Hitler Vs Stalin

During World War I, Hitler had joined the army and his experience especially his injury was believed to be one of the main reasons for him being so eager to improve his country quickly. His emotions such as pain and hatred towards the army stimulated his hidden ambition. In Germany, Hitler used the power of enabling law to get rid of most things he didn?t want, for example he used his secret polices to arrest the opposition. On the other hand, under the influence of Marxism Stalin emphasized the idea of communism, where all citizens worked for the country is different from the concept of democracy where individuals have priority. In communism, a dictator leader is often needed in order to put the policies into practice, because other political parties cause the communism regime to fall apart, especially in undeveloped countries. The public needed to believe that communism was absolute and the only way to good life in order to make the system work smoothly. The similarities here were that they rejected all opposition political parties, but they used different concepts-Mussolini and Hitler did not introduce the communism idea.

Whereas Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler are different as Joseph Stalin was the Communist leader of the Soviet Union, while Adolf Hitler was the Nazi leader of Germany; they both were more concerned with consolidating and expanding their own power, rather than pleasing the people.

The biggest difference in the two's method on becoming the central figure in their countries government was Hitler's was very short, and acted more on instinct to win over the respect of his country in a little over a year. While Stalin's was more of a very strategic chess match, so he had to build his positions slowly and had to remove many contenders that would enable him in his goal. Then very carefully set up his last opposition for his crucial, checkmate.

Adolf Hitler and Francisco Franco were both authoritarian dictators who had extremely similar goals for their country. While their ideas and desires were relatively the same, their rise to power and their consolidation of said power have significant and notable differences. While Franco went on to rule Spain until his death in 1975, both dictators had been in power at the same time, and with their similar ideas had formed a cordial relationship.

Adolf Hitler was appointed German Chancellor on January 30, 1933. His regime brought citizens no guaranteed basic rights. In 1933, the first Nazi concentration camps were built. The initial camps imprisoned political opponents, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, gypsies, and others classified as dangerous. During Hitler’s first six years, German Jews had more than 400 decrees and regulations. The first major law against the Jews was, the “Law for Restoration of the Professional Civil Service” of April 7, 1933. That law made Jews and “politically unreliable” employees excluded from state service. The laws began to go further by, restricting the numbers of Jews in schools and colleges, and taking business away from Jewish doctors and

An interesting similarity between Hitler and Stalin is their childhood. Both Hitler and Stalin grew up with abusive

The article is written by Peter Ross Range, who's also the author of the book 1924: The year that made Hitler and his next book will examine Hitler's rise to power. So he is very well- known with the Dictator Adolf Hitler.

Dictatorship throughout the ages has mainly led to oppression and conflict between people and government. Some of the notoriously bad dictators took office around the 1920’s and 1930’s. There were three main dictators in that time period and they all ran different countries in very different ways. Josef Stalin was known as the dictator of the Soviet Union, he was all about communism and did not care if there was opposition to his ideas. On the other hand, Benito Mussolini was in charge of Italy and all about fascism. Possibly the worst known dictator of all times was Hitler, in charge of, Germany, he was all about Nazism. Each had a different outlook on ruling, but they all did things similarly to lead to nations hatred against them. Basically, their ultimate goal was to do what was best for their countries, however, there want for power tended to get in the way. They all wanted to accomplish many things, they used many different ideas and ways to run their nations. They were all blamed for their nations demise in one way or another. This essay will discuss the similarities and differences between Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini.

Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were not born into their power. They both had to achieve the status of being able to rule. Adolf Hitler was known for his strategies to gain the amount of power he had. He started out as a homeless artist and was not a very successful man. Hitler made his way into the German Workers’ Party in the year 1919. He would then turn that program into the Nazi Party when he became leader. “But in the chaos of post-World War I Germany, it was Hitler's group that would gain dominance” (Pappas, 1). What gave the Nazi Party such an advantage over the many other parties, was having Hitler and his skills in speeches. Hitler was able to gain fame and create a fraud image of himself. How Joseph Stalin gained his share of power is different than Adolf Hitler. Stalin was more on his own and did not use a party to make his way to dominance. After Vladimir Lenin died in 1924, Stalin was able to outcompete

Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are 2 notoriously known people in world history. Both Stalin and Hitler are known for the great number of deaths they have caused. Although both men have totally different reasons on why they killed so many people their ways of leadership are somewhat alike.

     Hitler came to power in 1935. His basis of hatred was director towards the Jews. One reason for the hatred towards the Jews was because his mother was sick with cancer, and it was a Jewish doctor that could not save her. Hitler had no real friends when he came to power, and he killed all of the ones he did have. Stalin came to power in 1924. They called him, “The man of Many Faces”. The people that really knew him as a person were terrified of him. All of Stalin’s generals were in fear of him, but stayed faithful to him. When Hitler attacked, he moved in with precision accuracy and moved quickly through the town of village he was destroying. Stalin on the other hand took a four to five year period of time to strike all of the villages and towns. Even in death Stalin was a killer. Stalin was paranoid by an assassination on him. To prevent assassination, Stalin would never sleep in the same

First, both of these men had issues growing up with their father. When Adolf was a child, his father had a successful career in the customs bureau and he wanted his son to have the same job. Adolf wanted to go to classical school so he could become an artist. Adolf intentionally did poor in school so his father could see his grades and let him go to school to be an artist. When his father passed away, Adolf’s grades began to become progressively worse and his mother allowed him to go to school to become an artist. Joseph Stalin’s family owned a shoemaker shop when he was born. While Joseph was growing up his parent’s shop began to take a turn for the worse and it eventually close. With the shop closed, the death of his two infant sons, and the family living in poverty, Josephs father turned to alcohol to solve his problems. His alcoholism made Josephs father become more violent and aggressive to his family and his son. Joseph and his mother eventually left their home and moved in to a house of a family friend.

Given that my questions were: why his dad was so abusive to would Stalin? would it have been more different if he grew up in a better place and had a less abusive father? Would Stalin have still tried to dominate the world if he didn't grow up through a rough time? Through all this what was he thinking? Lastly, I am amazed by Joseph Stalin since he managed to reign in absolute rule for 25 years and throughout his time of reign he had his country and the world under his finger just by manipulation and deceit. It amazes me how people still liked him even after all the deaths he has caused, even through the manipulation and by the end of his life he practically brainwashed everyone and that's just amazing scary. People even today still look at him as an ideal leader, as a great role model or even a

for is a difference in this two regimes . A pure race and Arians were

One issue that grabbed my attention from the book was that leaders can come in different shapes and forms with different motives but have the same techniques to influence people to follow them. The book compared Martin Luther King to Adolf Hitler. I felt that this comparison was very strange to me because Dr. King was a very passive leader. He believed in non-violence and wanted everyone to live together in harmony. Hitler on the other hand was a very aggressive leader. He chose to use force to get his point across. He had the belief that the only people that god wanted to live in harmony were blonde haired blue eyed persons. Even though these two leaders were completely different they both had the same style to influence their followers. They spoke very highly of their beliefs and stayed true to what they said no matter what anyone said to them or tried to do to them. I feel that a good leader cannot be a follower. No matter if your intentions are good or evil you have to be true to your motives and desires to gain the trust of your followers.