Higher Education as an Organization Essay

Corporatization of colleges makes earning money the Administrator's main priority, not educating students. In the article “Foundations of Corporatization: Lessons from the Community College” by Juli A. Jones, she argues how corporatization of schools has many negative effects on the students, including the quality of the education they receive, and the raise tuition prices. “The funding crisis that fuels corporatization is particularly acute at the community college level; our funding is significantly below national levels, below our state university system levels, and below our K-12 rates” (Jones 1). What she means is many colleges, especially community colleges, lack the funding they need, and the colleges really have no choice but to turn to corporatization to stay afloat. The problem is that the focus of the college becomes making money and turning a profit; The quality of education students receives goes down, while the price of tuition goes

Colleges and university have slowly become one of the stepping stones into the working world today. People go to colleges for higher education with the intention of earning degrees in which they can use in their respective fields. Some example degrees that people pursue are Medical, Law, Business, Accounting, and Science Degrees. Through the years the idea of college was that it was optional and it was a door for better life and job. However in the modern times, it become a necessity. It all started when the colleges once single- gender institutions target specific students in their respective demographics. Today, the college market has now been divided into two major categories:

America’s education system has been in a state of distress for the past decade, but garnished headlines recently as the student loan debt crisis reached over a trillion dollars. In conjunction with that, tuition is no longer the only obstacle a student faces when considering their future. As generations come and go, universities have slowly, but surely, been angling their education in a way to favor profit over knowledge. Because of the new direction higher education models are taking, Magdalena Kay questions her readers, “is there a problem with students, with teachers, with administrators, or maybe

At the end of the day, colleges and universities are a platform for students to learn and excel. At the same time they are there for businesses to become success stories. Campuses are surrounded by businesses, which is great for the economy. Economic growth is significant for businesses around college and university campuses, as well as for the school itself.

The for-profit college and university (FPCU) is an institutional type that “’do[es]’ education or schooling but also ‘behave[s]’ like a business, while preparing students for occupational roles (Hentschke, Lechuga & Tierney, 2010, p. 2). This paper will discuss history; cite changes in curriculum, degree offerings, and institution classification; and explore current issues of financial viability, accreditation, and fraudulent practices of the for-profit college.

In Simon Young’s essay “Universities, Governments and Industry: Can the Essential Nature of Universities Survive the Drive to Commercialize?” Young implies many universities increase their focus on commercializing rather than focusing to increase a higher branch of learning for university students. Throughout the essay Young voices his concern for this issue through the use of statistics, concrete facts, research and by acknowledging the issue Young is able to inform his readers about the increase rate of commercialization from universities which he believes is a universities purpose. Young notes 40 years of his life were spent at Universities and this allows the gain of credibility. Young’s audience are members of psychiatry and

Now all types of institutions - public and private, two year and four year, non-profit and for-profit-are vying for the same pool of students, public funding, research grants, and prestige. In the process they are creating a fierce competition that is slowly chipping away at higher education’s commitment to servicing public needs. (Couturier, 2005, p. 87)

I am sympathetic to the instinct to ignore the question of whether a college is accountable to owners (for-profit), or, alternatively, is answerable to a financially disinterested board (nonprofit or public). While there is a higher incidence of problematic behavior at for-profit colleges, there are also nonprofit and public institutions that don’t do right by students and the public interest.

Researchers of for-profit post-secondary institutions have realized that for-profit post-secondary institutions are fast growing players in the post-secondary education sector. Most researchers in the education industry come from the non-profit sector and often criticize for-profit institutions as wrong doers. Researchers hold that for-profit institutions sell degrees, misrepresent and deceive their students leading to defaulted student loans and an on-going defrauding of the federal government. Research demonstrates that the Federal government has responded to the criticism of their lack of oversight of post-secondary for-profit institutions with numerous regulations, some apply only to for-profit institutions. These regulations control everything from, the programs offered, the way admissions recruiters are compensated, limitations on default rates and limitations on the revenue a for-profit institution can derive from federal funds. However, the research around for-profit educations does not address the adequacy of the regulations in serving their underlying purpose or to address the impact, if any, on for-profit institutions.

Given higher education’s current process of reinvention and the history of mergers as part of American higher education in particular, it is unsurprising that mergers continue to be seen as a way to solve many of the cost issues facing colleges and universities today. It is also unsurprising that mergers are growing more complex given the modern university environment’s assorted real and intellectual property, related enterprises, and physical assets. Indeed, many colleges, while not averse to the idea, are cautious. A final contrasting point which makes the Skodvin, (1999) research more suspect and less creditable is that laws have changed in recent years which has expanded the reasons why educational institutions are looking harder at mergers and consolidations. The rational may have been relevant for a particular segment of educational institutions at a particular time but certainly not

The tuition increases have come in response to the lack of federal funding to universities, leading them to find their own way to provide for their upkeep. “Recent increases in university tuition fees are part of a new entrepreneurial trend in higher education in which institutions are expected to generate more of their own revenue” (Quirke). The universities have decided that since they can no longer look towards federal funds to fuel their costs of maintenance and revenue, they must find a new route towards attaining much needed funds, and they have chosen to

The term university originally meant a corporation of guild. All universities were corporations of students or teachers. Guilds were originally established to protect the interests and rights of the members. The majority of the universities practiced diverse curriculum ( a few universities did specialize in medicine or law). A new

U.S. schools and colleges vary from numerous points of view. Some are open, others are independently employed individual; some are huge urban colleges, some are two-yr. group universities, others little rustic grounds. Some offer alumna and expert political stage, others point of convergence basically on undergrad instruction. Each of our more than 3, 000 schools and colleges has its particular and dissimilar mission. This aggregate differing qualities around organizations is one of the extraordinary strength of America's higher instruction framework, and has helped make it the best in the people. Protecting that assorted qualities is key on the off chance that we plan to serve the needs of our just social order.

Twenty-one million students are anticipated to attend some sort of higher education (Barrow et al.). And tuition costs are reaching all-time highs; about high as the salary an average American makes in a year (Kay 36). This is a drastic change in the higher education system in America. Colleges used to be mainly religious institutions hundreds of years ago and were based on moral training and proper conduct. Overall, making better people for society. In the present day, American colleges are helping aid students in getting jobs while building up the student’s values. Many have pondered over if the value of higher education that is taught is worth the price being paid. Some have said that the costs are too high for anyone besides the upper class, but people are still enrolling with increased rates each year. Higher education is worth the price because it provides lifelong benefits to the people who graduate with a degree. People who obtain a degree attain life skills that everyone should learn, get paid more money in their lifetime, and gain a quality education.

In order to gain control over the allocation of resources throughout the university and also to balance the monies being distributed amongst the revenue centres a system of participation/subvention was used by the university administrators. These participations were mere equal contributions (20% of the total tuition fees, sales and service income, and indirect cost recoveries) from all revenue centres and were redistributed back to them as block grants called subventions and these participations were portrayed as negative and subventions as positive indirect income. These features in fact enabled university administrators to focus on university priorities and goals. In allocating subventions their main focus was firstly on differentials in the costs of educating students in different fields and secondly, the revenue centres’ cost/quality ratios.