that can help with writing a paper and not hinder it. For example, when you are looking for information on Wikipedia it bluntly tells the reader that Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia which will allow anyone to edit or submit an article. Wikipedia is the largest and most known websites to obtain a reference from. Due to the fact that anyone can add what they assume is important makes the website credibility questionable. This is why most professors do not allow it as a reference when writing a paper. Neil wrote an article about why students were not allowed to use Wikipedia in his class. He stated his students are responsible for the accuracy of information they provide, and they cannot point to Wikipedia or any similar source that may appear in the future to escape the consequences of errors. He even went on the further explain that Wikipedia is not an acceptable citation, even though it may lead one to a suitable

Referencing is an important part of academic writing it demonstrates that credible articles are being used and it also assists the student in avoiding plagiarism. This case study will critique the reference list of a student’s assessment showing how one of the reference used is from a scholarly source while also demonstrating how another article is from a non-scholarly source. This will be done by using evidence to support these choices this includes methods such as explaining primary and secondary research articles, taking note of the currency, assessing whether the author is from a reputable background in regards to qualifications and their area of expertise and checking whether the author or article has a bias or agenda. While making sure

In evaluating sources, multiple requirements are needed to be checked in order to confirm that it is, indeed, a credible source to use in an essay. Ideology, relevance, reliability, credibility, timeliness, and diversity all play a role in finding the perfect website or book to quote from or use as an example. If a sources has none of these, it is a completely unreliable source and does not need to be included in an essay due to the fact that it will only cause the paper to be unreliable.

The Wikipedia is a free, online encyclopedia that lets every individual with Internet connection write and edits its articles. Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched their creation in 2001 giving an opportunity to all willing people to work together to develop a common resource of knowledge. Many people have different believes and ideas about Wikipedia, therefore, some tend to think of it as a credible and valid source of information, others strongly disagree. “Since all the books and articles have been chosen for publication, each one has presumably undergone some form of selection and review” (Spatt, 2011, “p.”339-340). Unfortunately, this statement is simply not enough to