House Bill 60 Research Papers

Since the rise of mass shootings in schools and campus, states have been cracking down on guns and making stricter gun laws. After the Sandy Hook mass shooting in Connecticut, which left 20 children dead, the federal government failed to pass gun laws while states took their own actions and pass various laws. States like New York and Connecticut have been some of these states. There are already states that have passed that background checks are mandatory on all guns or handguns, and some of these states have made it mandatory for even unlicensed vendors and gun shows. This is a huge step for America as more states band together to impose stricter laws on firearms. In the past, states banding together to ban or legalize something has shown to influence the federal government or other states that have yet to follow. This has been proven with abortions and homosexual marriage and is now taking place with gun control. Gun control supporters have realized this and have started targeting their local governments to implement change

This paper will discuss the elements associated with the request to amend and to enact the revised code to authorize a person not otherwise authorized to do so to administer certain drugs pursuant to delegation by an advanced practice registered nurse who holds a certificate to prescribe. This act, also known as House Bill 96, was introduced on March 3, 2015. H. B 96 was amended into Senate Bill 110. The amended H.B. 96 now the Senate Bill 110- APRN Delegation of Drug Administration was introduced on March 3, 2015. The bill if passed would authorize certain advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to delegate to persons not otherwise authorized to administer drugs the authority to do so under specified conditions. Currently, Ohio law

Sandy Hook Elementary. Aurora, Colorado. San Bernardino, California. Las Vegas, Nevada. Orlando, Florida. (Words with Negative Connotation) These are just some of the biggest mass shootings that have swept America in the past few years. Hundreds of lives are lost each year to gun related violence in the United States alone. Gun control has been a topic in our country since our founding fathers adopted the second amendment to the US constitution. Although recently controversy has sparked to an all-new extent in America due to the recent spike in mass shootings and gun related homicides. So many families and loves ones are affected each year in the United States because of gun related violence and other mass killing events, because of these events gun control laws need to be revamped and strengthened in American in order to protect the citizens.

Only this month, 59 were killed and over 500 people were injured during a country music concert in Vegas in what is now known as the deadliest mass shooting in American history. Last year, 49 were killed and 58 were injured in a gay nightclub in Florida. In 2012, a mass shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School took 27 lives, 20 of them being first graders. The list of these unthinkable and stomach-churning acts is quickly turning endless, forcing us to rethink why we truly have the right to bear arms. Many defend the second amendment by claiming we need this right for self defense, which is the most wretched part.When we look at what we have lost compared to what we have earned in this fight to keep the right to bear arms, this privilege does not seem worth the sacrifice of so many lives. In today’s world, we do not defense through guns but from them. Our policymakers keep trying to reach a compromise by putting in place certain regulations. “Some states require would-be gun owners to fulfill a firearms safety course in order to obtain their license.” “Such training courses, however, even when not required, are very advisable for the would-be gun owner, as they ensure that he or she has all the necessary information on liability issues, on safety, and even on care and maintenance of the gun” ( How to Get a Gun License 1). This lack of attention illustrates that despite the multiple tragedies that have taken place in our nation, some states do not even require a simple safety course that ensures the safety of our people. Furthermore, it is required that one must pass a background check. The questions asked on the test are the following:

Laws regulating the use of guns in America have been a hot topic for years. Media coverage of mass shootings, acts of terrorism in and outside of the United States, and stories of families being murdered in the night has resulted in a desensitized, or perhaps, overly sensitized nation. People are scared and have centered their idea of safety on one of two main approaches: creating stricter gun laws so less crime occurs, or taking away gun restrictions so everyone can protect themselves against crime. Policies stemming from these vantage points begin by the agenda set by pertinent support and opposition groups, reflecting these approaches.

Concealed carry has been in news for a while now and is a hot topic. Concealed carry means more guns around us. Those who not paying attention might assume that open concealed carry is something new, something rare, perhaps reckless at best and dangerous at worst, but that is far from the truth. The Daily Caller newspaper states that, “concealed carry is currently legal in 44 states, and in 30 states you don’t need a license to openly carry a holstered pistol.” The norm states that one had to be licensed to hide the licensed gun. Over the years various restrictive gun laws have been created state by state, largely in an effort to suppress the ability of minorities and criminals to carry guns. The ability to lawfully carry a hidden gun became

“The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms” (Adams). Samuel Adams said this while forming the Constitution, in order to protect United States citizens. The United States of America is one of the few nations that allow citizens to own a weapon. The recent mass murders in public centers have increased the fear of guns amongst the citizens. Guns are now stigmatized after the several mass murder incidents from the movie theater in Colorado, to schools and universities in Texas and Virginia. Due to the gun-related homicides, the government implemented strict regulations for owning a gun. This has made the government enforce more stringent regulations in guns, especially automatic rifles. New gun laws have banned the ownership of automatic rifles and magazines with high capacity. Also, the government has taken away the freedom to carry handguns from citizens without a proper license in most states. Now, in order to carry a gun, either by open carry or concealed carry, the citizens need to apply for a gun-carrying permit. California is one of the very few states with extraneous gun laws, and the Los Angeles County has some of the strictest concealed carry gun regulations. Because of personal safety, and the Second Amendment, Los Angeles should allow every resident the opportunity to apply for a concealed weapon

Gun law reform remains a sensitive grey area for the United States. This is one of many reasons why gun law reform has been proposed but never makes much headway. It is difficult to protect citizens while also protecting such an important piece of history and heritage. For now, it appears there is no resolution in the near

Indiana has approved House Bill 1337 which protects fetuses from being aborted once they are diagnosed with Down Syndrome inside the womb.

The next issue called into question is the fact that this law requires all who own them to register their “assault weapons”. This can be an issue of privacy and can also predispose police officers into thinking that these citizens may be criminals just because they own assault weapons.

just ignore bans. The only two things passing a law of this nature would accomplish

There are a lot of people who have had a huge problem with this law. It is easy to understand why some people can get fed up with it at points. Guns can really hurt and affect a lot of families, but without these weapons we wouldn’t be an independent country and would still have to believe in the Church of England and would not able to call ourselves free people and make our own decisions. This country was built the way it was because of firearms, which is why it would be disrespectful to the people who fought and died for us, to rewrite the constitution they fought for. Everyone in the United States wouldn’t be sitting where we are today, and would be controlled by a different nation if it weren’t for them in the 1700’s, sticking up for the rights they believed in. “Throughout the course of the war, an estimated 6,800 Americans were killed in action, 6,100 wounded, and upwards of 20,000 were taken prisoner.” (civilwar.org) The people who fought for us had to endure so much and for us just to ban one of the main reasons why the United States is an independent and free country wouldn’t be fair to the people who risk their lives for us. All and all, if people are using firearms for the right reason there should be no choice but to leave the amendment. We are honoring America and all the people who sacrificed for us to be here, this is not to say that guns are safe, if they are in

“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American

Over the past five years, lawmakers have initiated more than 100 gun control proposals in Congress, since Gifford’s and 18 other people were shot in Tucson, Arizona in January 2011. Not one of them has been passed. Very of these proposals made it to the Senate. The Senate is set to vote on four more. The Democratic Party has proposed two. The first would be to ban any suspected terrorists from being able to purchase a gun. The second proposal would be to expand background checks. Time and time again the nation has witnessed moments of silence for victims of terror that has been caused by gun violence. More often than not those moments are followed by months of silence due to inaction which is clearly inexcusable.

There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws infringe on our constitutional