Hillary Clinton Pros And Cons Essay

Even after the passing of the Fifteenth Amendment, African Americans were “disenfranchised in the South by intimidation and electoral trickery, including whites-only primaries, rigged literacy tests, and poll taxes” (Patterson 2011, p. 180). The Freedom Riders rode through the South, enduring harassment and imprisonment to encourage other African Americans to vote. Voter turnout in African American communities is greatly encouraged. Personally, coming from an African American family, I was strongly encouraged by my parents and grandparents to vote when I was of legal age. My family instilled the importance of voting in me at a very young age. Although voter turnout among African Americans is still fairly low, in the 2008 presidential election African Americans had the second highest voter turnout, behind non-Hispanic Caucasians (African Americans, n.d.). Race can influence voter turnout because with African Americans specifically, although rates are getting better, they are still not high.

6.  True or False: The 2012 general election outcome was clearly decided in favor of president Mitt Romney. He became our first Mormon chief executive.

Yet it is a swing state. The record shows despite the victory of President Obama in the state of North Carolina, the state is dominantly Republican since 1960s. Based on the facts, there are slightly more Democratic voters in North Carolina (2.8 million) than Republican voters (2.0 million). 54% of the voters consist of women. These facts favor Hillary Clinton but still both parties would campaign heavily for those 15 electoral votes. According to the early vote in North Carolina, 40 percent of the electorate already cast the ballot and the amount portrays a significant lead towards the former Secretary of State. Overall, Mrs. Clinton led the early votes by 51 to 39 percent in three way race and 53-39 percent in two-way race. Researchers found out the amount of Democratic voters in North Carolina declined in 2016 compared to the amount four years ago. On the other hand, the amount of Republican voters increased this year compared to the amount in 2012. The number of registered Democratic voters declined by 5.1 percent and the number of early voters have dipped by 3.1 percent. This shows the number of Democratic turnout hasn’t dropped as much as the number of registered Democrats. Another side of the early votes show the early votes of Black voters dropped from 28 percent in 2008 to 23 percent in 2016. This shows the lack of enthusiasm from the North Carolina black voters. It

according to a graph showing the percent of Eligible voters who cast votes. Even though it did

The factors that allowed Abraham Lincoln to capture the election of 1860 with only 39% of the popular vote was the fact that he was able to win every state in the North except for New Jersey. The other candidates were not able to gather the large amount that Lincoln did. Breckinridge for example was only to win some states in the north which were North Carolina, Arkansas, Delaware, and Maryland. In the south he was able to win Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina. Another candidate, Bell was only able to win Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia.

This resulted in much more money being raised in favor of the Republicans, a big part of this impact was the increase in power of the KKK. Many people at this time period felt that if they went along with more Conservative views they’d be better off than, being stuck with another extreme liberal like Woodrow Wilsons. The Republicans used their primary strategy to fight the Democratic party. This came to be an achilles heel for the Democrats because much of what the Democrats were supporting much of what Wilson was trying to do but with some revision. Although, no major third parties had much impact on this election, the rise of the KKK

In the most recent 2012 presidential election; Romney (R) received 57.2 % while Obama (D) received 41.4% (Texas Political Almanac, 2013).

Author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness and an associate professor here at Ohio State, wrote an article “Why Hilary Clinton Doesn’t Deserve the Black Vote.” This article not only touches on how Hilary Clinton is only using black people as her “winning card (Alexander, 2)” in the 2016 Election, but also her past decisions she made as the wife of the 42nd President of the United States that should be taken into consideration by black voters. Mrs. Clinton and Bernie Sanders are the two Democratic Party presidential candidates. Although Bernie Sanders promises “a political revolution that will bring universal healthcare, a living wage, an end to rampant Wall Street greed, and the dismantling of the vast prison state...(Alexander, 5),” Hilary Clinton seems to be receiving all of the black votes, according to recent polls. Alexander explains that because many African Americans believed (and still believe) that Bill Clinton was the first “black president,” Ms. Clinton will receive several black votes.

The year 1876 was an important year for America; it was the hundredth anniversary of The Declaration of Independence. The United States were creating great opportunities for many Americans and immigrants so they could pursue their hopes and dreams. Unfortunately the election of 1876 crushed the dreams of millions of African Americans. Oddly, the election was the same year as the celebration of the United States’ freedom from England while the U.S. was ending its effort to protect the freedom of African Americans in the South. Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate and Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic candidate both ran for presidency. This election saw that Rutherford B. Hayes would eventually be the winner and become President. The election was very close. “…Tilden won the popular vote, the election results in Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana were so close that a winner could not be determined. If these three states went to Hayes, he would win the Electoral College vote and become President” (“North”).

The US Presidential Election of 2000 featured George W. Bush and Al Gore. It will go down in history as one of the most closest elections¡¦ in US history. It also goes down as one of the most controversial. The final decision was based on just a few hundred votes in Florida. The controversy began when the media prematurely declared the winner twice based solely on exit polls. They finally conceded that the Florida count was just too close to predict. It would take a month before the election was ultimately certified after numerous court challenges and vote recounts. Republican candidate George W. Bush was declared the winner of the Florida¡¦s 25 electoral votes. This was a victory by a razor thin margin of popular

The Iowa Caucuses have rules that vary between the Republican and Democratic parties that help maintain the “healthy grassroots politics” throughout the process of the caucus. The Republican caucuses are significantly simpler than the Democratic caucuses and this is due to the fact that the results of the Republican caucuses do not have the same impact on the selection of delegates as the Democratic caucuses. The Democrats select their delegates based solely on their caucus results, whereas Republicans simply take the caucus results into consideration when selecting their delegates. In order to assign delegates, the candidate will need to meet the viability threshold set in place. In other words, Bernie Sanders would need at least 15% of the people attending the caucuses to support him for a delegate to be assigned. Since this specific rule is in place, many more steps must exist in order for the viability threshold to be quantified. For example, a head count is necessary to determine the total amount of registered voters participating. Once this total is established, participants separate into “labeled” groups to determine who supports which candidate. At this point, the viability threshold will determine which candidates get assigned a delegate, based on the support indicated by the amount of voters per

Iowa party chairman Andy McGuire was quoted saying "The results tonight are the closest in Iowa Democratic caucus history". On the Republican side Texas Senator Ted Cruz beat out who many considered the overwhelming favorite Donald Trump with 27.6 percent of the votes to Trumps 24.3 percent. Even more surprising to many on the Republican side Florida Senator Marco Rubio only finished 1.2 percent behind Donald Trump at 23.1 percent. As if the race wasn’t already highly anticipated, Iowa’s caucuses jumped started it to another level!

It was a cold November day as people gathered around their television, eagerly awaiting the news of the 2000 Presidential election. Would the victor be Texas governor George W. Bush or Vice President Al Gore? It was a close election, with Bush only leading by 537 votes. “The 2000 presidential election was the first in 112 years in which a president lost the popular vote, but captured enough states to win the electoral vote.” (The Disputed Election) However, if the majority of eligible Americans would have voted, the outcome may have been different. Throughout American history, the number of voting participants diminishes. According to Warren E. Miller, “[n]early 63 percent of the voting-age populace went to the polls in 1960, when John F. Kennedy

There are roles played both in race and gender played within the presidential election. The Republican party has not done well in the African American community compared the Democratic Party specifically for the Obama Presidential Candidacy. The volume number of voters, mainly colored, came to support in 2012 showing African Americans supported Republicans at 11%, and now it has shifted to Democrats at 80% after the "New Deal". African Americans did not vote for people who had the same identity as them. There was no popularity within the Latino race whatsoever. It is not about race or gender, but now as of 2016 is is. Everyone's vote should be counted the same, because we as humans are created

I got this information off of Dave Leip 's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections on USelectionatlas.com