Heart of Darkness, a novel by Joseph Conrad provides an in depth perspective of the imperialism that invaded the Congo in the 1800’s. Marlow, our narrator, tells of his journey sailing up the Congo river in search of the most luxurious item of the time--Ivory. While sailing this twisting and deeply mystical river, Marlow hears of Kurtz, a man with a admirable reputation within their workplace known as the Company. As Marlow travels further along the Congo river he notices a distinct change of scenery. The river acts similar to a reverse timeline, and in the center of it all, lies a somewhat prehistoric culture that the Company is exploiting. Ironically, in the eyes of the Company the natives are being saved and given purpose in life, but in …show more content…
His flawed rationale of "humanizing, improving, instructing" served as the basis for his ironic downfall. Kurtz serves as the archetypical white savior yet Marlow, his unofficial protege, ultimately leads Kurtz to confront his own savagery. Joseph Conrad’s placement of imagery, irony, and juxtaposition allows the reader to discover the depth of Kurt’s character and the motivations behind his actions, making him seem human even in spite of his callous behavior.
The commander of the Company, Kurtz, is described through copious amounts of imagery that helps the reader depict the man behind all of the absurdity in the Congo. Kurtz is characterized as a towering man of great strength, but by the end of the novel he is ghastly and frail. Conrad's abundant use of imagery stresses how the darkness of Kurtz’s soul had physically manifested, resulting in a walking ghost. The imagery used by Conrad describes the Congolese as archaic, and by
…show more content…
From the start Conrad pictures England and Brussels as dismal despite sun being out. This imagery gives the reader a sense of Europe being an area of despair. On the other hand, Africa, lying in the heart of the equator is known for it’s intense sunshine. Europe’s invasion of Africa, acts like a virus invading the healthy. Conrad’s use of language asserts London as the “biggest” and “greatest” city of the world. Biggest in the sense physical size, and greatest in terms of power and influence. Because Conrad stresses this juxtaposition as a main theme of this work, the reader is able to see Kurtz’s actions as more normal that one might have at first. Kurtz’s domination of the natives appears brutal, but given Europe’s history of colonization Kurtz was not abnormal. Moreover, Kurtz was not immune to the violence he ignited, and felt the ramifications severely. His final quote “the horror, the horror” shows the readers that even though he was much to blame for the violence, this last words were spoken with guilt and anguish.
When the native boy finally announced his death, Kurtz lost everything that he once firmly believed to be his: his Intended, his ivory, his station, his river and so on though he seemed to be the most successful and capable man that Marlow met during his journey towards the Inner Station. If we take a look at some of the well-known politicians in the past century, we
Kurtz’s lack of restraint and hunger for ivory consumes not only his soul but drains all of his physical existence. Upon seeing him, Marlow states, “I could see the cage of his ribs all astir, the bones of his arm waving (126)”. Conrad focuses on the physical features of Kurtz to display the madness that has consumed him. However, though Kurtz’s body is deteriorating, Kurtz’s mind continues to thrive. Conrad shows this in Marlow’s shock of witnessing a flame of passion that remains in Kurtz’s eyes as he converses without signs of exhaustion (126). Conrad continues to describe Kurtz as a shadow composed of tranquility and satisfaction. Conrad’s incorporation of this detail signifies the evil and greed that consumes Kurtz and is reflected through his physique. However, the power of Kurtz’s presence is personified through the action of his words. As the strength in his voice captures Marlow’s attention, it merely reflects his influence upon his followers. The power reflected through his voice displayed his confidence as well as his position as a leader for the natives. Hi demeanor displays an air of arrogance that makes others feel less equal to him. Those who follow him fear him, but also continue to respect him.
Joseph Conrad's novella, Heart of Darkness, describes a life-altering journey that the protagonist, Marlow, experiences in the African Congo. The story explores the historical period of colonialism in Africa to exemplify Marlow's struggles. Marlow, like other Europeans of his time, is brought up to believe certain things about colonialism, but his views change as he experiences colonialism first hand. This essay will explore Marlow's view of colonialism, which is shaped through his experiences and also from his relation to Kurtz. Marlow's understanding of Kurtz's experiences show him the effects colonialism can have on a man's soul.
On the contrary, in Heart of Darkness, Conrad focuses on the isolation of “Kurtz” the, main man of the “Congo”. Conrad’s medium of the river plays a focal point in the setting as a boundary that separates Kurtz from civilization. The river “resembles an immense snake uncoiled, with its head in the sea, its body at rest curving afar over a vast country, and its tail lost in the depths of the land” (10). The expanse of the “snake-like” river embodies a negative connotation of something sinister and stealthily lurking. While the Congo had been described as being “one of the darkest places of the earth” (6). This creates feelings of darkness, despair and desolation.
Joseph Conrad 's Heart of Darkness is both a dramatic tale of an arduous trek into the Belgian Congo at the turn of the twentieth century and a symbolic journey into the deepest recesses of human nature. On a literal level, through Marlow 's narration, Conrad provides a searing indictment of European colonial exploitation inflicted upon African natives. By employing several allegoric symbols this account depicts the futility of the European presence in Africa.
The film also depicts the character of Kurtz in a very different light. Conrad builds up the appearance of Kurtz so much that his first scene is intentionally anti-climactic. He is discovered to be an ailing, elderly gentlemen, malnourished and on the verge of death. Marlow himself is simultaneously impressed with and disappointed by Kurtz. He enjoys listening to the old man’s philosophies, but he is let down by Kurtz’s lack of realistic thinking. He has clearly lost his mind, and with it, some of his credibility and mysticism.
Darkness is everything that is unknown, primitive, evil, and impenetrable. To Conrad, Africa is the very representation of darkness. Marlow often uses the phrase, “We penetrated deeper and deeper into the heart of darkness” (Conrad 68), to describe his progress on the Congo. By traveling farther and farther down the Congo, Marlow and his crew get closer and closer to the epicenter of this foreboding darkness, to the black heart of evil. Because of Africa’s physical immensity and thick jungles, it appeared to be a land of the unknown where “the silence . . . went home to one’s very heart—its mystery, its greatness, the amazing reality of its concealed life”(56). This portrayal of Africa as both a romantic frontier and a foreboding wilderness continues to dominate in the minds of Westerners even today.
In the late 1900s, most of the world’s “dark places” were being colonized by the European powers. A notable work written in this time period was Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, which provides a critical view of European imperial pursuits. However, Conrad’s work is much about heroism as it is imperialism. This character, Kurtz appears briefly but has a significant presence. As Marlow traveled along the Congo River, other characters of the book idolized and saw Kurtz’s potential for greatness along with his charm and ambition. Those qualities resulted in being Kurtz’s legacy instead of his madness and brutality. This was Conrad criticizing mankind’s blindness and their difficulty in understanding the world beyond themselves, and the ability of one man to
The final thing Kurtz had an affect on was the other characters development; specifically Marlow’s. Marlow spent his journey on the Congo listening to so many stories about Kurtz that he becomes obsessed with meeting him. At one point in the story, Marlow finds out there is a possibility that Kurtz is dead and he admits that, “For the moment that was the dominant thought. There was a sense of extreme disappointment, as though I had found out I had been striving after something altogether without a substance” (41). When Marlow finally meets Kurtz he is a little disappointed. He finds out that Kurtz actually isn’t as amazing as he expected. Marlow is thrown a back but doesn’t give up complete hope. When Kurtz dies, and says his final words, Marlow realizes that
The constant change in scenery throughout the Heart of Darkness contributes heavily to the meaning of the novel as a whole, for it allows the novel’s author, Joseph Conrad, to expand on the effects the physical journey of travelling through the Congo has on the inner mentailites of the characters- Marlow and Kurtz- in the novel. Conrad’s continuous comparisons between characters, their surroundings, and the plot, create the genuine progression of the novel, while the physical journey that is taken allows the characters to make their own discovery of humankind. As Kurtz’s destiny and the struggles he overcomes go on to deeply affect the two characters’ journey through the story’s plot, as everything in the Heart of Darkness is linked or comes back to Kurtz and all the wrongful actions he has committed in the Congo- as he was the perpetrator of all the darkness in the novel to begin with.
Darkness in the jungle is an evident motif presented in Conrad’s story. Marlow’s observations in his expedition down the steam river consistently exploit the perversion of European colonialism and the effects of imperialism on those who were enslaved. For example, the observation of a French warship firing its cannons ruthlessly in the inland despite that “there wasn’t even a shed there, and she was shelling the bush. It appears the French had one of their wars going on thereabouts” (Conrad, 20). This displays the madness of imperialist endeavors that existed to serve commercial interests. As Marlow continues to witness the moral corruption of the Europeans and the conquest of the natives, the perspective of the job he had so eagerly sought begins to break. His depiction of the natives that were coerced into labor performed to dehumanize their inland is explained when “they passed within six inches, without a glance, with that complete, deathlike indifference of unhappy savages” (Conrad, 23). The farther Marlow and his crew sail down the steam river, the closer they reach their end, but the more morally deceitful their mission becomes. Marlow reveals during their journey how they “penetrated deeper and deeper into the heart of darkness” (Conrad, 57). Conrad is constantly using “darkness” as a metaphor and as a realistic description of life under the dense jungle canopy. He describes Africa as “dark,” in terms of the actual absence of light beneath the heavily-canopied
The conquering of a place and its people does not just affect the land and its resources; it also affects those inhabiting it. Marlow describes the Congolese’s spirituality being oppressed, “The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking is away from those who have a different complexion of slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much.” (Conrad, 69). Marlow discusses his aunt’s thoughts on the process, “She talked about weaning those ignorant millions from their horrid ways.” He watches the Europeans using their own laws to control and oppress the people of the Congo, for example, he sees an ugly chain-gang at the first station, which does not seem as though they are criminals. Nevertheless, the European law had decided for the natives, Marlow describes, “like shells from the man-of-war, like an insoluble mystery from the sea. (Conrad, 12). The Congolese appointed to work on his ship, he describes as, still belonging, “to the beginnings of time,” but “as long as there was a piece of paper written over in accordance with some farcical law or other made down the river, it didn’t enter anybody’s head to trouble how they would live. (Conrad, 33-34). Skulls of then men judged by the European law were set on stakes around Kurtz’s
As Kurtz’s title grows, he is able to work his way into the natives’ minds. He becomes their leader, even though he is an outsider. Little does Marlow know, Kurtz’s corruptness and his imperialistic and colonialist efforts to rule the African land would become his demise. In the end, Marlow understands that Kurtz is not all he is made out to be, and finds that his practices are harsher than necessary as he reads in Kurtz’s book his plans to “Exterminate all the brutes!” (50). Kurtz is referring to the natives he befriends and uses to his advantage. While Marlow and Kurtz move throughout the Congo as foreigners of a “First World” country, the Natives of the Congo are forces reconcile with Kurtz’s colonization and rule of their land and over their people. What Conrad presents in Heart of Darkness are the dangers of naiveté regarding “First World” practices of imperialism and colonialism, and then becoming aware, as Marlow gradually does, of their implications.
Throughout the first two parts of Joseph Conrad's book, Heart of Darkness, the character Kurtz is built up to be this amazing and remarkable man. In the third book, however, we learn the truth about who Kurtz really is. Kurtz cries out in a whisper, "The horror! The horror!"(p. 86), and in only two words he manages to sum up the realization of all the horrors of his life during his time in the Congo.
Kurtz was a personal embodiment, a dramatization, of all that Conrad felt of futility, degradation, and horror in what the Europeans in the Congo called 'progress,' which meant the exploitation of the natives by every variety of cruelty and treachery known to greedy man. Kurtz was to Marlow, penetrating this country, a name, constantly recurring in people's talk, for cleverness and enterprise. Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness is a portrait of the degeneration of the ideal of Kurtz symbolizing the degeneration of the ideal of colonialism as 'civilizing work'.
He witnesses the heart of darkness. The absolutely corrupted evil mind by greed and thirst for power. Kurtz has become an insane godlike slaver and leader in a native African tribe. He developed extremely high level of self importance and as the result he disconnected with the world and reality. Although, Kurtz started out like Marlow, as noble conqueror. However, there was nobody to check on him, he had no supervisor and as Marlow often said - Kurtz could not restrain himself from the temptation. He entered a state of mind where had no borders anymore, slaying down other tribes and killing for wealth without showing any kind of remorse. For him it became normal or even natural. Kurtz's godlike side also prevails where he claims around him