Homo Floresiensis Research Paper

The infamous event of the Piltdown hoax is one that continues to draw speculative attention over a century after the initial announcement of the paleoanthropological findings. Although many scientists, especially those involved in the field of paleoanthropology, would like to forget the incident entirely, the Piltdown man—taxonomically referred to as Eoanthropus dawsoni—is perhaps the greatest hoax in anthropological history. By 1912, British archaeologists and paleontologists were desperate for a significant paleoanthropological finding that would provide the missing link between humans and apes in hominin evolution (Prosser, 2009). The Piltdown man was originally a famous finding that straddled the human-animal boundary, dichotomously

While survival would have been a key goal for the first Tennesseans as the years went by, the four prehistoric tribes evolved and developed increasingly more advanced techniques to move from simply surviving to living. These four prehistoric tribes include the Paleo tribe, the Archaic tribe, the Woodland tribe and the Mississippian tribe. These tribes dealt with changing climates and fluctuating food sources, which defined their developing lifestyles and left clues for future generations to study and share.

You're probably wondering who are the Paleo-Indians? Well the Paleo Indians were known as Native Americans. Archeologists assume that the Paleo Indians,were sometimes referred to as Clovis people. The Paleo Indians lived 15000 B.C. to the end of the Pleistocene Ice Age at about 7,000 B.C. Paleo Indians were originally natives of Asia, who migrated to our continent near the end of the recent Ice Age. The Paleo Indians were believed to be nomadic, meaning they were always moving, so they traveled in small groups of 20 to 50 people. Since they were always on the move they traveled light.

dy of plant fossils and the understanding the evolution of plant life and ecology of earlier eras is known as paleobotany. Paleobotanists concern with fossil records of plants and their geologic history greatly describes the main concept of paleobotany. Only a small percentage of the plants that ever lived left evidence of existence. The major plant fossils that have been discovered are mineralized wood, flowers in amber, leaf imprints in coal, or other plant life many years ago. Paleobotanists document fossil records and use this evidence to find the past evolution of plants.

The specimens are not fossilized, but were reported in a Nature news article as having “the consistency of wet blotting paper” (once exposed, the bones had to be left to dry before they could be dug up). Researchers hope to discover preserved mitochondrial DNA to compare and contrast with samples from similarly unfossilized specimens of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens (www.en.wikipedia.org). Some are hoping to find a relationship between

The palebians made up the majority of the population. But they were not allowed to have any say in political issues. The palebians were the poor, lower class citizens who couldn't become priests or be a part of the senate. They were the peasants, craftsmen, farmers, and shopkeepers. On the other hand, the patricians were the ones who were wealthy (the upper class) and the only ones that could have power in religious offices, in the senate, and could control over the military. Unllike the Palebians, the patricians were the smaller part of the population that had all the power. But just because the Patricians had all the control over Rome, this did not mean that the Palebians weren't important or "necessary"

This particular assumption is at the heart of a lot of the debate surrounding Lb1. It has sparked theories and debate of scientists who insist that Lb1 was just the mutated remains of a modern day homo sapien (ii). This has been disproved throughout various scientific reports instead saying that homo floresiensis is instead the distant answer of a species of hominin that evolved independent of the branch that stemmed Homo Neanderthal and Homo

Every year farmers’ crops are subject to droughts, floods, storms, and so much more. But one of the biggest problems that seem to be plaguing the agricultural industry, specifically the cabbage and lettuce industry, is pests. One pest in particular is the diamondback moth, and it has been wreaking havoc all over New York. However, all is not lost; there still will be cabbage and lettuce in the grocery store. The reason for this? Scientists have come up with an effective new way to manage the diamondback moth, and it isn’t reliant on pesticides. It uses genes. But, best of all, it won’t be one farmer paying for one treatment. It will be a universal movement, and this movement has the possibility to revolutionize the crucifer, or, in more simple terms, the cabbage and lettuce market.

Blastocystis hominis (B hominis) is a common parasitic organism found throughout the world. An infection with B hominis is called blastocystosis. The parasite lives in your large intestine and can be found in stool. It can remain in the body for weeks, months, or years. It is not known whether the parasite B hominis causes any symptoms in humans or if the associated symptoms may be caused by infection with other parasitic organisms, bacteria, or viruses. Often, B hominis is found along with other organisms that are more likely to be the cause of your symptoms.

On the island of Flores, Indonesia, a skull was extracted from a cave in 2003. This cave was known as Liang Bua and the specimen became known as Liang Bua 1 (LB1). When researchers first discovered this skull, they thought it belonged to a young child about three or four years old because it was so small (Baab 2012). As days went on, more of the cranium and mandible became exposed and they determined this skull did not belong to a small child. Eventually, arm bones along with leg, feet, and wrist bones were discovered for LB1. LB1 was very short, approximately 3’6”, which was similar to the other specimens found on this island (Baab 2012). LB1 is the specimen for the species Homo floresiensis, also known as the “Hobbit” (Baab and McNulty 2009, Dennell and Roebroeks 2005, Van Heteren 2013). Due to lack of evidence, the evolution of Homo floresiensis remains very controversial. At the very beginning, it was thought that the morphology of LB1 was due to island evolution (Aiello 2010). The isolation from being on an island was considered to be the reasoning for the short stature and dwarf-like characteristics and that this species was a descendent of a large-bodied hominin (Baab and McNulty 2009). The morphology of the cranium and mandible has presented many different interpretations of the evolution of H. floresiensis. As of now, there are two competing hypotheses to possibly explain this evolution. Initial evidence shows that Homo floresiensis was a diseased

The most distinct of H. neanderthalensis is its unique cranial features. These features comprise of a large middle part of the face where their skull was more long and flat but had more of a protruding brow ridge. They also had slanting cheek bones and a large nose which is said to be for humidifying and warming cold, dry air. Their jaw and teeth are larger and have a hole called the retro molar space (behind wisdom teeth at the back of the

The results of our research found that over 95% of the DNA on purported bigfoot specimens returned as “Human.” NABS found this as an extremely puzzling result considering the “BIG” names in the Bigfoot world that consider themselves, researchers proclaimed that Bigfoot was a type of ape. Many of these “researchers” claimed that the DNA showing “human” was compromised or contaminated and the results should be disregarded. We saw this same discussion time after time, discount the results, they are wrong. Again, almost every moderately famous researcher known for investigating Bigfoot issues proclaimed the studies and results were flawed,

In the science of paleontology, the history of life is studied. Paleontologists study fossils to learn the past ecologies, evolution, and the origins of humans. In order to understand the processes that have led to both the origination and destruction of organisms since life began, paleontologists incorporate both scientific knowledge and studies. Fossil findings are critically important for confirming predictions of evolution theory. Of the many discoveries that are made yearly to add depth to the understanding of evolution, an example is a recent discovery of a creature they named Tiktaalik. The Tiktaalik was uncovered to be a transitional animal between shallow-water fishes and limbed animals. The creature supports the idea that it emerged from both mammals and reptiles, suggesting that the two are related. These findings support prediction of evolution, contradicting the belief that God

Floresiensis fossils to determine if they are of a human or non-human origin. Whereas the Evolutionary view takes the stance that “Hobbits” were non-human due to features such as: their canine like teeth, small stature and brains. Creationist carry the view that the species known as “Hobbits” were simply humans born with the condition microcephalic (a birth defect where a baby is born with an abnormally small head/cranial capacity) and impacted by dwarfism . Those who hold a young-Earth creation view hold this perspective, because there are several technical difficulties presented in the Revolutionaries conclusions. Such as, there is no definitive proof or way to trace other brain disfunctions besides microcephalic, Evolutionist determined that H. Floresiensis were “new human species” based off one skeleton skull, and there simply are not enough Hobbit fossils to hypothesis that they are not of the modern human

Hominids with a brain absolutely and relatively larger than that of the australopithecines appeared about 2.3 million years ago. These hominids are classified in our own genus: Homo. The earliest species to appear was the Homo Habilis. It was the first of our ancestors to show a significant increase in brain size and also the first to be found associated with stone tools. These characteristics resulted in this species’ placement into the human genus, Homo.