Healthcare in the Us vs Healthcare in the Uk Essay

Furthermore, the United States spends nearly double the average $3,923 for the 15 countries ("Health Care Cost," 2011).” Accordingly the U.S. throws away more money than any other country on healthcare which consequently could jeopardize the medical attention that is being provided.

The economics of healthcare is not at all simple. What you put in is certainly not necessarily indicative of what you get out, as shown by the striking discrepancy between what we pay and what we get out of our healthcare system. This is demonstrated further by comparing our system to those of France and Italy, who come in first and second, respectively, in WHO’s international ranking of healthcare systems (“World Health Organization’s Ranking of the World’s Health Systems”). Counter to what many Americans may believe, a number of European nations do not have completely socialized medicine.

Universal Healthcare sounds appealing, but it actually lowers the quality and quantity of healthcare services that are rendered to patients, thus downgrading the healthcare system as a whole.  Not having to pay, with everyone having coverage leads to longer wait times for medical service and many people overusing health care services. Implementation of Universal Healthcare in the United States would lead to a detrimental crippling of the nation’s health system. For those countries that have implemented Universal Healthcare or a system similar to it, all or most aspects of the coverage such as cost and care is generally provided by and tightly controlled by the government, a public-sector committee, or employer-based programs, with most of the funding essentially coming from tax revenues or budget cuts in other areas of spending. This paper will conclude with comparing the US healthcare system to others and how the US has one of the most advanced systems in the world.

The United States health care system ranks 37th in the world. Statistically, it’s bizarre how United States is amongst one of the most advanced nations in the world and the fact that it spends more on its healthcare

The country that I pick to compare to the U.S. healthcare system is Great Britain.

The healthcare policies in Mexico and the United States are similar in that both healthcare systems utilize a combination of public and private insurance (freecontentweb.com). Healthcare has rapidly become an important topic in many countries. This comparison will focus on similarities in healthcare reform, healthcare insurance availability, healthcare access, and healthcare cost of both countries. Prior to healthcare reform in the US and Mexico, millions of people did not have access to health care due to the cost and lack of insurance. Healthcare reform was established to improve the accessibility, affordability, and quality of health care in both countries. Even though health care reform made insurance coverage available in both the private and public sector, access of care is limiting. As a result, patients find it difficult to get appointments when they need care. In addition, many patients continue to struggle with the cost of healthcare. Although both countries have some similarities related to healthcare, obvious differences exist.

There are many problems with healthcare in America today. One of them including the astronomical cost. According to CDC.ORG in 2007 the average person spends seven thousand four hundred dollars per year on health care alone. This rise in healthcare is extremely detrimental for families, seniors, and people of all ages. With such a high cost of insurance people are forced to make hard choices in

“Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.”

The U.S. is an industrialized nation that continues to be behind on providing health care coverage to all citizens. However, the German health care system came up with a plan that ensured all citizens are provided with some form of health care coverage; nevertheless, the U.S. continues to dispute health care reform and how to provide coverage to all citizens. “Health spending per capita in the United States is much higher than in other countries – at least $2,535 dollars, or 51%, higher than Norway, the next largest per capita spender. Furthermore, the United States spends nearly double the average $3,923 for the 15 countries ("Health Care Cost," 2011, table 1)”.

This video Sick Around the World was extremely interesting to learn how countries in different parts of the world have designed their health care systems to benefit their citizens while still being feasible for that country. At first, I was skeptical that any of these models could actually work for the United States but after watching the video, there is one that may work if it was adjusted carefully to fit America's need. I believe that the health care system that would possibly work in America would be the model that the British government uses. In the video, a British Doctor states they they pay for everyone's health care using one half of the amount of money that Americans spend per person. They don't have co-pays or fees for their health

In terms of healthcare, which country has a better healthcare system? Every country has a different way of how their healthcare system works, but we can all learn from each other to better our health care system for the people. The healthcare regulations and policies should be in a way where it works for the economy as a whole and not for some classes. In this report it will cover the points of how the United Kingdom has a better healthcare system than the United States. The similarities and differences in the healthcare system of both countries will be discussed to fully understand why I believe the UK healthcare system is better than the US.

The United States and the United Kingdom are very different countries. They have fish n’ chips, we have a burger and fries. They drink tea and we drink coffee. They follow football and we follow (American) football. In terms of healthcare, we are still just as different. The United States healthcare is run by private sectors and the United Kingdom healthcare system is run by the government. People are able to make money off of insurance companies in the U.S. and you can’t make money off the healthcare system of the U.K.. This is why, economically speaking, the United States healthcare system is better. In terms of economics, the United States is a better healthcare system because how it is run.

This paper outlines the differences between the healthcare systems of the United States and the United Kingdom and expands on what that means for the health and wealth of the citizens of these countries. The U.S. and the U.K. are two different countries with two very different healthcare systems. The U.S. healthcare system is the Affordable Care Act, (ACA) and is the attempt by the U.S. to provide affordable healthcare coverage. he U.K. healthcare system is publicly financed and managed by the National Health Service, (NHS). The U.S. healthcare system is largely private sector whereas the healthcare in the U.K. is public. “The U.S. spends more on health care than any other country in the nation while the U.K. is a country that spends

Regarding the conditions Marmot outlines, Oliver and Marsland appraise the UK system in their publications for Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law and The Lancet respectively. Oliver shows comprehensive care as the most effective in cost, coverage, and equity by weighing the pros and cons of universal care. Following, he discusses the economic aspects of healthcare affecting the United States. Marsland admits the strength of the UK health scheme, yet he contends socialized medicine as the cause and accentuates adversity in the UK system from its induction till it launched major reforms in the 1980s as discussed by Oliver. Both sources admit faults in the UK system.

The healthcare systems throughout the world differ exponentially. Some countries have nationalized healthcare, such as the United Kingdom, others have a mixed system (the United States) and still others depend more on privatized healthcare. It is necessary to compare systems throughout nations in order to see if there may be any applicability to the U.S. system. These methods could greatly improve the delivery of healthcare in the U.S. if they are truly feasible and would create a better model for the country. The countries that are being explored are Chile, Colombia, Ghana, Italy, Japan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.