preview

Homeland Security

Decent Essays

In response to the devastating events that occurred on September 11, 2001, the Department of Homeland Security was created. A new perspective that the tragic attack forced upon the government was that our borders started way beyond the water’s edge and to effectively combat national security threats, they had to be stopped prior to reaching our borders. That is one realization that has caused international governments to work together to help one another track and monitor travel and threat potential from individuals around the world. Another key perspective that the attack brought to the government was the need for interagency coordination. Why? Homeland Security is not cannot be tackled from solely and international perspective, government …show more content…

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria is a terrorist organization on the United States’ Foreign Terrorist watch list that has been able to successfully recruit both homegrown volunteers who stay with U.S. borders to commit terrorist acts on behalf of the organization, and foreign fighters who leave the United States to join Arms in Syria. Since March of two-thousand and fourteen one hundred and eleven individuals within the United States has been charged with offenses related to ISIS, fifty-eight have pleaded or were found guilty. The Islamic state of Iraq and Syria started as a rebel organization that has rapidly gained territory within Syria since 2014 and has proven to be somewhat revolutionary. From its ability to attract thousands of volunteers across sovereign state and international lines, to its resilience to sustained U.S- lead bombing campaigns and its regular spectacular acts of violence. (Kalyvas 2015) Although ISIS was not the perpetrators of the September eleven attacks, they have earned a number one spot as an international threat to many countries due to its ability to recruit homegrown extremist and foreign …show more content…

I will argue that there is a statistically significant difference between those who chose to be a foreign fighter and those who chose to commit extremist acts within the United States on behalf of ISIS. This is due to the difference in the cost-benefit analysis of the two phenomenon that are weighed by a radicalized individual. I believe that more individuals that are radicalized will become foreign fighters because the benefit of physical inclusion and proximity to ISIS territory outweighs the cost of joining and being a part of a designated terrorist organization. While on the other hand, although a more feasible option, the benefit of commit a terrorist act on behalf of ISIS is not outweigh the cost of being labeled a terrorist within the United States. As my data set I will solely be focusing on those that have been convicted of charges related to ISIS controlling for age, gender, and time sentenced. Since there is no data on potential recruits I will attempt to explain my findings through different social movement theories to explain both the differences in the two phenomenon and the causes. I will measure my theories based on the plea of those charged with crimes related to ISIS since that is the best way to measure the cost benefit analysis conducted by the individuals. For reasons explained

Get Access