Historical Representation: An Undervalued Paradox Essay

1274 Words6 Pages
Historical media, most specifically film, has existed since history began. The recounting of prior events to a new audience to portray the feelings and the emotions of the time typically is transferred through conversation, but modern technology allows for the mass-production of not only the recounting of historical events on large screens, but also the possible re-creation of those events. When something is re-created, the new product simply, by definition, could not put into perspective the overall effects of historical events properly. To captivate and to understand the death of one man for another on a movie screen hurts my head to even contemplate. One of the first American films, The Birth of A Nation, by D.W. Griffith, pioneers…show more content…
Resnais initially cuts to documentary-like footage for the first section of the film, typifying life in the camps, and the early movement of the Holocaust. This introduction is followed by a hard cut back into an omniscient perspective from the historical present, also showing footage of the camps, but from more recent moments. When Resnais initially cuts from the past to the “present”, the narrator reflects: “Who does know anything? The reality of these camps, despised by those who built them and unfathomable to those who endured them, what hope do we have of truly capturing this reality,” (Night and Fog). By creating an image of what proper representation may be, and by hinting at the hardships in recreating and capturing history, Resnais critiques the very way in which we document and represent the un-representable, offering a valid exception in the form of “Night and Fog” itself. Marguerite Waller reflects upon historical representations saying thta “Representations in the sense that one position or effect can stand for another (whereby for example, [A female lead] could stand for women, who could stand for victims, who could stand for Jews) would require the inert, monocular vision enforced by binary logic that produces a kind of “truth” in which people and events appear to stay put” (Waller 269). This binary logic “limits historical understanding, concealing possibilities that could
Open Document