Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience: American Resistance

In Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, he is writing to the American people. He is trying to spark a desire for change, for people to oppose their government without actions. He uses this work to criticize the American institution of slavery as well as the Mexican-American War. Thoreau is attempting to convey the importance of listening to one’s conscience over the laws, believing that it is more important to do what they feel is right rather than listen to the laws given by the majority. Thoreau feels that people should protest against their government, but not using violent actions. He is trying to persuade the people to voice their opinions and break the chain of majority rule. Thoreau is writing during the time of the war between the United States and Mexico, which took place between 1846 and 1848. He writes to oppose the government’s actions and policies during this time period. He refused to pay a tax that would support the war and was imprisoned for a day. Thoreau uses ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade his audience to agree with his view of the American government and to voice their oppositions.

According Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, he mentions that to require civil disobedience, the circumstances must be like America’s. Circumstances like practicing war, deriving power from the people, having unjust laws, and supporting slavery. Thoreau writes, “must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislation?” (Thoreau ). He mentions how no man should be subdued to any government or institution, especially if it portrays unjust. Therefore he also implies that if a law exhibits unjust, the population should not follow the law with the knowledge of the consequence. Similarly, Thoreau establishes, “when . . . a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law, I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize,” (Thoreau ). He explains how it expresses the duty of Americans to rebel and use civil disobedience, it is not just a right, but it drives Americans to be aware of and completely use for the advantage of society. Thoreau further explains the unlawful government by stating, “I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which the slave's government also,” (Thoreau ). He describes the circumstance of America as a prejudiced institution, which rightfully allows citizens to use their duty of civil disobedience. A government should require unjust laws, slavery, aggressive law, and strength over intelligence to cause civil disobedience. However, civil disobedience a citizen’s duty and they must maintain it.

The Statue of Liberty is an American symbol of justice and freedom from oppression, yet in Henry Thoreau's opinion, the U.S. government is completely antithetical. In Thoreau’s essay on civil disobedience, he introduces and accepts the motto, “That government is best which governs not at all.” In his eyes, the government does more harm than good for its people. Underneath his seemingly main idea, Thoreau implies an overall antithesis where he defines who, in his eyes, is allowed to be disobedient. In order to advance this main idea and reinforce this mottos throughout the essay, Thoreau uses metaphors and juxtaposition to strengthen this subtle antithesis found throughout the essay.

Thoreau believed that individual integrity had the ability to triumph the government. Thoreau went to jail because he refused to pay his poll taxes for the past six years. Also, he protested against the Mexican war, and slavery, which also contributed to him going to jail and his views on the government. During his short period in jail he clarified that he did not dread it, and portrayed it as “Traveling into a far country” (964).

Thoreau's Civil Disobedience talks about politics, government and the issues concerning these areas today. "Government is best which governs least." This motto means that the government should not have complete power over the people. The people's opinion is what matters the most. Individualism is stressed throughout his writing. To stand up for what you believe in and not bend backwards for the government is necessary. He speaks of Slavery and the war in Mexico and how is must be put to a stop. The people are responsible for this happening. Many people opposed these things yet did nothing to change it. Allowing yourself to be a part of injustice makes you a part of the negativity. Paying taxes to a corrupt government makes you

One reason I think Thoreau writes an effective argument is because of his freedom of speech. Thoreau did not want to pay the Poll Tax, because he did not support the Mexican-American War. The Poll tax is a tax levied on every adult, without reference to income or resources. In 1842, Thoreau stopped paying the poll tax, it supported the expansion of slavery into the southwest. Mexican-American War was fought between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848. The Untied States won the war, encouraged by the feelings of many Americans that the country was accomplishing its manifest destiny of expansion. Civil Disobedience is the belief that people should not conform to society, but stay independent and embrace their own beliefs goals, values, and morals.

     Any one can say that a law is unfair and unjust. However, who is really willing to accept the consequences for going against an unjust law? Is breaking this law really worth the punishment? The government is the one to decide whether a law is reasonable, but what if a member of the public believes that a law is not? Should he rebel against this law? Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. answered yes to this question and believed that one should speak out against an injustice. They both believed that government had many flaws. Even though they shared many beliefs in many of the same subjects concerning Civil Disobedience, they had many different

In “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau claims that men should act from their conscience. Thoreau believed it was the duty of a person to disobey the law if his conscience says that the law is unjust. He

Both, Thoreau and King, in their works “Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” successfully and effectively delineates arguments for the importance and necessity of civil disobedience. Although both essays present very similar ideas, it is important to note the similarities and differences which are evident through the use of language and the presentation of the arguments and ideas because if it were not for the proper use of language, tone, and presentation of the idea of civil disobedience in Dr. King’s letter, he might not have been successful in his campaign; Thoreau initially presented the idea of civil disobedience in 1848, but his contemporaries dismissed his political essays.

Have you ever felt a rule you had to follow was unjust? Have you ever felt your moral instinct tell you not to follow it? Prominent figures in American history, Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, felt this way and decided to not follow the rules imposed on them by indulging in “civil disobedience”. Civil disobedience is the act of peacefully disobeying laws or customs with the purpose of combating moral injustice. This form of protest has proven to be quite effective in making change in history. In “Civil Disobedience” and the “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, both Thoreau and King Jr. write their justification for their actions as well as their feelings regarding the particular disputed

Thoreau’s model of living (expressed in “Resistance to Civil Government”) relates his notion of what an individual’s role is in the government by his belief in a higher “moral law” (a man’s conscience) that the people should adhere to rather than the laws dictated by the United States Constitution. Thoreau demonstrates this ideology of man self-governing by his own conscience when he asks if a man must “… [R]esign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think we should be men first, and subjects afterward … The only obligation which I have a right to assume, is to do at any time what I think right” (965). Furthermore, he asserts that the government is corrupt because it is run by majorities and “… [A] government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice” (965), and “If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine government … [T]hen I say break the law” (970). Thus, he stresses the importance for

Thoreau's Civil Disobedience embraces the need to organize one's still, small voice over the directs of laws. It scrutinizes American social foundations and approaches, most noticeably bondage and the Mexican-American War. Legislature once in awhile substantiates itself valuable and that it gets its energy from the greater part since they are the most grounded gathering, not on the grounds that they hold the most realistic perspective. He fights that individuals' first commitment is to do what they accept is correct and not to take the law managed by the larger part. At the point when an administration is out of line, individuals should decline to take the law and separation themselves from the legislature by and large. A man isn't committed to giving his life to taking out indecencies from the world, yet he is committed not to partake in such shades of malice. This incorporates not being an individual from a treacherous foundation (like the legislature). Thoreau additionally contends that the United States fits his criteria for an out of line government, given its help of servitude and its routine with regards to forceful war.

Describe Thoreau’s idea of civil disobedience in your own words. To what extent do you agree or disagree with his philosophy? Would you consider yourself to be civilly disobedient and to what degree?

Thoreau’s personal experiences help give a sense of realisticness to what he’s writing within his essay. The idea of resisting the government, being above whichever laws, seems irrational and bogus before taking the time to read this essay and while obviously there’s still plenty of reason to confine to the government's wishes, his essay offers a outside input to the reasons in why you shouldn’t- not because he feels as if he’s immune to law, or above authority- but because he feels as current politicans and laws aren’t as honorable as they are made out to be. With his personal experience he expresses that even through his time in jail, the law only confined his body and mind and alongside that with his wanting to conform to societal views