Examples Of Hierarchical Teams

Within any successful team, you will find leaders, it need not be the manager, and it doesn’t have to be the same person all the time, you only have to look at any successful sports team to see that there are numerous leaders and within the team each person knows the role they have to perform at any set moment and can change as the situation needs. This has been well explained in the Belbin Team Architecture.

There are many different approaches to creating a cohesive team and different management styles can be applied to get good results. No matter how a manager approaches their team they all must be able to implement the following.

As mentioned above the unequal division of responsibility within department due to lack of job design also results in a bad coordination within the organization. Examples of instance referred to in the case of Duplox would be the interdependence between the TSS and FSM teams; the sales department and the TSS’s, where the sales team don’t put much weight on the argument by the TSS’s that improper installation can cause higher repair and service cost. This not only creates discontentment between department but also affects the bonuses the Directors and managers gain based on the TSS’s productivity which is either met or exceed the past year. High- involvement managerial strategy the supervisor no longer would be the primary controller and evaluator instead would be the facilitator. They would help remove barriers to adequate performance and provide resources and assistance to subordinates to perform efficiently and allow decisions to be made at the lowest possible levels in the organization. The overall leadership style is participative or democratic in nature.

Organization is based on several levels with each different authority. Information flows gradually from the bottom to the top level, as well as tiered command line from top to bottom. Hierarchical system as it was made into a rigid bureaucracy and made the decision-making process becomes fragmented because of the flow of information and commands only run vertically. For example, the organizational structure of the Ministry of Internal Transport of Sri Langka at least has seven levels of bureaucracy, from bottom to higher levels start from additional deputy director, deputy director, director, additional secretary, secretary, deputy minister, and minister. Such hierarchy is likely to cause substantial distortion, in terms of information delivery from the bottom to the top and in terms of translating messages or orders from

Agreement and consensus is largely formed among the team, who respond well to facilitation by leader. Roles and responsibilities are clear and accepted. Big decisions are made by group agreement. Smaller decisions may be delegated to individuals or small teams within group. Commitment and unity is strong. The team may engage in fun and social activities. The team discusses and develops its processes and working style. There is general respect for the leader and some of leadership is more shared by the team. The leader facilitates and enables.

There is no hierarchy, and everyone is treated as equal. There are also no titles for staff or permanent assignment to them. In turn, this helps to boost the morale of the staffs, since they are all considered a valued asset to the company. It also helps to enhance teamwork, as there is no competition among staffs to get a promotion. Furthermore, their group leader is elected not because of seniority but because of his ability to work well in groups. With a skilled leader, it will serve to improve both the efficiency and effectiveness of the company. The company also believes in hiring people who do not listen to the boss, but instead takes risk. Such a fair and equal culture is a key component to

Top-level managers are responsible for controlling and evaluating the entire organization. Middle-level managers are responsible for implementing the organizational plans which set by the top management officals. The middle managers act as a link between top-level management and low-level management. Low-level managers focus on controlling and directing. They supervise the employees on their work. Top-level managers include the board of directors, president, vice-president, and CEO. They are responsible for setting goals, strategic plans, company policies, and make decisions for the entire organisation. In addition, top-level managers play an important role in utilizing the outside resources. Top-level managers are accountable to the shareholders and general public. Middle level management includes General managers, branch managers, and department managers. They are accountable to the top management for the effective function of each

Ivancevich, Konopaske and Matteson (2008) mirror these views by holding on to the concept that the use of team work in the organization forcefully follows the structured schema of identifying true leaders within the organizational structure, facilitating the emotional commitment of such leaders and evaluating the progress of the teams by using a mix of people from different levels and departments in the organization. The efficiency of the coalition leads to improved performance for both short term and long-term goals.

All with differing skills and levels of experience, to allow a service to be provided efficiently and effectively. Each member of the team has a purpose and a function within that team, so the overall success depends on a functional interdependency. There is usually not as much room for conflict when working as a team. The team also does not rely on groupthink to arrive at its conclusions.

In today's society some corporations have achieved success by replacing the hierarchical boss-subordinate relationship with that of an empowered work team. Many corporations know the value of a high-performance team. A high-performance team has a great deal to offer to the organization. In a team environment, people are not managed, controlled or supervised. They are led by their mutual vision of the organization's purpose and goals. Teams surpass individuals working alone, especially when performance requires several abilities, verdict, and active involvement...

Many organizations today believe that the use of work teams will allow them to produce better products and provide better services, faster, and at lower costs. Using a work team approach can reinvigorate productivity and service provider motivation, and better position an organization to deal with a rapidly changing environment. However establishing effective work teams is not something that comes easy. Though, the benefits of effective work teams within an organization are very substantial, it takes alot of hard work and dedication on the part of management and team members to develop, implement and maintain effective work teams.

There was a coordination and collaboration among all departments in the organization that resulted in faster accomplishment of tasks. Also, the goals of the organization were clear for the employees and they were always stressed by their managers.

Effective organizational structures define how job tasks are subdivided, grouped, coordinated, and managed. Six key components of organizational structures include division of labor, departmentalization, chain of command, span of control, centralization, and formalization (Remme, Jones, Van der Heijden, & De Bono, 2008, p. 79). Each element influence how employees interact with each other to reach organizational goals. Different structures are common in similar organizations among high performing organizations (Reimann, 1974, p. 707). The most appropriate structure will depend on the unique needs and culture of the organization.

Structure and hierarchy come from how work and the work processes are coordinated together and relating how tasks and coordination of these tasks is to be obtained. When determining the authority in the structure of an organization, there are two major options, centralized and decentralized. A centralized organizational setup is where the authority to make important decisions is retained by managers at the top of the created hierarchy whereas a decentralized organizational setup is where the authority to make important decisions about organizational resources and to initiate new projects is delegated to managers at all levels in the hierarchy. Each choice is made based upon the main goal/task of the organization and what would better fit the organization. Whether work/the

Departments in businesses all partake in important roles, departments such as human resources, accounting and finance, production amongst others remain vital to the company so it can work progressively. However, there are key departments which are desired more than others.