Hospice Aristotle

This article can be used as a way to further support my argument about how most patients don’t utilize all of the benefits that hospice has to offer. There are some cases where people choose not to receive spiritual support due to

The present-day misconception of palliative care possibly comes from the circumstance that palliative care was used interchangeably with hospice care until the 1980s. (Clark & Seymour, 1999). Clark and Seymour (1999) extensively write on the beginnings and evolution of palliative care. They describe the progression of palliative care as a whole and explain the movement from palliative starting out as supplemental care to terminal patients to the concept division of palliative and hospice care. They describe the differences in each and explain why palliative is its own concept that differentiates from hospice care. In 2002, the World Health Organization defined palliative care as “an approach” that increases the quality of life of

c. P) Since the good, according to Plato, is that which furthers a person’s real interests, it follows that in any given case when the good is known, men will seek it.

The first hospice was built in England during the 1960s by Cicely Saunders. The first hospice built in the United States was in 1971 and was called Hospice Inc. Florence Wald played a major part and was a leader of the hospice movement in the United States (Martinez, 2011). The movement towards hospice in the United States started because dying had moved home to hospitals and patients were not being able to participate in their death, their wishes were not being respected, and pain control was given little to none from their healthcare providers. Nursing services for hospice patients started off being on a voluntary basis. Two hospice patients a day were seen by each nurse. In 1978, 59 hospices were developed throughout the United States. By

In conclusion, in time of technological advancement hospice, appears to be the advancement of medicine. Hospice has gained recognition worldwide through the compassion and personal approach to patients with incurable diseases. Now with the ACA involvement we are to provide quality of care, patients do have the rights and hospice providers must review the notice of patient rights with patient/family/at the time of hospice admission and make sure they have received a copy of these rights as a patient. Most patient and families who are living with a life-threating illness can expect to experience multiple physical symptoms.

Hospice was established to allow patients with terminal illnesses to have a good death, regardless of whether the patient remains at home or is admitted to the hospital or a long term care facility. A good death consists of helping the patient prepare for the end of life, to help maintain all symptoms that come with an illness, and to be support to not only the patient but family also. Spirituality is provided, based on the patient’s belief system, and dignity to the patient as well (Granda-Cameron & Houldin, 2012).

According to the article by DiMartino at el. (2014), Cancer is considered the second leading cause of death in the United States and majority of patients that are diagnosed with cancer will die from these disease without receiving proper care, such as hospice. Some people in the United States and other places all over the world believe in a myth that says hospice speeds up a person’s death. But, without hospice patients may feel like they are a burden to their families and they would want to die sooner. However, through this research and six articles a reader can see that, “hospice provides extra time for the families and the patient to say their goodbyes, to seek out resolutions, and find the closure that the both parties need” (Connor et

When it comes to terminal illness, more people are turning to hospice care to be as comfortable as possible in their remaining time (Hospice Foundation of America, 2017). Many factors go into hospice care, also known as end of life care. Numerous services are offered to both they dying and their family (National Health Service, n.d.). Hospice care has shown to improve the quality of life for both the dying and their caregivers (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.). While many argue that hospice care can work for almost anyone, many cultural influences affect whether or not terminally ill patients opt for end of life care (Johnson, Kuchibhatla, & Tulsky, 2008).

SUMMARY: Paul J. van der Maas in the article, “Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Other Medical Practices Involving the End of Life in the Netherlands, 1990-1995”, published in the New England Journal of Medicine addresses the topic of the physician-assisted suicide and argues that euthanasia has not yet developed a concrete reason as to whether it should take place or not. Maas supports his claim first by the Toulmin model, second by logos, and finally by pathos. The author’s overall purpose is to explain that there is no concrete reason yet behind the need for euthanasia and proves that the majority of people agree with its existence, despite not having all the evidence of its effects. Maas exemplifies a stern tone in order to appeal

A little history into the practice of euthanasia, which started with the ancient Greeks, and is now something legal into few states today. According to Hosseini (2012), euthanasia is actually “a Greek word that literally means “happy death”” (p.203). Who doesn’t want to die a happy death, free of suffering and pain? The man we have to thank for human

“Death with Dignity,” I had thought, was one of those emotionally triggered cliches to which speakers run when they have not examined their subject very thoroughly or when somebody asks them a too thoughtful question. So too, I surmised, “Quality of Life” was an empty banality. Exposure to hospice care, however, raised simple questions which, I am now embarrassed to admit, I had not previously considered: “What do you mean by dignity?” and “Who decides what kind of quality?” An answer to the second question helps to answer the first. The patient and his family determine what is meaningful for them, what constitutes quality of life. Hospice caregivers believe strongly in the family’s right to determine how they will handle their problems and

Primarily, the hospice philosophy promoted that patients should participate and choose how the care is administered. Furthermore, patients culd even choose to stay at home, eat how they wanted, and receive pain medications when they pleased. Therefore, one could say commodification didn’t exist as this point. (Rose, p. 313). Secondly, the early philosophy turn its back on regimentation; whereas it favored integrating care into clients lives. In other words, it wanted patients to understand they will people, and not machines as hospitals at the time had made them seem. As a result, the overall philosophy was eliminating schedules of when visitors are allowed, types of foods, and what the patient can wear – giving patients the right to choose (Rose, p. 309).

In 1970 hospice care was introduce in United State, this was a care that is given to dying patient and family member to provided compassionate care during their end of life. While, According to get palliative care, Palliative care focuses on providing relief from the symptoms and stress of serious illness. The goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family. (Get Palliative care). The relationship between hospice and palliative care comes hands and hands to achieve best quality end of life. “palliative care does not have time limit, it’s start in diagnosis through the end of life”(Ihrig, 2009) we refer them to palliative care as as soon as we diagnose them with disease such as cancer or multi-organ failure. In addition,

Aristotle believes happiness is the purpose of life because, a human, when giving reasons and opinions to why they make the decisions between numerous choices, people will conclude to the same ideas, which is whatever choice allows that person to achieve the most happiness. Aristotle rightfully concludes that, the support of our decision making is that people will base their moral decisions off the amount of happiness they receive compared to the trouble of performing the action. The center of our decision-making must be a state of character within us, in this case, that weights our delights against our burdens. Aristotle also states finding balance is key, but hard to obtain. Anyone can become angered, gives or spends money, with the right motives, at the right time, the right person, but it is not for everyone, and he says it is not easy. He says goodness is altruistically hard to find. Thus, according to Aristotle, “It is difficult to live the virtuous life primarily because it is often difficult to find the proper mean between the extremes.”

Some factors as to whether or not a dying person will receive hospice care comes from if the patient is actually terminally ill and going to die in approximately 6 months or less, if the patient or family paying for the patient’s care has enough money since hospice is expensive and if there are even hospice care in the regions where the dying patient is. For instance of where availability is limited comes from the fact that hospice is more common in some areas like England and less common in areas like poor nations. The guiding principles for hospice care include that the patient has the right to make independent decisions that are then respected by hospice personnel involved, and the patient’s family and friends are taught how to care and