Hemingway's Use of Economy In The End of Something Essay

Hemingway's third-person narration does not get in the way of Nick and Marjorie's dialogue, a device most writers would use to allow the reader to concentrate more on the complex nature of the conversation. However, the dialogue between Nick and Marjorie is quite simple. Their lines are usually one abrupt sentence (the longest sequence is Nick telling Marjorie that she knows everything, and even then his

Hemingway’s story relies primarily on dialogue. During the three page story, there are really only four sections that only provide description -- not counting small details like “he said” or “she said” or one sentence paragraphs like “The girl did not say anything” (Page 2). It is interesting that he chose to do this when considering it artistically. Descriptions of the characters, of the environment, of the objects people interact with are often major points of the story that reveal something to the reader. If nothing else, these descriptions fill out the story and make the world in which it is occurring feel real. Hemingway’s choice to use only dialogue shows the reader that they need to pay close attention to what the character’s are saying. The story lies in their words, not in the movements they make or how the

In the final analysis, Ernest Hemingway usage of dialogue and sensory detail allowed him to sustain the moods of apathetic and numbness throughout the short story. Hemingway has a style that not only leaves the reader wanting more but also having them satisfied with what occurred. Examining his use of dialogue and sensory details give the audience two other ways to appreciate his writing

Ernest Hemingway pulled from his past present experiences to develop his own thoughts concerning death, relationships, and lies. He then mixed these ideas, along with a familiar setting, to create a masterpiece. One such masterpiece written early in Hemingway's career is the short story, "Indian Camp." "Indian Camp" was originally published in the collection of "in Our Time" in 1925. A brief summary reveals that the main character, a teenager by the name of Nick, travels across a lake to an Indian village. While at the village Nick observes his father, who is a doctor, deliver a baby to an Indian by caesarian section. As the story continues, Nick's father discovers that the newborn's father has committed

Hemingway chose a unique approach to his story. Many short stories are filled with formal speech. However, Hemingway presented to us his story, without using exquisite words or elongated sentences. His writing was direct and minimal, but also precise. The author allowed us to create our own environment, by playing off common experiences in everyday life. By doing that he produced an atmosphere that can easily be fashioned and manipulated by the reader in order to create a relatable surrounding.

This shows that Nick is affects by the affairs of others and the emotions that they give off if tension between his two friends and his cousin managed to spoil the whole

This way, the author is able to give just the right amount of detail to the reader, but not too much. He does not spend time describing little details and leaves more of the imagining to the reader. Hemingway not only uses this stylistic approach to let the reader envision what they want, but to also demonstrate the simplicity that life can bring. Santiago, the “Old Man,” was an old fisherman who lived a simplistic life. He taught the young boy to fish, he had simple morals that he stuck to, and he loved to fish. Hemingway was a young novelist who lived a life of adventure and his public image influenced generations upon generations. He used the novel to convince the reader that there is a great deal to life - adventure is waiting to be sought out, there are people who are waiting to be met, and there is life waiting to be lived. Santiago is old and wise and had learned the value of life. Such knowledge he wanted to share to the reader, “He no longer dreamed of storms, nor of women , nor of great occurrences, nor of great fish, nor fights, nor contests of strength, nor of his wife. He only dreamed of places now and of the lions on the beach. They played like young cats in the dusk and he loved them as he loved the boy” (Hemingway 25). Hemingway’s goal was to demonstrate how much a person can receive from so little. He valued everything life had to offer, as did his character, Santiago. The

The writer/artist that I chose to enlighten you with has inspired many writers as well as literature majors for many years. He continues to tickle our imaginations with the legacy that he has left us with. This man was as genuine as you can get. He was loved by many. He made an impact on any life that he came across. This man is non other than, Ernest Hemingway.

The author appeals to senses and many emotions. He addresses the reader in a way that he is talking to them, as if they are the one in this varying place, experiencing all of these sensations. The writer describes “you crossed a bridge across a canal to enter this hospital,” “the chestnuts were warm afterward in your pocket,” “you entered through a grate and walked across,” Hemingway creates this sense of realism and actuality for the reader, causing them to feel like they are part of the story. He succeeds in doing so by tapping into the audience’s emotions. Describing “warmth in your pocket” This results in an emotional connection with the reader. This personal writing and appealing to emotions is a great example of Hemingway’s talented inclusion of pathos.

Ernest Hemingway is well known throughout American literature for his unique style of writing, which contributed greatly to the overall effect and meaning of his stories. Before writing short stories, Hemingway was a journalist, which is where he adopted many of his unique techniques of writing. While writing as a journalist, Hemingway tended to write pieces that contained brief, choppy sentences and were generally minimalistic and terse. More importantly, this is where Hemingway developed his skill for writing “on the surface”. Hemingway’s use of the iceberg effect, diction, and syntax were largely what made him successful due to the contributions these styles had on his stories.

Sometimes it is more important to realize how the characters speak to each other or even what they decide not to say than what they are actually saying. Sometimes Hemingway has his characters saying only things that the other characters want to hear, in this way Hemingway shows the complexity of the way humans actually interact. A great example of Hemingway’s writing styles are displayed in "A Clean Well-Lighted Place”, this shows that a plot that could seem so simple can turn out actually truly complex. During this story Hemingway lets the characters speak, from the characters we find out the loneliness inside the two men and the apathetic animosity of the other. Another prime example of Hemingway’s writing styles are found in his short story “Hills like White Elephants”, when the story starts we see two people, a man and a woman, sitting at a table talking, Hemingway does not give the reader any prior knowledge, only the characters dialogue.

He does this by transitioning from “It stopped at this junction for two minutes and went on to Madrid.” to “What should we drink?”(273, Hemingway). Another thing to be noticed is that the story uses complex language. The Spanish language and the imagery, makes you think of where they are instead of telling the reader up-front. Quotes such as “Dos Cervezas” make it apparent that the story isn’t all simple (273, Hemingway). Quotes like “They look like white elephants” make us wonder what she is referencing towards (274, Hemingway). In this story the dialogue also interprets emotions such as “And if I do it you’ll be happy and things will be like they were and you’ll love me?” (275,

One way Hemingway uses symbolism to explain how the man and woman have different thoughts about their relationship. For example, “ the station was between two lines of rails” , this may mean that their relationship is at a crossroad, because the rails have different destinations which in turn means that the man and women have a different idea for the future of their relationship. Another example is the quote, “they look like white elephants” the woman says this when referring to the hills. She is trying to tell the man that the baby she is expecting is like a “white elephant” because it is like an unwanted gift or something that's hard to dispose of. We have to keep in mind that during this time period in which this took place abortion was

To illustrate the idea, after the old man left the cafe, the narrator made a distinctive or yet unusual sentences. Here is what the narrator said, “Some lived in it and never felt it but he knew it all was nada y pues nada y nada y pues nada.” (Hemingway 4). From this example, you can see how the narrator casually talks to the readers in which shows how Hemingway wants to show. He also made where the narrator’s voice is lousy because of the same repetitive words. He also had shown some words in this example to make the narrator’s words be taken at the face value. These are the ways of telling on what Hemingway tries to tell us based from the way every characters

As one re-reads the story, it is evident that Hemingway has chosen this style for a particular reason.  Hemingway did not have Ole executed, because in doing so the reader would focus all the attention to his tragic death.  The murder does not occur, and the reader is forced to focus on the reaction of Nick, Sam and George, and the nonchalant attitude of "The Killers."  "One has to read it two or three times before he realizes that Nick Adams is the central figure" (Walcutt, 305).  The story can be broken into four scenes; first, "The Killers" are introduced; second, Nick warns Ole; third, Nick speaks to Mrs. Bell; fourth, Nick returns to the cafe.  Nick is the only character present in each scene, and in returning to the cafe his final statement to George is, "'I can't  stand to think about him waiting in the room and knowing he's going to get it.  It's too damned awful."'  George replies, "'You better not think about it'"(Hemingway, 252).  It is obvious Nick is unwilling to accept defeat, and give up his delusion of a world without evil.  To maintain his delusion, he is willing to escape the reality that is presented to him.  "So, of the two boys, it is obviously Nick on whom the impression has been made.  George has managed to come to terms with the situation.  By this line of reasoning, it is Nick's story" (Brooks, 195).  Nick is the only character that evolves; Nick is a round character.  The other