GAO called again to Ms Haines. She stated that her last name has changed to Haines form Higgs. She stated that already has provided her new ID and SS card to the Estacada APD Office, but still remains unchanged. She was complaining about her QMB medical has not been back dated to March, when she applied. She stated that in March, she was asked for an award letter from the SSA, which she provided it. At that time, she was informed that the process will take around 90 days. In June, she called to follow-up and was informed still was not processed. Then in June she was informed that the APD office does not have records of her award letter because the worker that was processing her application does no longer works in that office. She provided it.
Regulations found at 55 Pa. Code § 275.5 stated that the issue “is not whether the CAO or administering agency acted properly based upon the information then available, but whether the appellant was eligible for the period of time at issue based upon evidence of eligibility the client is able to provide at or before the hearing”. The Department’s Representative’s testimony was that the new determination based on the new information was still pending with another Department worker and that the issue of the appeal was related to category MG-91, specifically. The ALJ finds that prior to the administrative hearing the Department was in receipt of information that could have altered the Appellant’s eligibility for MA. Prior to the administrative hearing, the Appellant should have been reviewed for eligibility under the MAWD program as requested on her appeal and issued a new eligibility determination, but the Department failed to do
She asked to review her application for February then, since Jeffrey is no longer receiving UC and he does not expect to increase his income because the inclement weather. I asked her if she already has spoken with her worker. She said that she has called twice, but nobody is returning her calls. I told her I will send and email to the branch lead worker asking to have someone to call her back to discuss her application for February. I gave her my information and phone
On September 21, 2012, ACEDS Case Action Update/Display documented by Social Service Representative, Richard Gordon stated that Ms. Williams arrived to the agency to apply for Supplmental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, and Medicaid for her child only. During the visit, CARE interface revealed that Ms. Williams had an open Medicaid case in Maryland (#47403882500). Maryland Social Services also reported that she was employed by CPR Medical as of August 9, 2012, and paid bi-weekly $850.00. Ms. Williams also reportedly received unearned monthly income from SSI in September 2012 in the amount of $440.34, and in October 2012, in the amount of $370.54. As a result, Ms. Williams was denied expedited Foodstamps pending paystubs and her application was marked as "pending."
After holding furthermore, she explains that the disbursement TL, however, she is able to offer a follow up the cover person to address the issue. She shows understanding
In this case, the Department’s Representative testified to mailing the Appellant a manual notice on June 3, 2016 advising that the household’s application for cash assistance was being denied due to failure to meet residency requirements. On August 9, 2016, The Appellant called the Department to make an oral appeal. The Appellant’s appeal was filed August 10, 2016, sixty-eight (68) days after the denial. Since the appeal was
I informed Julie that the GAO does not have jurisdiction to intervene or interfere in the certification process or its outcome, however we can check if the process and the outcome is in compliance with DHS policy. I.asked her if she would like us to contact the certifier to ask about the status of her application. She said no, she would rather to wait for the outcome.
Medical: Ms. Williams failed to submit her medical documentation. Ms. Williams is expected to submit her medical evaluation or physical by 03/2017. Case Manager explained to Ms. Williams that if she failed to submit the documents required she would be considered as non-compliance.
She stated she moved out of her mother’s home to Northport, Alabama with her oldest child Antonio being placed in elementary school. She stated that in 1987 or 1988, she moved to Canton, Ohio, where she applied for Aid to Dependent Child (ADC); she was informed that someone was already receiving ADC for the children. She stated that she received notification from DHR in Tuscaloosa stating that they did not keep records back that far; the only records they have shown that she received Medicaid at the time. Ms. Lawson stated that during that time, her mother deceived DHR, the juvenile court, etc. and they are still being deceived to this day. Ms. Lawson stated she has always taken care of her children, has never given up custody of her children, been on the system very little; and has always maintained a job. Ms. Lawson stated that other than this issue, she wanted it known that there are other cases regarding her mother having to do with fraud and manipulation of the courts, DHR, and her children; court cases
I, Jasmine Sanchez, has received a denial letter of September 15, 2017 and hereby wish to appeal my status from the Office of Navajo Nation Scholarship and Financial Assistance. The reason of my denied status is incomplete or lack of official high school transcript with cumulative grade point average, ACT/SAT score, 8th term, date of graduation, and letter of admission. However, according to my ONNSFA account, the documents received by the Office of Navajo Nation Scholarship and Financial Assistance is the application of April 19, 2017. My Certificate of Indian Blood received on May 2, 2017 and Financial Need Analysis of June 26, 2017.
She stated, is having a hard time to participate in the JOBS Program because she was taking care of her grandmother who is expected to pass away some time during this week. She stated that has been taking her of her grandmother since August. By looking in TRACS, it looks that she called your office on 08/26/16 and 08/29/16 requesting a call back. As of today, no records found that someone at 1401 called her back.
On March __, 2017, in response to several complaints from employees regarding her failure to properly process,
The GAO received a call from Mr HAINES, ERIN (Phone: 415-531 0199; case F 87077285) reporting that the Branch 2803 Fax number is not working. He wants to fax a “change report” even though I informed him (and also Sophanna lao as well told him – TRACS # 40) that he needs to fax is a 852. His SNAP benefits are in SU
I asked what is the reason behind this nobody up there seems to know or they know and are not telling.
I am appealing for denial of my STD claim due to the following reasons. I submitted the claim on 07/22/2016. I was informed that within a couple of days my claim is going to be assigned to the claim manager, and the claim manager will discuss the following steps I need to take. A few days after I was contacted by Monique informing me that my treating physician will need to fax supporting information by 08/04/2016. I believe on 08/01/16 Monique reached out to me again stating that she has not yet received my information from my physician yet. According to my physician, the required information was faxed on 08/03/2016 and 08/04/2016. After these dates, I have not heard from Monique or my client manager Cheriane Zephy in regards to the progress or the approval/denial of my STD Claim. I reached out to Aetna numerous times trying to get in touch with my client manager. At every attempt, I was told by the customer service representative that my client manager either is away from her desk, cannot take my call, or out of the office for the day. Additionally, I was informed that according to their log, my client manager called me on 08/08/2016 and 08/09/2016, which is
The Higgs boson or God Particle was theorised 50 years ago by two physicists Francois Elgert and Peter Higgs. They were awarded with a Nobel Prize for confirming its existence on July 4th, 2012. It is possible further research will lead to major discoveries in the future of physics . The Higgs boson is known as the key to understanding why mass exists and how it was originally constructed. It should be further examined and studied.