preview

How A Partnership Relationship Exists Between Shelby And Three Winners

Better Essays

Introduction In order to advise Shelby and Carla of potential liabilities, it is necessary to examine whether a partnership relationship exists between Shelby and Three Winners (TW), and the conduct between Carla and Tony. If they are determined to be partners, what is the potential liabilities of Shelby and would it be liable for Lord Porchy and Tony’s debts. Moreover, any potential liabilities and consequences Carla may face on with her conduct. (a) Advise Shelby on her potential liability as well as any potential remedies she may have available to her As Partnership Act 1982 NSW s1 stated that there are four essential elements which are required partnership to exists, which are business, carrying on, in common and with a view of …show more content…

She could look at the books, discuss training strategy and share in profits and losses to the extent 10%. Which is carry on business in common with a profit. The loan agreement does not state that the 10% share of profits and losses is a payment of debt, which means Shelby is sharing profits and liable for losses. This met the rights of partner to receive profits, liability to share in losses, and the rights to control the property. In fact, Shelby cannot participate in the day to day management and binding the legally decisions of business and only can discuss the strategy with May Whaterhome, which was a conduct concerning the protection of the value of her investments. This can be argued that the financial funds is a single adventure, it is a joint venture between Shelby and TW. However, the advance of Shelby is more likely profit sharing rather than product sharing. Therefore, the advance by Shelby was a loan and in fact the loan agreement confer rights on her that are consistent with the type of a dormant limited partner rather than a creditor of TW. In considered the conduct of James, he agreed with Lord Porchy to purchase the new horse Super Fast Runner (SFR) without at least two of the partner signed. James acted in breach of the partnership agreement which they established at the beginning of business. As Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v

Get Access