Hospital Accreditation : A Self Assessment Process

In the Middle East, Saudi Arabia is the largest arid country (Al-Ibrahim, 1991). The country covers some 80 percent of the Arabian Peninsula (Al-Hamzi, 1992). The area of Saudi Arabia is 2.25 million square kilometers, equivalent (1.4) million square miles (Batayneh, 2012). The total number population in Saudi Arabia is 25.7 million (Al-Shayaa et al., 2012). Saudi Arabia climate is broiling in the summer and chilly in the winter, and Saudi Arabia does not have well-defined season. In addition, Saudi Arabia is waterless country, and it does not have rivers or lakes (Al-Shayaa et al., 2012).

Oil has often been referred to as any economy’s lifeblood. Although this is an overemphasis, oil has been the key, nonhuman resource of the economy throughout the largest part of the 20th century. In the book “The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, And Power” by Daniel Yergin, the author illustrates the political, societal, economic, and geo-strategic importance of this product.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations or JCAHO was founded in 1951 as a private nonprofit organization that established guidelines for the running and management of hospitals and health care facilities in the United States. According to its website (n.d.), JCAHO’s primary mission is, “To continuously improve health care for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest

“While accreditation is technically a voluntary process, through which accrediting bodies like The Joint Commission visit a facility to perform quality and process checks, it is also relied upon by state agencies in all fifty states in lieu of specific state licensure requirements (Hay, n.d.).” All organizations must meet certain standards in order to even open its doors. It is very important for healthcare organizations to be accredited by someone. The Joint Commission is the most popular and well known. Facilities that are accredited by someone other than The Joint Commission many not give the highest care which leads to more readmissions costing more. “In a retrospective analysis at 24 accredited trauma centers in the United States, accreditation was significantly associated with higher survival rates for patients presenting with six types of trauma injuries (Alkhenizan,

The Performance measurement availability of the scope measurement to health care organization that includes a set of measures to provide hospitals with other accreditation programs.

The history of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals is a story of the health professions’ commitment to patient care of high quality in the 20th century. According to Dr. Ernest Codman, founder of the accreditation system, which would enable hospitals to track every patient it treat long enough to determine whether or not the treatment was effective. If not, the hospital would figure out how to prevent similar failures in the future (Roberts, Coale & Redman, 1987).

Aronovitz, L. G. (2007). Hospital Accreditation: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' Relationship with Its Affiliate: GAO-07-79. . U.S. Government Accountability Office.

The Joint Commission is an accrediting agency that evaluates the services provided by health institutions and recognize that after their assessments meet all requirements. This visit is requested by the institution and after being accredited are visited every three years. “The Joint Commission is working to align and improve how accreditation and certification work together to enhance their value to organizations” (Horn, 2012, p.243). It is a prestige by being accredited by the Joint Commission. The hospital institution is evaluated in all aspects evaluated from the triage is performed in the ER, permits, documentation, security, administration of drugs, surgical procedures, to infection control and other aspects that are related to the safety

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) core measures in relation to Heart Failure (HF) was examined using empirical-based nursing research. Findings suggest that lack of understanding by nurses contributes significantly to the privation of core measure implementation. A significant number of Americans suffer from HF, so patient quality of care assessment was necessitated. Identifying factors were: nurse-patient education resulting in follow-up appointments, left ventricular performance or left ventricular systolic (LVS) function, treatment medications, and smoking cessation programs. Nurses provide an important role in the education of patients with HF. The Nurse is integral in providing documentation in relation to LVS. Nurses play an important role in the administration of HF medication. Smoking, a major cause of HF, requires special nursing intervention. Nursing results in improved quality of care if HF core measures are implemented properly. Additionally, Orem’s universal requisites are fundamental in the nursing process.

Charles HaydenTatia Green, onlineMB208-ICD-1012/3/2015Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health CareIn 1979, a nonprofit organization was established to assist ambulatory health care organizations in improving the quality care provided to patients. This organization which some may know of is called Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. which: "Encourage and assist ambulatory health care organizations to provide the highest achievable level of care for recipients in the most efficient and economically sound manner. The AAAHC accomplishes this by the operation of a peer-based assessment, consultation, education and accreditation program." American College Health Association, Ambulatory Surgery Foundation, The American Group Practice Association, Group Health Association of America, Medical Group Management Association and the National Association of Community Health Centers are the six founding members of AAAHC. A few things that this association does are measure performance, provide consultation and education, review and revise standards. AAAHC accreditation means the organization participates in an ongoing self evaluation, peer review and education to continuously improve its care and services. Not only does this organization live up to its standards, but commits thorough onsite survey by AAAHC surveyors whom are also health care professionals. When surveying an organization, the AAAHC includes the following as listed: Patient RightsAre patients

The “Do Not Use” List was created to minimize medical errors. Mistakes were being made in relation to incorrect use of terminology. Before long, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), an independent organization that accredits and certifies more than 20,500 health care organizations and programs in the United States, introduced the list as a requirement in accredited organizations in 2004. It includes abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols that should no longer be used.

When an individual is seeking medical care they expect the highest quality of care. Accreditation of a facility or department is a way to obtain the confidence of a patient. When a facility does obtain accreditation they are officially being recognized as being qualified to perform studies that will yield diagnostic images as well as provide quality patient care. The department who hold the accreditation status will then be held to minimum standards and or requirements in order to maintain the status. Any facility or department seeking accreditation is eligible under the guidelines of the different accreditation agencies (Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC), 2015). On the other hand if a facility fails

When we think about the accreditation process, we think about the Joint Commission (“The Joint Commission”). The purpose of the Joint Commission is to constantly progress the health care for the community by means of assessing health care instituting while and motivating those institutions to outrival in making available secure and effectual care that is superior and has significance (“The Joint Commission”). In order to earn the accreditation

This economic modernization in the Middle East, could only be a short term success which does not guarantee the successful and stable economic development of oil rich states and the region as a whole in the long term. The Middle East, despite its vast reserves of oil, is still considered a developing region due to the high reliance on oil revenues and rather weak production sector of the economy as well as due to some political factors such as lack of democracy, corruption, reluctance to the reforms and other issues. There are various reasons as to why the Middle East is still considered a developing region despite its oil wealth. Natural resource revenues have also been linked to slow economic growth rates, inequality, and poverty. One culprit may be "Dutch disease," which was discussed earlier. Other factors may include the volatility associated with commodity prices, which can have especially negative impacts on weak-state economies; and the underdevelopment of agricultural and manufacturing sectors during boom periods in resource-based economies. And even when oil abundance produces high growth, it often benefits only a few corrupt elites rather than translating into higher living standards for most of the population. Corruption is one of the economic deficiencies which can weaken economic growth and development; thus it is considered as an important impediment to economic growth and political stability, particularly in developing countries. The dependence on a

Oil has repeatedly been referred to as any economy’s lifeblood. Whereas this is an overemphasis, oil has been the utmost key, nonhuman resource of economy throughout the largest part of the 20th century. In the book “The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, And Power” by Daniel Yergin, the author illustrates the political, societal, economic, and geo-strategic prominence of this product. The book was published by Simon and Schuster in 2011 in New York, and contains 928 pages, as its ISBN is 1439134839. This research paper aims to provide a book review on Daniel Yergin’s “The Prize.”