Historical Management Theories Of The's X & Y Theory And Fayol's Administrative Theory

Classical organizational theory supports two views. Scientific management which focuses on managing work and employees and administrative management which addresses issues which

I will be clarifying how reading "Theory X, Y, Z" and watched the media piece, "Theory," affected my definition of theory. I will be explaining the reasons why it might be useful to make a connection between actual management situations and theory. I will also explain how theory can inform the actual practice of management. I will provide an example of my own supported observation to maintain my statements. In Conclusion, I will explain which of management theories presented in Day 4 Readings seem to be the most useful and why (Walden, 2014).

McGregor referred to the opposing motivational methods that he identified, as Theory X and Theory Y management. Each assumes that the manager 's role is to organize resources, including people, to best benefit the company. However, beyond this commonality, they 're quite dissimilar. While Theory X represents the traditional view of management, Theory Y represents the newer attitudes in organizational psychology.

Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management learning & education, 4(1), 75-91. Retrieved February 7, 2017 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215915763_Bad_Management_Theories_Are_Destroying_Good_Management_Practice

Individual structure would be broken down by the smaller teams that make up one of the functional areas of the company. For example, under the property and casualty division, there directors that have smaller teams that consist of one manager and approximately thirteen employees. The directors in each functional area can range from three to five. The managers on said teams then report to the director and the director then reports to the functional director and so on in the chain, where the info is rolled up and eventually reported to the CEO, in this case Stuart Parker.

After the initial training period each employee is expected to be able to complete all the task

The twentieth century has brought in a number of management theories which have helped shaped our view of management in the present business environment. These emerging theories have enabled managers to appreciate new patterns of thinking, new ways of organising and new ways of managing organisations and people. Over the years these different theories have enabled the study

Successful management requires an understanding of the fundamental concepts of effective management techniques and principles. In order to gain such insight, and manage effectively and efficiently, managers must develop an awareness of past management principles, models and theories. From the turn of the 20th Century, the

Each theory is used organisations although some might have added some more modern techniques, the traditional theory is still the base line of each line of management. With a technological empire, I feel Scientific management has the most opportunity in being able to adapt to our technological advances. In the example of the NCTS organisation, this company has made huge advances in a hi-tech world while still applying the theory of joining man and machine to create a perfect team. Unlike scientific management, administrative and bureaucratic methods can be hindered with new technologies being introduced every day. Some, one highly important managers would no longer be necessary in an organisation due to computer programs being introduced. Companies can reduce the management numbers for more effective

Managing resources efficiently and effectively is the most fundamental goal for organisation which aims to maximise individual and social prosperity. Therefore, the management theory is constantly developing. In 20th century, there were several management theories proposed such as scientific management, administrative management, behavioural management, etc. as increasingly aware of human are crucial element of the organisation and vital in influencing overall organisational performance, Douglas McGregor who studied about how workers’ behaviour effect the manager’s leadership, proposed Theory X and Y (Waddell et al. 2007). It is no doubt this conventional concept still correct in 21st century, however, business environment is significant

Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager's face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.

Managers today have many different options when choosing a managerial theory to implement for their organizations. Knowledgeable managers must be aware of the different historical approaches and also able to determine which approach would be most effective for their unit. The established work structure of my unit currently utilizes elements of classical organizational theory, more specifically scientific management and bureaucratic theory. More recent theories, such as those that focus on human relations, are not applied as frequently. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the historical management theories utilized by my organization and determine whether they are appropriate. When areas in which my organization could be improved upon are identified, the recommendations of other management theories are considered for their possible effectiveness.

First, I will discuss the exemplary management theories that transpired around the twentieth century. These involve scientific management, which center of attraction was on associating per-sonnel and jobs to increase effectiveness; and administrative management, which center of atten-tion is on recognizing the principles that will impel to the beginning of the nearly adept structure of management and organization. Next, you have behavioral management theories which was estab-lished both prior and subsequently the Second World War, which spotlight was on supervisors should guide and supervise their personnel to optimize their effectiveness. Then you have man-agement science theory, which was current during the Second World War and which has evolved to be very

Early management theories adopted by such proponents as Henri Fayol, Mary Parker Follett and Max Weber are relevant in todays’ world. In this essay I am going to discuss about all three theorists and how their theories are still relevant for managers in the 21st century in meeting the challenges. In the classical approach to management there are three branches under it. They are, scientific management, administrative principles and bureaucratic organisation. Henry Fayol and Mary Parker Follett developed theories for administrative principles and Max Weber developed a theory for bureaucratic organisation (Schermerhorn et al. 2014, p.36). First we will be going through Henri Fayol and then Mary Parker Follett as they both made theories

management theory "A collection of ideas which set forth general rules on how to manage a ‎business or organization. Management theory addresses how managers and supervisors relate to ‎their organizations in the knowledge of its goals, the implementation of effective means to get ‎the goals accomplished and how to motivate employees to perform to the highest standard".‎