preview

Hearst Vs Hylan

Decent Essays
Open Document

Span claims that the real villains existed in New York: Mayor John. F. Hylan and William Randolph Hearst. Hylan had been fired from Kings County Elevated Railway in 1897, and was believed to have had his own personal animosity toward transit companies (Span). In the 1920s, many transit companies had a standard five-cent fare that could no longer pay their extensive bills. Streetcars were required to pay fixed franchise fees as well as provide street sweeping and snow clearance. This, combined with fixed fairs, put transit companies under terrible financial pressure (Span). Meanwhile, Hearst’s paper stirred up public animosity towards the streetcars (Span). Hylan refused to aid transit companies in the face of bankruptcy (Span). Gerhard Dahl, president of Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation, wrote a letter to Hylan: In 1925, the New York Railways removed 46 miles of tracks to substitute buses. Span argues that the political battle between railways and buses had already been fought by the time General Motors got involved, influencing the type of …show more content…

Bus lines were less expensive to build and operate than rails and trolleys. Therefore, extending service to rapidly growing suburbs could be accomplished quickly and inexpensively, since there was no need to construct additional rail lines (Slater). Slater also notes the development of the modern bus. Unlike the streetcar, which made no significant technical advances during the 1920s, the bus made substantial improvements in speed, handling, and comfort, which attracted new ridership (Slater). One of the biggest expenses for public transportation is operator labor, so vehicle speed is critical. Buses were 50% faster, meaning that the cost per passenger of the operator’s time was one-third less

Get Access