Minneapolis HIAs HIA (health impact assessment) is generally defined as a public decision-making tool that assesses the health impact of a project/policy before its implementation. A good HIA would take both policy and research inputs into consideration, thus maximizing the positive health impact while minimizing the negative impact. In this section, we have chosen two typical HIAs from the various HIA practices in Minneapolis, Minnesota to explore. Above the falls - health impact assessment - Ensuring Health Equity in Decision-Making The Above the Fall plan aims to develop sustainable green facilities along the Minneapolis’ upper riverfront area. The vision of this plan includes new parks, trails, redevelopment and related amenities in the riverfront area. This HIA chose to focus on four main decision alternatives of the ATF plan and assess their health impacts. These four alternatives include: 1) increasing the size of parkland; 2) extending the length of trails; 3) creating long-term employment opportunities; and 4) creating additional housing units. The health indicators they chose include obesity, mental health, environmental quality, safety and security, neighborhood cohesion, and employment. This report predicts the impact of ATF to these indicators based on related literatures and existing conditions. 1. Obesity The existing condition of this area has indicated that the riverfront is a popular destination for the exercise of local residents. Many previous studies
This public health policy paper will discuss and outline the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as well as barriers and controversies surrounding the policy and its relevance in nursing profession. The ACA will eventually affect everyone. Statistics reflecting United States health outcomes have proven the need for the initiation of policy formation within the United States healthcare system. “In March 2010, President Obama signed into law a comprehensive health reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).” (Estes, Chapman, Dodd, Hollister, Harrington, 2013, p. 144) The ACA promotes preventive care—including related services and family planning—that should result in improved health outcomes and
The health status of the population in the United States is a national priority. The Healthy People 2020 outlines priorities and to improve the health of individuals and communities across the country. Healthy People 2020 is defined as a comprehensive set of national objectives for “improving the health of all Americans” (Healthy People 2020, n.d, para. 1). The Healthy people 2020, is aimed at improving the health of individuals and communities and envisions “a society in which all people live long, healthy lives” (Healthy People 2020, n.d, para 4). A short priority list was developed and contains twenty-six objectives knowns as Leading Health Indicators (LHI). The list of objectives was created to prioritize health issues that must be addressed and to find appropriate actions to take in order to improve the health of the population.
In order to first start a policy process, the problem for which a policy is to be created must be identified and the policy holding a solution to the problem. Researchers and stakeholders will investigate the problem to identify if the policy will reach the policy making agenda. Policies must be to improve society’s health and wellbeing. In the United States (U.S.) public health related issues that require a formulation of a new policy and come from local, state, or federal legislations which ruling govern the provision of health care services and regulations. In this
HC1: Public health is here to assist in the prevention of disease, promote health and continually adding longevity to life (WHO, 2015). It is broken down into a few different functions. There are assessments and monitoring of different health communities and the populations which are at risk (WHO, 2015). Second, would be how policies are designed to solve certain problems on the local and national levels (WHO, 2015). And last, would be to make sure that all populations have adequate access to health care and that it is cost effective (WHO, 2015). Quality improvements is increasing its approach to get maximize services that will be effective while also minimizing the costs (HHS, 2011). When making improvements one must first identify strategies and characteristics that are essential to the concern (HHS, 2011). Once that is completed, apply the quality improvements to produce a measurable improvement (HHS, 2011). This will show whether there were improvements in efficiency, effectiveness as well as performance and outcomes (HHS, 2011). Another improvement would be making the role that environmental health has to give more of an impact in public
NU 412 Health Policy Week 3 Discussion Board response student response to Carla Fisher by Kathryn Moultrie
“For over 60 years, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been dedicated to protecting health and promoting quality of life through the prevention and control of disease, injury, and disability,” (CDC, 2012, p. 1). The organization has a focus of decreasing the health and economic disadvantages of the principal reasons of demise and incapacity through diverse programs, thus safeguarding an extended, prolific, vigorous life for people, (CDC, 2012). This paper will expound on The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and it is enhancement to the fundamental operations
The first child to ever be from using test tube techniques happened in the late 1970’s. Although many have applauded this new type of technology, there is an ethical issue on whether or not embryos should be created in test-tube knowing that fact that many are not implanted and have human development. “Octo-Mom” is a classic case that may have changed many people’s perception when it comes to in-vitro fertilization. Many felt that it was ethically wrong for her doctor to conduct that type of procedure to a woman who will not have the ability to provide adequate care for the well-being of her children who may have health issues.
A major influence on health in a community is the availability of services and opportunities within the neighborhood. Public health can be further influenced by the social environments. Accessibility to health care along with education and employment opportunities are fundamental factors to be considered (Riegelman & Kirkwood, 2015). These elements create both advantages and disadvantages for those living within the neighborhood. If we want to improve public health outcomes, we must consider and evaluate these along with many other contributing factors.
House Resolution (H.R.) 370 was introduced to Congress on January 9th, 2017 by Republican Rep. Bill Flores of Waco, Texas. The bill itself is quite simple, totaling two pages in length. The main purpose of the bill is repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), completely restoring or reviving the laws it amended as if it had never existed. Unlike similar repeals to the ACA, this bill does not have a replacement plan or any sort of alternate plan. It simply takes the ACA away and restores the law to their pre-ACA state. This is concerning for many reasons, but it may also have some benefits as well. The future of America’s health care is ever changing and it is more important
We received a meeting request from the David A. Winston Health Policy Fellowship, which was submitted to the Acting Administrator. To ensure that there are no objections to this request and to be certain that all meetings are free of conflict and legal disputes, we are putting this request through the external meeting vetting process.
In 2010, the Affordable Care Act invoked a $75 millon dollar demonstration project known as the Medicad Emergency Psychiatric Demonstration that was amended in section 2707 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The change seemed to be just what the nation needed, however, there was fine print added to the amendment that changed the interpretation. The fine print stated, patients who are on Medicaid from the ages of 21-65 seeking inpatient mental health care can receive treatment under the law. However, the inpatient facility will receive no
Many of the issues with both nutrition and physical activity can be directly connected to flaws in urban design. It is evident that built environments can effect and has affected physical activity, sedentary behaviors and physical fitness, and consequently health. (10) “Studies on sprawl and public health have found that increased levels of sprawl are associated with increased obesity, decreased physical activity and poorer health.” (9)
Lake City is an established neighborhood in northeast Seattle with a population of 39,939 as of 2013 (Demographic Now 2015). The borders of Lake City from south to north are from 95th Street to 145th Street and from Lake Washington to 15th Street going east to west. Walking, driving, and data retrieval comprised the survey of this area. The purpose of this paper is to identify potential community health issues that may impact the residents as a whole.
The convenience of living in an urban or suburban neighborhood can be appealing to many people. Choosing between areas can sometimes be overwhelming for some individual. People are not only concerned about the safety of a community, but they are also concerned about the environment. Although some neighborhoods might look attractive, people should consider the expense that comes with it, and how commuting will affect them in the long run. Nevertheless, both neighborhoods have their specific advantages and disadvantages. When choosing between an urban or suburban neighborhood, it is important for people to research the community, the expense, and convenience
The competency, “Analyze determinants of health and disease using an ecological framework” was met through the exercise, “Health Problem Analysis Worksheet” and through reading Chapter 2 in the book Public Health: What it is and How it Works.