preview

History 151

Decent Essays

Are a people ever justified in openly violating laws (like the Fugitive Slave Act) that they disapprove of and think immoral? What has been the fate of such laws in U.S. history? Should the majority always Rule I believe that if the law is so immoral that it causes harm you have an obligation to disobey. According to the law, it was the responsibility of the federal government to help owners recapture these runaway slaves, who were denied any legal means to try and fight their return to slavery. After the Fugitive Slave Law led to many conflicts between Northern abolitionists and Southern slave owners in the 1850s, the outbreak of the U.S. Civil War at the start of the next decade essentially rendered the law meaningless. Yes the majority …show more content…

President James K. Polk sent the army under the leadership of General (and later President) Zachary Taylor to the Rio Grande to establish a fort. After seeing the Americans construct the fort in what they considered to be their land, the Mexicans sent 2,000 troops to attack a U.S. scout force, consisted of only 70 American troops. When Polk heard of this attack, he plead Congress to declare war on Mexico for invading American land. Congress agreed and by May of 1846, the two countries were at war. The Texas Annexation was controversial it was approved by Congress through a simple majority instead of using a treaty to annex the Republic of Texas. After no treaty was reached between the United States and Texas for the annexation or Texas, a joint resolution was passed in Congress to annex Texas. A popular vote in Texas approved the annexation of Texas to the United States in October 1845.
Why would persons who had eyewitnesses slavery in the south offer such radically differing accounts? What would have been the future of slavery if it had been left alone? Eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable. Ask any cop on earth. The institution of slavery wasn't a small isolated crime witnessed by just a few people. It was huge and the severity of the crime was different in various places it took place. There were also people that had convinced themselves that they (white people) were superior to them

Get Access