History Of Kosovo Essay

Threats of communism and the bipolarity of the Cold War spurred the United States to develop a global foreign policy. These threats from the Soviet Union caused the United States to consider new policies and national interests in countries that it had not previously had strong interests in or policies towards, like the Republic of Kosovo. Kosovo has always been a controversial territory within the nation of Serbia. Throughout history, the region has consistently been populated by Kosovars whom ethnically identify more with Albania than Serbia. This has led to much strife between the people in the region and neighboring governments like Serbia.

“The taking of hostages was an immoral act. We had to do whatever we could just to eliminate that dirty story from the history of Serbs.” (Slobodan Milosevic in an interview for the Time magazine, 1995).

The balance of power theory represents a body of interrelated concepts for achieving security and stability by maintaining an equal distribution of power throughout the international system. Some critics contend that the theory cannot provide guidance to states in a unipolar system since it developed out of centuries of multipolarity and recent decades of bipolarity. This assessment is incorrect. Although a specific conception of balance of power theory may not provide guidance, an appraisal of the concepts within its various forms suggests continuing relevance. This paper discusses balance of power theory by examining its evolution, and asserts that the concept remains relevant in a unipolar international system.

In 1992 Bosnia and Herzegovina had one the biggest genocide to come after WWII, in turn killing over 800,000 civilians. The war consisted of two factions, the Croats and Serbs, both wanting territory in Bosnia. Soon Radovan Karadžić, former Bosnian Serb president, created a special army to support the Serbs, soon the Serbs started the new policy for “ethnic cleansing” many areas of non-Serb. For it was later that it was to be decided that is was complete and utter genocide towards the innocent.

To comprehend the significance of Balance of Power, we ought to make the inquiry of what we see by `power’. Although it’s hard to characterize or quota it, power is the capacity to “do something or act in a particular way” or even Nye (2009:65) contends “the ability to achieve one’s purposes or goals.” At the end of the day, the possibility to impact other individuals to do what you need them to do. As several academics would approve that balance of power can scarcely have an accurate meaning. In the nineteenth-century, British open-minded Richard Codden gave a convincing definition which expresses that balance of power is “a chimera – an undescribed, indescribable, incomprehensible nothing”. Although, this essay will attempt to comprehend, investigate and discriminatingly examine the way of this idea utilizing two examples from the late 19th and 20th century, i.e. the Cold War and the pre-WWI conditions.

she can’t go up to one of their posts in Albania. The soldier would reply “We

The 1990s conflict in Kosovo is one that has been identified as a result of a long running and intractable dispute. The dispute identified is one between Kosovo’s Albanians or Kosovar, and the Serbians. The reasons for the dispute stem from several issues, each can be attributed to increasing the intractability of the conflict.

order was given from the ministry of defense, who had no authority to do so.

NATO’s decision to intervene in Kosovo without the authorization of the Security Council raised doubts in the international arena among human rights activists about the legitimacy of the operation. This essay will argue that NATO’s intervention in Kosovo was legitimate because it was both legal and just. In so doing, this essay will start by carefully reading the U.N. Charter provisions that permit the use of force on limited grounds in order to set the legal conditions for intervention (Mertus 2000: 1751). NATO’s legitimacy in Kosovo will be scrutinized focusing on the emerging body of international law, which permits intervention for humanitarian purposes. Likewise, a just-war analysis will be applied to examine the morality of the decision to wage war, and the morality of the means and methods by which the war was conducted (Schroeder 2004: 180). The essay will eventually conclude that humanitarian intervention is now legal and widely accepted by most states

The Yugoslavian Conflict Yugoslavia is a country burdened by feuding sides in a war that cannot soon be resolved. The United Nations are attempting to help the situation, but until the people of Yugoslavia can come to an agreement continued warfare and heartache is inevitable. The problems in Yugoslavia began because the country is separated into two distinct parts. The north and west parts of the country were once under the rule of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and the south and the east were controlled by the Ottoman Empire.

The conflict in the Balkans is interesting because for years, reporters and politicians have touted it as being the result of ancient ethnic hatred. The first phase of Yugoslavian disintegration can be attributed to the conditions of the people living in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Yugoslavia. In 1981, the socioeconomic conditions in Kosovo were far worse than those in the other republics of Yugoslavia. Poverty was rampant and unemployment was around twenty percent as compared to about two percent in Slovenia that same year. The standard of living in Kosovo was deplorable and whatever aid was given to the province by the federal government was mismanaged. Another significant problem with this

Realism, winning the first great debate in the 1930’s has been the dominant theory in International Relations since its beginning. Realist argues that we should take the world as it really is rather that what we perceive to be idealistic. Realism holds that the state is its key component and that as an academic theory; it exists with the sole purpose of providing the science of international politics that could study the real laws and behaviours of mankind. The central idea of this theory is one of power and security, premised on the grounds that power play and violent resolutions are simply inevitable. Realism connotes independence through power for the greater good of national interest above human interest that justifies its reasoning for

Yugoslavia was a very successful country under the lead of Josip Broz Tito. Yugoslavia was made of 6 Republics and those were: Croatia, Montenegro ,Bosnia & Herzegovina, Montenegro, Slovenia, Serbia, Macedonia and Kosovo together with Vojvodina which at that time were recognized as provinces. After the death of Tito Yugoslavia began to demolish. The collapse of Yugoslavia began in 1980, and it continued until the 27th of April 1992, which in history is known as the date when Yugoslavia totally collapsed. In my opinion, the reason that the disintegration of Yugoslavia happened was because of the decline in absolute sovereignty. In this paper, I am going to talk about the definition of sovereignty, different perspectives about the disintegration of Yugoslavia from some authors and the decline in absolute sovereignty which led to the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

A unilateral declaration of independence by Kosovo's February 17, 2008 has caused mixed reactions in the international community. To date, Kosovo's independence from Serbia was recognized by 110 states out of 193 (56.9%), the United Nations Member States (the United Nations). At the same time, other states - members of the United Nations (more than 1/3), including two permanent UN Security Council members (China and Russia), refused to recognize the independence of Kosovo or declared neutrality. In order to take a seat at the UN, country must have the support of 2/3 of the states - members of the UN (129 out of 193) and the approval of the UN Security Council, in particular, the absence of a veto of any permanent member of the Security Council

There was a transformation in this school of thought, from classical realism to neo-realism. In the 1970s, the analytical focus of realism shifted from a classical, philosophical foundation to a more scientific understanding, also known as neo-realism. Classical realists believe that states, similar to humans, has a instinctive desire to dominate others which was the sole cause of war. However, neo-realists altered the focus to the effects of the international system and how each state can only survive on its own. Additionally, they have a strong lack of trust and cooperation in international affairs.