Hillary Clinton Debate Summary

The title is At Republican Debate, Candidates Are Likely to Set Sights on Ted Cruz, written by Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman issued on December 14, 2015. Many controversial topics have defined the previous Republican debates with Donald Trump currently leading in the polls. This article characterizes possible tactics for the final Republican debate. The subject matter of this article deals with potential Republican presidential candidates. Candidates must attack Donald Trump if they want a chance of taking him over in the polls. Some facts are based on state reporting and opinions on debate tactics. The editor does attempt to appeal to his readers' emotions by highlighting voter's concerns and issues including terrorism,

Barbara Bush gave a speech unlike any other, a speech to an audience that had gone as far as to protest her even coming to speak to the point where her husband the President of the United States had to stand up for her (Eidenmuller). A speech that combined the use of Aristotle's Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in such a manner that each aspect grew the next. As one aspect developed in her speech it boosted the other up as well, allowing her to come from behind and present the True American Dream - the individual's personal dream. To an audience that despite her individual accomplishments looked down on her because of her Title First Lady.

In an article by Richard Eskow, “Sanders vs. Clinton: Who Has the Best Plan for America’s College students?” for the most part is committed to compare the variations of the two plans. Eskow starts off by mentioning some facts about society. He then goes into the general purposes of both plans for college finances. Eskow discusses Clinton’s plan and also mentions the ideas of what other Republican candidates plans to do. Lastly, he explains Sanders’ plan and also reflects on the nation. Eskow is comparing the two different plans to explain and show us the differences these two candidates are from one another. In doing so, Eskow has successfully applied all three types of rhetorical appeals, logos, pathos, and ethos, to effectively urge eligible

Throughout the first week of THE 225, many events took place within America that took the country by surprise. Trump’s inauguration was last Friday, January 20th, and already he has made drastic changes that will affect the lives of millions. His policies are based off sexist and racist claims that people have, for some odd reason, supported. With his new, corrupt policies, life in America will soon be set back decades because of his white supremacy mentality. Because of this, the nation has never been so divided since the Civil Rights Movement, something that was seemingly done with but clearly not if white supremacy becomes an issue. Although Trump’s America is not an ideal America and his claim to “Make American Great Again” implies

If President Donald Trump’s actions and intents represent the opposite of economic logic, then what would lead 62,979,879 people to vote for him. Trump’s plan for winning has many parts, but for starters, he largely focused on reviving the lower and middle class’ hopes, spirits, and incomes. The first part of this plan regards the specific language that he utilizes when speaking to the non-wealthy Americans. He is notable for repeating statements such as, “America doesn’t have victories anymore” or “they’re laughing at us”. By utilizing statements such as these, Trump is appealing to his audience’s emotions and implementing scare tactics that will place the listener in a frightened state. He then paints himself as the answer to the fears that

Working class Americans once experienced many benefits, but over the past few decades these have mostly evaporated, and the remaining benefits are disappearing at a rapid pace. Many individuals are often persuaded with false information and misdirection from charismatic figures without any thought to investigate any of the details for themselves. However, this is just a marvelous performance, confusing the issues of why the middle class and poor are suffering so severely in today’s economy. In reality, the primary cause is due to the economic elite, the wealthiest of Americans, who have strategically placed themselves as the ruling class (Barlett & Steele, 2012). They have proceeded to erect discriminatory borders in order to separate themselves from the others they discard.

In the first presidential debate Donald trump and Hillary Clinton made good points on what would happen if either one of them were president. In one of the arguments they were having hillary claims that she knows “how to really work to get new jobs and create new jobs”. Trump replies  “But you haven’t done it in 30 years”. Making a point that if she gets into office she is not going to do anything with her presidential. They were many arguments about different topics but the increasing tension of racism on this country captured me into it. Donald Trump addresses that “African Americans, Hispanics, are living in hell”, and hillary clinton shoots back at trump saying that “It’s unfortunate that he paints such a dire picture of black communities”.

After the worst collapse and weakest recovery, many Americans seem eager to listen to the Sanders critique of wealth distribution or Trump’s argument against trade. Families are skeptical of claims that the recession is over or that the US has recovered. They feel that they haven’t recovered are or worse off than they were before. According to Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum and a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, it’s an inconsistency between what is actually happening in their everyday lives and what they’re hearing which is why people are so angry. Trump and Sanders are using that anger to challenge the management of America’s economy at a more fundamental level than other candidates.

The first presidential debate was held in Hempstead, New York on Monday of September 26. The two presidential candidates that clashed that night was Republican nominee Donald J. Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. This night was meant to gain an advantage on your opponent in the polls. The debate focused on three main points of discussion; America’s Direction, Achieving Prosperity, and Securing America.

This election, many people see a solution to this problem through Donald Trump’s political campaign on a platform of “Make America Great Again”. Trump is running, creating new jobs and improving the economy, which appeals to many people who are in the lower and middle classes who have been left behind by economic inequality. Trump’s largest base of support comes from white Americans who do not have a high school degree. This group usually has a very small income, if any at all, because they are less educated. In contrast, those with a college degree have a much easier experience finding work out of college. This means that those without a high school diploma are looking for economic change in order to gain an advantage and proceed with their economic pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness. Other groups with large support for Trump are people with mobile homes and “old economy jobs” which are, similarly, groups with lower incomes. Trump appeals to these groups such as the “old economy jobs” because they are losing their jobs as new technology emerges. As “old economy jobs” decline, the demand for new jobs increase; the creation of which Donald Trump endorses. Donald Trump is definitely not a traditional conservative, but he has the ability to attract these groups with his platform through his populist appeal. Thus, a person who is lower in the economic gap would lean towards a candidate such as

In the “land of opportunity,” most white Americans feel that they have been cheated out of any chance to get ahead; to live the American dream. Having little or no job security or health insurance; pensions being taken away after working hard their entire lives; companies moving overseas; “a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many” (Obama, 2008, para. 36), these are valid reasons as to why whites feel anger and resentment. Also, some whites resent the fact that people of color are taking all of the good jobs or being accepted to the best colleges because of the color of their skin, or whites are being called prejudiced because of their fears of crime in their neighborhoods. Unlike black Americans, though, the white’s feelings of anger and resentment are not counterproductive. They have legitimate concerns and reasons as to why they feel the way they do, and no matter how hard they try to fight the “big boys” (aka the Government and corporations), or their prejudices, it is a losing battle and widens the racial divide in America. Obama, in his speech, also spoke about America’s racial history and the complexities of

This first presidential debate was chaos! The two candidates were just screaming over one another, and I couldn’t hear myself think! The night started out normal, or as normal as a debate is supposed to be. The two candidates seemed composed for a small period of time while acting like actual adults running for president. Unfortunately, when the first question about the economy was asked, Former Secretary Clinton decided to take a jab at Mr. Trump using a quote he had said about a potential real estate market crash in 2006. She quoted that Mr. Trump hoped for the market to crash so he could potentially buy it. To respond, Mr. Trump interrupted her and countered, "That's called business, by the way." This remark

Based on a transcript of a speech provided by Time, in June of this year presidential candidate Hillary Clinton gave a speech in San Diego, California in which several logical fallacies are committed. A logical fallacy is an attempt to persuade someone to a certain viewpoint by using unethical means. The use of fallacies against their opponents is not limited to current political candidates nor is it limited to one political party. Instead logical fallacies are a common tactic used by many past and present politicians in and attempt to defeat their opponents.

The 2016 election left many echoing the same words. What happen? Why was Donald Trump so appealing despite his appalling sexism and racism? Why did Americans embrace a noticeably incompetent candidate whose main campaign was propelled not by ethical procedures, but by provocations and insults? As we have judiciously deliberate in class, multiple factors impacted the unforeseeable outcome of the election. While some authors like Jeff Guo and Chris Arnade argued it was economic dissatisfaction that steered Mr. Trump to victory. Conversely, others such as Thomas Frank and Amanda Taub instead racial tensions and year for white privilege be the main contributors to the rise of Trump. The result of the election has been told through a number of different

It was a cool autumn day as the sun set on the horizon of Las Vegas, Nevada. That night the Democratic National Committee and CNN would host the first of a series of Democratic debates in the race for 2016 Presidential Race. Congress being out of session for the next few days, Senator Jay Whitman had just arrived at the airport and planned on heading straight to the debate to see what the future of the Democratic Party would bring to America. Being already, obviously, thoroughly versed in politics himself he was exhilarated to heard the candidates debate the issues that mattered to him and the people of Nevada her represented. Once he had arrived at the event, he found his way though security and into the auditorium. The debate started roughly