How Barbaric Were The Barbarians Research Paper

Positively, the Mongols were great conquerors and they respected each other, negatively, they brutally harmed people and valuables in the process. Charles J. Halperin wonderfully stated, “The Mongol Empire made significant contributions to the political institutions, economic development, and cultural diversity of many lands. No history of the Mongol Empire dwells only on Mongol destruction, can be satisfactory” (Doc 6). The history of the Mongols can’t only be about the negativity that they caused to society as the Mongols had a more positive impact rather than a negative impact. The Mongols created a vast empire throughout Eurasia, but it wasn’t worth killing over 5 million people in the process. In the end, as a result of the vast empire, they weren’t able to control it. Eventually, the Mongol empire and became a part of the society in the area and vanished

Throughout the 13th century world, the Mongols constantly showed displays of continuous violence, drinking, brutality and unfair treatment. They were considered to be savages, and people who lived far beyond what we would know as a “civilized world.” They single handedly became one of, if not the most powerful empires to have existed, building their empire through violent and barbaric manors. The Mongols were very barbaric people, for they portrayed many inhumane and mannerless actions while their empire lasted, causing death destruction and the downfall of all of the land they took over.

The world has viewed the Mongols as destructive barbarians; however, the Mongols viewed themselves as soldiers. The perception of themselves is important because they did not believe it was destructive to unite a world empire. They believed that because they were soldiers, anyone in their path could be taken down by force. The nations that defined Mongols as destructive are the same people that resisted joining their empire. The Mongol’s obsession with power, dedication to their leader, and their need to possess land is why I believe they should not be remembered as destructive barbarians. Instead, I think they should be known as the empire that failed to unite the world.

The Mongols were very harsh and brutal like no one else in their era but I believe that they are not barbarians. The Mongols had a strong dominating military that was almost always successful, they contributed to many of the ideas that are still around today, and made a very stern set of laws that kept their community civilized which is why I believe that the Mongols were not barbarians.

One reason that the Mongols were not barbaric was because within their civilization, the Mongols cared about and protected their people. There is many pieces of evidence that support this statement. One of them is when the text says, “The town is surrounded by a mud wall and has four gates.” (Document E) Providing their people with a wall and gates helped keep the people safe. This shows that they wanted to protect their people and were kind, caring people. As said in the first paragraph, a

1.The word “barbarian” that we use today was a way of categorizing humans back in the Roman Empire ages.

think.The way i look at the barbarians they weren’t barbaric at all. The important reason

The Mongols, a small tribe 800 years ago expanded and conquered a lot of Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The Mongols are known for being ruthless warriors and having a negative reputation, being called “Barbarians”. They were in fact Barbaric, but how Barbaric were the Mongols really? The Mongols were extremely barbaric and were unmerciful. The Mongols caused so much destruction, caused many deaths and ruined people's lives, and not to mention how inhuman, savage and evil they were.

They plan out there battles, often using the encircling tactic. Men of other citizenships meet the enemy head on while the Mongols send the strongest fighters to the blind spots of the opponent. The men on horseback give the illusion of a great mass of men, inducing fear into the army facing them. Through this, they reduce fortresses to rubble (Document 3). As the army is based out of the number ten, if a handful run away during battle, while the others stay and fight, then they are slaughtered. Furthermore, if five men go to fight and the others remain behind, those who stayed are slaughtered. If ten men flee, then the others who did not go with them are executed for not leaving. If one man is captured of the ten, the others are killed for not saving him (Document 2). These rules and strategy created a strong, well regulated, and reliable

I believe the mongols were barbaric and don’t deserve to have the scale tip in their favor. In the first slide it says the streets were filled with human flesh and fat, from women, children, and adults regardless if they were a combatant or not. Another example would be the city of Riazan, it was razed to the ground and it’s inhabitants were all massacred, only a few were left alive to spread the message. It’s widely known that if you refused to surrender then the whole city would be massacred and raised to the ground.

The Mongols were a small tribe from the grasslands of Central Asia. They conquered a lot of the known world. It has been debated whether the Mongol’s are barbaric or not, or how barbaric they really are. The Mongol’s are barbaric because they conquered more land than any other conquerors, had brutal army strategies, and immoral laws. The Mongols conquered more land than any other conquerors.

William Bradford even referred to them as “these savage barbarians” and intimated that the natives were “wild men” just like the “wild beasts” that occupied the “hideous & desolate wilderness” to which he gave the Lord credit for redeeming them from their oppressors the natives

How do you interpret the word “Barbarian”? The word barbarian was used to describe the ruthless Mongols during the thirteenth century and is meant to be a demeaning term. The Mongols were a small tribe from Central Asia who expanded their territory by war. The Mongols were very barbaric people. They showed barbarian traits by the way they lived, how they fought, and the rules they had.

The definition of barbaric is “savagely cruel”, and when you take a look at the Mongols history of punishments and warfare, you can certainly call it barbaric. They often tore through civilizations, killing innocent people as a method of taking control. Genghis Khan,

When most people hear the word “Barbarian” they often think about the negative things that barbarians have done instead of the positive things that barbarians have done. It is stated in the section titled “Were the Barbarians a Negative or Positive Factor,”