Hofstede's Five Dimensions

The lack of precision and the lack of a universally applicable framework for classifying cultural patterns have been addressed by a number of researchers. The most famous and most often cited work in this area is the research by the Dutch organizational anthropologist Hofstede.

The most famous researcher of prevailing cultures in different countries goes by the name of Geert Hofstede. “He conducted one of the most comprehensive studies of how values in the workplace are influenced by culture” (). With the help of his research team, Professor Geert Hofstede created a model of national culture consisting of six dimensions. “The cultural dimensions represent independent preferences for on state of affairs

Douglas & Wier (2005) mention that Hofstede(1980) fails to incorporate multi-culturalism and different ethnicities in a specific ‘national culture’. This is the reason they added additional values to the original framework in their analysis.

According to Hofstede, culture is defined as “the collective mental programming of the human mind which distinguishes one group of people from another” (6). Our cultural differences often times lead to misunderstanding and conflict. However, the knowledge of Hofstede indices can serve as a useful tool to understand how and why people think or act the way they do. My goal in this essay is to explain how the Hofstede indices, in addition to other skills, enables those in leadership roles and helping professions (professions like medicine, nursing, psychotherapy, psychological counseling, social work, education,

Geert Hofstede developed the widely applied Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, which mainly focuses on how different countries with different cultural backgrounds handle different anthropological problems that occur in cross-cultural communication (Hofstede 1980). The first five Hofstede’s dimensions will be discussed in following paragraphs. It should be clear that there is no good and bad between two elements in each dimension since every culture has its unique features and ways to function.

Geert Hofstede is an influential Dutch researcher in the fields of organizational studies and more concretely organizational culture, also cultural economics and management. He is a well-known pioneer in his research of cross-cultural groups and organizations and played a major role in developing a systematic framework for assessing and differentiating national cultures and organizational cultures. His studies demonstrated that there are national and regional cultural groups that influence behavior of societies and organizations.

Professor Geert Hofstede is a Dutch social psychologist who has extensively studied the interactions between different cultures and their influences in the workplace. His theory is found on the concept that value can be placed on six different cultural dimensions. These dimensions include, power, collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity, temporal orientation, and indulgence ("Geert Hofstede and cultural dimensions theory," 2011). His data was gathered through surveys carried out by his former employer International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). With his data, he projected a scoring system from one to one hundred and twenty which scores countries based on the dimensions from his

He characterized hierarchical society is a thought framework that is generally imparted between authoritative parts. By separating out IBM 's overwhelming corporate society from his information on IBM 's national auxiliaries, Hofstede had the capacity measurably recognized social contrasts between nations.

Geert Hofstede is a Dutch social psychologist. When he was an IBM employee between 1967 and1973, he developed a theory that helped form a framework for cross-cultural communication. This theory was known as Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory. It describes the effects of a society’s culture on the values of its members and how these values relate to behavior using a structure derived from factor analysis.

The Hofstede’s theory has really brought some of my own personal thoughts on my cultural background to light. This was the first time I ever heard about Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions. I am American and there are things about the traits for American Culture that I thought was just something based on where you are from in regards to the United States. I always felt that since I was raised in Brooklyn, NY my parents expected me to think this way. The biggest for me was the biggest on the scale was Individualism (91). I was raised know that I am different and everyone is different but special in their way. No matter who you are, you still bring something to the table. Indulgence (68) was the second highest and I myself is firm believer in work

Culture is often described as “The way we do things around here” (Charles Handy, 1999).

Latham (2012) outlines four of the broad categories of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, including low-high power distance, individualism-collectivism, masculinity-femininity, and uncertainty avoidance, which will be discussed here. Power distance can be thought of as the extent in which members of a culture accept inequality

Hofstede 's cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication, developed by Geert Hofstede and led by his curiosity as a social psychologist to the compare different nations. The framework describes the effects of a society 's culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behavior. His theory consist of six dimensions along which cultural values could be analyzed (The Hofstede Center, n.d.). The dimensions are:

Greet Hofstede is a Dutch social psychologist who did a comprehensive study of culture across modern nations. His most popular book is Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (1991). He conducted a pioneering studies of how values in

They emphasized on adaptation and interpretation, as well as finding similarities in their audiences’ cultures. By identifying how western culture and non-western culture fit into each dimension of Hofstede’s original concept, one can better understand how to approach audiences from the audiences’ cultural