Health Systems Thinking

1. System Thinking: System thinking is nothing but instead of focusing on only one particular issue, we have to analyze and try to understand the entire system on the whole. With this kind of analyzation, we can easily find a solution to the problem as the problems are not confined to only a particular area or time. We might find a solution for a particular issue, somewhere in the whole system by analyzing the entire system completely. We should try to relate the actions and the consequences on the whole as the issues occur at different time levels, not confined to only one particular time level. We have to have knowledge of the relation between different departments of an organization and the relation between them and the functionality between the departments as to how they are related in an organization. We generally focus on only one particular issue rather than seeing the bug picture and that shouldn’t be done. In system thinking we analyze the big picture.

The implementation of systems thinking can have both a positive and negative effect on staff, which varies from one member to another. If the process of implantation is handled correctly, the overall outcome will be positive. However, more established staff members may be reluctant to change; this will therefore have a negative impact. The introduction of system thinking will require new ways of thinking. Additionally, staff may require training, due to the fact that systems thinking is likely to involve a more collaborate approach to problem solving through teamwork, with which some may not be familiar with.

Johnson (2006) eloquently talks about healthcare systems as “cumbersome, unwieldy, unfriendly and opaque to its users” (Johnson, 2006, p. i10). It is the challenge of this post to take the clinical microsystem where I practice, the HIV Health Service Center clinic, and discuss the interrelationships of this microsystem to the microsystems of other primary care clinics in the county system. The main role of the mesosystem is to support the microsystems. According to Bronfenbrenner’s ecological system’s theory, the mesosystem contains the relationship between two systems, or between the primary care clinics in the county system and the macrosystem which contains both the microsystem and the mesosystem. Moreover, the Multnomah County Health Department could be identified as the macrosystem here or we could identify the larger state system as the macrosystem. Communication between systems is an area that could be enhanced to improve overall functioning of the clinics.

visual of how to interpret their consumer 's life. System theories is one way to try to

A system is a collection of components that cohere in a pattern or structure to produce a function or outcome. They can have any number of defining characteristics. Systems can even be multi level, with sub systems differing structure wise. Health care is a great example of complex additive system phenomenon. The modern systems are composed of various interacting and interconnected professions, managers and policy makers, artefacts and technologies. These services include various sectors like mental health care, aged care, alternative medicine etc. Study over psychiatric impatient unit were conducted, and even included the staff and the social network analysis. The entire analysis revealed that, a considerate and a repeated effort should be

System theory includes ecological systems, and it typically focuses on how different individuals interact with others in their environment (Turner, 2014). In fact, social workers use this theory in understanding different individuals while in their constant transaction within their environment. For example, system theory suggests that different systems and subsystems in the societies are interrelated parts. Also, the other common concept of system theory states that each subsystem affects several other areas of

Systems considering: It is the theoretical structure for the book. Framework considering joins the other four guideline of individual authority, mental models, building shared vision and group learning. It means to take a gander at the master plan and to not look for basic arrangements that will tackle today 's issue yet which make a greater issue later on (Cropper, 2012).

Recently, there have been recommendations for the incorporation of systems thinking into global health. Russell et al. (2014) contended that systems thinking offers the principles and methods necessary to address existing and future health challenges in global health. Thus, there is justification for using open systems theory as the basis for the organizing framework which consists of input, process, output, and a feedback loop. The concepts in

The approach of systems thinking is fundamentally different from that of traditional forms of analysis. Traditional analysis focuses on the separating the

Donella Meadows explains, “The systems-thinking lens allows us to reclaim our intuition about whole systems and hone our abilities to understand parts, see interconnections, ask “what if” questions about possible future behaviors, and be creative and courageous about system redesign” (Meadows, 2008: p.6).

The concept of systems thinking started in the 1920’s and was considered a fundamental aspect of several disciplines, most notably among them the fields of engineering and biology, and scholars in these fields noted in their observations that there were many aspects of which scientific analysis could not explore. Most scientists use a tool called the Scientific Method, popularized by Karl Popper from his ideas from his work in 1938-1963. His idea of practicing science is to formulate a hypothesis, try to prove it wrong, and then from your results form a new hypothesis (2014, Weaver).

System thinking is one of the largest breakthroughs in understanding change in an organization. In order to understand how it’s used, one must understand the system and how its parts interact or affect each other. System thinking is known as a form of critical thinking. Thinking critically is important in change and in the process of being competitive in the industry. System thinking is a way of solving problem as practices with involves specific problems. This helps to understand the people and situations are used to influence the system.

Population health in the U.S has recently improved, as strategic management in health system develops. The United States has overtime experienced changes in the health system and services as the population increases and demand for healthcare. The regional balancing in rural and urban healthcare development and management is a major concern in initiating management systems. The healthcare insurance has defined policies, irrespective of the population background. This requires strategic management system in healthcare to provide affordable health services with objective equity distribution of health policies and equipment in rural areas as in urban regions (Montoya, Trilling, Monteiro, Viallon, & Albert, 2014). Through the strategic management, the population health gain would be achieved to all United States citizens irrespective of their backgrounds. Public health provides insights to health system management on appropriate methods, current practices and relating the community health improvement in the United States.

Systems Theory presents the idea that all organizations and their “parts” are systems that exist in relation to each other, and that the attitudes and actions of the different parts of the system affect not only the other parts of the organization (or system), but the system as a whole as well. Systems Theory presents two types of systems, open and closed. An open system reacts, listens to, and embraces its publics, both internal and external, while a closed system doesn’t acknowledge their publics in decision making. A closed system takes note of past decisions and mainly examines the past in decision making, not it’s publics.

A system is an interconnected set of elements that is coherently organized in a way that achieves something. “If you look at the definition closely for a minute, you can see that a system must consist of three kinds of things: elements, interconnections and a function or purpose.” (Meadows. D, 2009). Others have come up with similar definitions of systems, including: Senge (2012) suggested that the discipline of systems thinking is useful for seeing and understanding wholes, interrelations and change patterns. Second is roundtable theory which is a shared leadership theory for school change. Gabriele (2002) explained that involving stakeholders in the decision-making process through shared leadership can lead to higher levels of commitment. Lastly Argyris and Schon (1978) argued that organizational learning was critical to an organization’s survival. They argued that Double-Loop learning was the most effective way of making informed decisions about the way we design and carry out the action in achieving organization learning.