Health Care Adoption Paper

This document outlines the conversion to an electronic health records system for Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin. It is important to note that the conversion process is only the beginning. The process must be clear and understandable to all members of the organization. Members must be trained extensively and retrained on an ongoing basis. Changes must be made in a well thought out manner and this must be communicated effectively to the members that are affected. The effectiveness of the system should be monitored and evaluated regularly and those that do not comply must be disciplined properly.

This Stage 1 started from 2011-2012, its objective dealt with data capture and sharing, these sheets are providing these services to assist professionals and hospitals understand the requirements of each objective and demonstrate meaningful use success. This stage also allows qualified providers to receive their payment after fulfilling nine core objectives and one public health objective. The second stage of the Meaningful Use is Stage 2 started in 2014; it dealt with the advanced clinical processes. This Stage introduces new aims and measures, as well as higher entries; it also required health care providers to prolong EHR capabilities to a greater portion of their patient populations. The last stage of the Meaningful Use is Stage 3, this Stage it still in a building phase. Its objective will be focusing on improving quality, safety, efficiency, and leading to improved outcomes. Even though the details of this program have not been finalized, Meaningful Use Stage 3 will work to make the program easier to understand. It will provide the professionals (EPs) and hospitals the ability to exchange and use information between electronic health records, and improve patient outcomes. Based on the current timeline, healthcare providers have the choice to begin Stage 3 Meaningful Use in 2017 but are not permitted to use it until

Despite some barriers and challenges of EHR adoption, transitioning our office to paperless has become inevitable. Timely adoption of EHR would help our clinic receive incentives, merge paper records into the new database, and better organize patient information. In order to ensure the most seamless implementation possible, meticulous planning will be a must.

The American health care system is in the midst of a paradigm shift as it transitions away from a paper documentation system towards a total electronic world. The electronic health record is revolutionizing the way health care practitioners, organizations and patients utilize patient information resulting in more efficient and accurate care, which implies better patient outcomes. In an effort to expedite the adoption of the electronic medical record, the United States government implemented an act entitled Meaningful Use which outlines three stages required by all health care systems and providers. The United States government provided financial incentives to ensure that these stages were met. It is imperative that the health care leaders are familiar with the requirements of Meaningful Use and create a timeline to ensure meeting all expectations. This paper will address the history of meaningful use implementation, meaningful use goals, and careful considerations for the health care leaders.

Making the switch to an electronic medical records system will help to bring forth health care advances with the systems data quality and availability. This research study uses focus groups and surveys to get the opinions of different health care providers and some patients on what they think EMR will do for the health care industry. Literature related to EMR was reviewed to get a better understanding of the benefits and barriers of electronic medical records. The study uses data from

EMR concerns are plaguing the health care industry today that requires change. Healthcare professionals, such as nurses, are on the front lines in the defense against medical errors. Closing the gap between current clinical and hospital practices and the various approaches to improving patient safety requires changes that are cultural and systemic in nature. The greatest challenge to hospitals using an EMR system is the expense of the new system, and the challenge nurses face with technology adoption in usage of EMR and protection of records. Even though spending depends on both the hospital size and the technologies were chosen, implementation and installation of a Health Information Technology system, which includes EMR, are often multi-year investments. The transition from a paper-based system to an electronic system is a very complicated process within every hospital establishment. The transformation is time-consuming and involves numerous staff from across the hospital, including Information Technology personnel, physicians, nurses, ancillary providers, etc. Although hospitals work hard at managing the changes required to move toward an electronic environment, there is no guarantee that hospital personnel will properly utilize the expensive new IT system or EMR. Therefore, the training in the EMR integration is required to all medical staff to have an efficient and uncomplicated system.

Medical care is making a switch to Electronic Health Records. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology provided incentives to hospitals and other medical institutions to use electronic health records for "Meaningful Use" (Saba

The goals put into place have to be practical, which would prove to the public that it is possible for their safety to become a priority. Moreover, the cons about Electronic Health Records can be reduced with further research. Patient safety and medical errors are factors that concern the public; therefore, researching to collect more information to better the two factors would assure patients to feel much safer (Brown, Shaw, Grimm, Muttitt, and Gebran, 2008). In order to face the factors affecting the uptake of EHRs performance, a research study with quantitative and qualitative methods should be conducted (Brown, Shaw, Grimm, Muttitt, and Gebran, 2008). Researching EHRs can help discover things that the government or other health care organizations were not aware of prior to introducing the equipment. Therefore, with the aid of further research, current and future findings can be

Despite the benefits of Electronic Medical Records (EMR), several challenges occur with the implementation. Some of the challenges are usability, technical ability, privacy concerns, cost and the people. Addressing these challenges in the planning stages of implementation can create a better outcome. The challenge differs depending on the facility and the clinician. The administrator assesses the staff’s level of computer literacy, the availability of high-speed internet access, the readiness of the facility, and financial viability and practice priorities. It very important to consider the usability challenges when planning to implement the use of EMR systems.

Due to conditions previously presented, the use of a paper-based recording is no longer adequate in today’s health care setting. Henceforth, health professionals are required to implement a device that can provide clinical decision-support capabilities, access to accurate and relevant patient data, patient safety and enhance the quality of healthcare delivery. Therefore, the electronic health record was established to address the deficiencies of paper-based records.

Finally, ternary care is care provided to patients by a team of specialist in a major hospital. Primary, secondary, and ternary facilities all use Electronic Health Records to track and store Electronic Medical Records. Users of Electronic Health Records were found to be used not only by health care professionals, but also by administrative staff and patients. Impact of Electronic Health Records was based on data and information quality. The study’s main interest was the impact to quality that EHR’s had on health care institutions. The study showed that there was no impact in time saving in documentation record keeping. However, the study did show that time was saved when information systems were used. For example, computerized nursing documents and physician orders improved communication between nurses and physicians which saved time in providing adequate patient care. In conclusion the focus of the study was to establish the need for Electronic Health Record adoption in primary, secondary, and ternary health care systems. However, different types of EHR systems and the needs of different health care professionals and consumers in the adoption and development of future Electronic Health Record

Electronic Health Records (EHR) transition from paper to electronic has necessitated a “hybrid” environment. The combination of paper, EHR, and document imaging (scanning) is causing challenges for Health Information Managers (HIM). Paper forms are

Health care organizations that choose to convert to an electronic medical record system (EMR) have several advantages; most important it increases patient safety, efficiency, cost-effectiveness and security. Accepting such a transition also presents with its share of challenges like preparing for the required significant time obligation and resources that will make the transition a successful one. Leadership and management must create an atmosphere that will get the buy-in of all stakeholders. Providing information about the process and what methods will be best to make the conversion to an EMR system is an important aspect of the implementation

When transitioning to an EHR system we need to make sure that we follow a plan that will make it a successful transition. Our plan will consist of 10 steps, these include, 1. Create the EHR core team, 2. Take charge of the planning process, 3. Map workflow processes: watch, ask, and Document the flow of informatioln, 4. Build our strategic plan, 5. Determine our specialty-specific clinical and fucntional elements and care goals, 6. Putting science and security to work in the selection process, 7. Narrow the selection, send RFI, specify demo criteria, 8. Build our budget, 9. Schedule a vendor site visit, and 10. Negotiate the contract (Hartley & Jones, 2012). To measure and manage performance during our transition to the new EHR we will educate our team on strengths and challenges, identify

Many health care organizations have already invested considerably in implementing administrative information systems and a handful of clinical applications. They are now wrestling with how to successfully expand their clinical information system capabilities in an effort to improve patient safety, increase health care quality, and decrease costs. Examples of clinical information system expansion include everything from computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems to bar-coding medication administration systems to fully electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Health system organizations continue to move forward with the adoption and implementation of electronic clinical information systems that promote patient safety. Physicians have also begun to invest in health care information systems, including EMRs, but most are in large practices of fifty or more providers. Health