History Essay Spanish Civil War

The Spanish American War was caused by many occasions. America strongly supported Cuba and disputed Spain’s actions. The main causes of The Spanish American war was the yellow journalism, the blowing up of “The maine”, and the de lome letter. This essay will be discussing the causes and effects of the Spanish American War.

Throughout history, as we study Spain we can clearly recognize high and low points in their success. In the fifteen hundreds Spain had no influence on European affairs, Spain essentially vanished out of Europe. However, within one complete century Spain had become not only a leading power but they also had a great sense of effectiveness in Europe. Spain experienced a Golden age with many social, economic, political aspects. On the other hand, within

The evidence that supports the idea that the Nationalists won the Spanish Civil War because of their strength is abundant. The unity of the Nationalists was obvious and meant that there was both great organisation and co-ordination, meaning there was no ambiguity in the goals set by those fighting for the Nationalists. Franco’s plans for a long term war meant that he was able to ensure the defeat of the Republic by slowly squeezing the life out of the Republic war effort, which already was heavily reliant on Soviet aid, by securing Republican strong holds throughout Spain. The contrasting lack of unity on the Republic as well

The Spanish Civil War was a war in Spain that lasted from 1936 to 1939 between the government of the Second Republic and army officers who wanted to overthrow it. The government and its supporters were known as Republicans’, while the army and its alliances were known as Nationalists. A main and important figure for the Nationalists was Fransico Franco, a general that became dictator for Spain until his death in 1975. General Emilio Mola, a Nationalist general, thought this conflict between the Republicans’ and the Nationalists would end quickly. He believed workers that went against the government would be crushed quickly. However, the conflict turned into a long, bloody war, with the Republicans’ admitting defeat. In

The Spanish civil war is often seen as a fundamental divide between right and left- the first major struggle between Fascism and Communism. The Spanish civil war started distinctly as a Spanish civil war born out of Spanish disputes, but it was soon to take on an international character. The military situations were practically equal to both sides before the foreign intervention. However, after Germany, Italy, and USSR intervened the situation changed dramatically.

The late stages of the White terror that occurred during the rule of Francisco Franco had caused Spain to appear as if it were a prison. Anyone who opposed or spoke out against the dictatorship was right before the military courts where they were most likely to be condemned or imprisoned. 3 .All other political parties were abolished so that there would be no opposition tof-e ilie Nationalist policies. All labor unions were also abolished because they were believed to be leftist in nature. Regional languages such as Basque

The Spanish civil war of 1936-1939 was an important conflict in Spain’s history. This war was initiated by a military revolt led by General Francisco Franco on the 17 July 1936 and ended with Franco’s victory on the 1 April, 1939. This victory resulted in the replacement of the Second Spanish Republic with the conservative dictatorship of Franco. This conflict triggered the clash of the various cultures and ideologies within Spain. One important example of an ideological clash was that of Communism versus Fascism. This clash was so important that, based on an analysis of the level of involvement of Fascist and Communist factions in said clash, one must concede that the conflict between Communism and Fascism was represented to a great

The Spanish Civil War is the name given to the struggle between loyalist and nationalist Spain for dominance in which the nationalists won and suppressed the country for the following thirty nine years. However, because of the larger political climate that the Spanish Civil War occurred in, it is impossible to view the war as a phenomenon contained within one nation. Despite its obvious domestic orientation as a civil war it was a major international conflict. The reason for this, I would maintain, is the political dogma which surrounded the war. This essay takes the form of a political survey of the

Franco was backed by Germany and Italy, a huge advantage to him. The German air force, “Luftwafa”, was the greatest in the world at the time. This, plus 70,000 troops combined sent by them created a nearly unstoppable force. On the other hand you had the Republic, which was backed by America, Canada and Soviet Russia. The Russian forces were a great advantage at first because of their perceivable unlimited natural resources along with the T-34 tank. This however would prove to later be a weakness because the tanks were of poor quality and broke down all the time, leading in part to the Russian withdraw from the war greatly weakening the republics forces overall. Still the republic did not lose hope, on July 6th 1937 they lunched an offensive known as the “Battle of Brunete” a location just west of Madrid. A location near the homes of a lot of the soldiers from both sides, men whom before the war were just everyday people, farmers, merchants and working class folk. Those of which voices and opinions fell upon deaf ears during the monarchy, and then they were heard. They joined sides based on what they believed and fought for what they wanted whether it be change or stability. This battle fought by the average man changed the course of the war in favor of Franco and his forces. By October 19, 1937 all of northern Spain was under the control of the

     The government of Spain dissolved once again and Franco was removed from the general staff. He was moved to duty in the Canary Islands. Although it was against Franco’s nature to oppose the government, he joined Nationalist rebels against the government.

Generalissimo Francisco Franco came into power after his victory in the Civil war in 1939 and ruled over Spain till his death in 1975. In this 40-year period Spain was massive changed that causes much debate as to the political nature of Franco’s regime whether it is fascist or something different, Francoism. To understand if Franco’s regime was fascist, fascism must first be defined. There are many working definitions of a fascist regime, Stanley Payne’s states that the dictator must alien his regime to the idea of anti-isms, them being aintiliberalism, antidemocratic, anticonservatism, anticommunism and antidemocratic. Payne states these are fundamental in the description of a fascist regime. Another useful definition is Robert Griffin, stating that a fascist regime will use symbolism, violence to pursue its political aims, with the importance aimed at expansionism. Finally Griffin also states the need of the dictator to implement an authoritarian and totalitarian government. All these help to create a fascist regime and more importantly a truly fascist dictator. There is little doubt Franco holds to some of these definitions yet in later year the idea of Francosim becomes more viable however to understand if Franco was a truly fascist dictator we must look to the similarities and differences and determine by examining Franco’s rise politically his general style of government and finally his foreign policies it will determined whether Franco was a truly fascist dictator.

In the 1920’s and 30’s, Spain was under a lot of political strain and tensions, which would eventually lead to the Spanish Civil War. There was a major political divide between the Republicans and Nationalists. Nationalists, the right-wing government, had a major supporter base consisting of: landowners, military leaders, and the Roman Catholic Church. On the other hand, Republicans who were the polar opposite, being the left-wing administration, had supporter base consisting of: urban workers, agricultural labourers, communists, and the educated middle class. The Republican aim was to create a modern democracy by limiting the power of the army and the Roman Catholic Church and empowering trade unions and owners. Conversely, Nationalists had a more conservative aim which was to protect those who were powerful and wealthy, keep Catholicism the predominant religion in Spain, and creating a powerful army. With this in mind, it is quite

The war was an outcome of a polarization of Spanish life and politics that had developed over previous decades. On one side (the Nationalist) were most Roman Catholics, important elements of the military, most

In the 1930’s , Spain was a really divided country, it was politically divided between the right-wing also called Nationalists and the left-wing or Republican parties. Both parties were made up of different organisations, in the the nationalist party you could find monarchists , land owners , employers the Catholic Church and the army. The left-wing was prinicipally made of workers and socialits. The economics of the country was really bad cause of the Great Depression after the Wall street Crash. The wall street crash had a huge consequence in spain at that time , the military dictatorship that had ruled spain since 1923 broke down. The King then abdicated after the Republicans came to power. After this event the country was suffering

As a result of the recession, there was a large gap between the rich and the poor within Spain. Due to this situation, the sustainability of democracy in Spain became questionable- as the poor didn’t trust the wealthy and wanted to change things, creating a divide within Spain. The large structural barrier between the two classes didn’t allow the poor classes to move out of their wretched situation. Social and economic structural problems were undoubtedly severe, the worst being the plight of the newly two million landless farmworkers and their families, a plight made much more conflictive by the fact that Spain was now a rapidly country with democratic mass mobilization. The low wages, limited productivity and poor living conditions of four million more urban workers in the industry. This drove them to want change in the form of democracy- allowing them to have a say in their future. “Although, the obduracy of the conservative and the privileged, and the unwillingness of the main party of the right, the CEDA, to accept the Republic and the readjustment of the wealth necessary to make democracy work (Blinkhorn 37).” Many historians have sought to criticize the attempt to democratize a country so clearly and grossly racked by inequality. Without a common consensus among the people, democracy’s fate within Spain became