History of Warfare and the Rules of Engagement

714 Words3 Pages
The Information Assignment Introduction Throughout the history of warfare the rules of engagement (ROE) were designed to control the actions of soldiers and focus them on achieving the larger objectives. In Vietnam, the ROE was utilized to constrain the activities of personnel in these areas. This because of continuing worries about the possibility of the war escalating into a larger conflict. To understand how this occurred requires examining the limited war strategy in conjunction with the six points in the chain of command. These factors will show the effectiveness of this policy and its long term impacts on the outcome of the war. ("Effects of Restrictive Rules," 1995) (Lewy, 1978) (Moss, 2010) Soldiers in the field: For soldiers, the ROE was utilized to determine how they are supposed to respond to a particular situation. This is because their actions would have an effect on the perceptions of the war. Over the course of time, this created confusion in many units about their ability to engage the enemy. This resulted in greater casualties and losses from not taking the fight to the North Vietnamese. Moreover, these policies did not apply to South Vietnamese forces. This was problematic, as they were allowed to use certain practices that were restricted by the ROE. When this happened, there were increasing amounts of confusion and adverse impacts on morale. ("Effects of Restrictive Rules," 1995) (Lewy, 1978) (Moss, 2010) Battalion commanders: In the case of
Open Document