Higgs: Case Study

1.Define truthfulness, according to Higgs, and explain how a truthful doctor would convey complicated, technical information to a patient without medical training and significant anxiety about his or her condition?

Regulations found at 55 Pa. Code § 275.5 stated that the issue “is not whether the CAO or administering agency acted properly based upon the information then available, but whether the appellant was eligible for the period of time at issue based upon evidence of eligibility the client is able to provide at or before the hearing”. The Department’s Representative’s testimony was that the new determination based on the new information was still pending with another Department worker and that the issue of the appeal was related to category MG-91, specifically. The ALJ finds that prior to the administrative hearing the Department was in receipt of information that could have altered the Appellant’s eligibility for MA. Prior to the administrative hearing, the Appellant should have been reviewed for eligibility under the MAWD program as requested on her appeal and issued a new eligibility determination, but the Department failed to do

Medical: Ms. Williams failed to submit her medical documentation. Ms. Williams is expected to submit her medical evaluation or physical by 03/2017. Case Manager explained to Ms. Williams that if she failed to submit the documents required she would be considered as non-compliance.

She asked me how long can take the review process, she was informed about 90 days, but it could be extended.

On September 21, 2012, ACEDS Case Action Update/Display documented by Social Service Representative, Richard Gordon stated that Ms. Williams arrived to the agency to apply for Supplmental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, and Medicaid for her child only. During the visit, CARE interface revealed that Ms. Williams had an open Medicaid case in Maryland (#47403882500). Maryland Social Services also reported that she was employed by CPR Medical as of August 9, 2012, and paid bi-weekly $850.00. Ms. Williams also reportedly received unearned monthly income from SSI in September 2012 in the amount of $440.34, and in October 2012, in the amount of $370.54. As a result, Ms. Williams was denied expedited Foodstamps pending paystubs and her application was marked as "pending."

She asked to review her application for February then, since Jeffrey is no longer receiving UC and he does not expect to increase his income because the inclement weather. I asked her if she already has spoken with her worker. She said that she has called twice, but nobody is returning her calls. I told her I will send and email to the branch lead worker asking to have someone to call her back to discuss her application for February. I gave her my information and phone

In this case, the Department’s Representative testified to mailing the Appellant a manual notice on June 3, 2016 advising that the household’s application for cash assistance was being denied due to failure to meet residency requirements. On August 9, 2016, The Appellant called the Department to make an oral appeal. The Appellant’s appeal was filed August 10, 2016, sixty-eight (68) days after the denial. Since the appeal was

After holding furthermore, she explains that the disbursement TL, however, she is able to offer a follow up the cover person to address the issue. She shows understanding

good. "The denial letter, the only thing it really stated was that there were no records found and

She stated she moved out of her mother’s home to Northport, Alabama with her oldest child Antonio being placed in elementary school. She stated that in 1987 or 1988, she moved to Canton, Ohio, where she applied for Aid to Dependent Child (ADC); she was informed that someone was already receiving ADC for the children. She stated that she received notification from DHR in Tuscaloosa stating that they did not keep records back that far; the only records they have shown that she received Medicaid at the time. Ms. Lawson stated that during that time, her mother deceived DHR, the juvenile court, etc. and they are still being deceived to this day. Ms. Lawson stated she has always taken care of her children, has never given up custody of her children, been on the system very little; and has always maintained a job. Ms. Lawson stated that other than this issue, she wanted it known that there are other cases regarding her mother having to do with fraud and manipulation of the courts, DHR, and her children; court cases

September 8, 2015 and sent a request for recoupment to Advocate Health and Hospital on

The GAO made a phone call to constituent Adele Page. She stated has been trying to contact her case manager at SSP, SE Powell Branch (1401) for over a week and did not receive a phone call back.

The GAO received a call from Mr HAINES, ERIN (Phone: 415-531 0199; case F 87077285) reporting that the Branch 2803 Fax number is not working. He wants to fax a “change report” even though I informed him (and also Sophanna lao as well told him – TRACS # 40) that he needs to fax is a 852. His SNAP benefits are in SU

I asked what is the reason behind this nobody up there seems to know or they know and are not telling.

The Higgs boson or God Particle was theorised 50 years ago by two physicists Francois Elgert and Peter Higgs. They were awarded with a Nobel Prize for confirming its existence on July 4th, 2012. It is possible further research will lead to major discoveries in the future of physics . The Higgs boson is known as the key to understanding why mass exists and how it was originally constructed. It should be further examined and studied.