High Fine Arts Programs Should Be Funded

Good Essays
Since the nation issued financial cuts, Fine Arts programs have been reduced or completely abolished. This reduction instigates the controversy on how to deal with prioritizing funding from the federal government. Students, parents, teachers, taxpayers, schools, and the federal government are all directly involved in this controversy. People that value arts education tend to be more anxious about the possible outcomes. The stakeholders are divided on whether or not the fine arts should be funded in schools. Stakeholders worried about their non-fine arts programs want the funding priority to be in their favor. However, people associated with fine arts want to see funding in their programs. Pro-Fine arts education stakeholders mostly point to the values of the outcomes that derive from the arts as their prime support for their argument. This controversy comes to an agreement of schools needing to be funded equally and efficiently. In “The Stealth Inequities of School Funding”, Rutgers university professor, Bruce Baker, analyzed the comparison of goals of state aid formulas and their outcomes. Although state aid formulas are constructed to endorse fairness and capability, they are producing the inequality and incompetence. Baker discovered this by examining how states distribute the funding they are given. States are giving the funding they receive to low-poverty stricken schools. With additional study, he finds that the balance of funding would be equalized if the money
Get Access