How Can Bag Ban Bad For People And Environment

As a consumer, there is a general expectation to receive a bag to transport goods we purchase. To prevent further harmful environmental effects, some cities have placed a ban on single-use plastic bags. Some argue banning single-use plastic bags would be more harmful to the environment than helpful. The efforts in banning single-use plastic bags can be unavailing when there are many other factors harming the environment. However, single-use plastic bags have a short utilization time by consumers and have hundreds of years left on their lifespan that will be spent contaminating the environment, endangering animals, and negatively affecting our health. The single-use plastic bag ban would be a small but attainable step to effectively respect and protect our environment to the best of our ability.

“…have no right to transgress the law which gives to the workers the right of self-organization and collective bargaining”

The national government put in place the 5p Plastic bag charge, to try to and improve human health. This law has been very beneficial for human health. It is known that plastic bags take over 500 years to break down in landfills and as a result of that these landfills can cause air pollution and land pollution, which can effect individual’s repository system and other illnesses. By having this law in place landfills are not filled up with so much plastic bag rubbish and as a result can be helping improve human health. More reusable bags.

Bags the bane of the sea rhetorical analysis on Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment.”

The central government appraised this act claiming that it was a conservative measure. This is seen as a matter of self-importance and not a conservative measure. It is an invasion of the free market. However, it claims that the measure would help solve littering issues without thinking of the negative consequences (Charles, 70). They include the need of buying more plastic bags by car owners who mainly use plastic bags as rubbish can linings. Hence, the ban makes the consumers buy additional plastic garbage bags. Also, there is a chance that expenditure on recyclable bags will increase. The state should protect businesses and consumers from the unfair interference on their economic freedom. The general public was not given a chance to air its views on the matter before it was enacted. Hence, most of the decisions should be made by the local governments. The reason is that these officials are more answerable to the

Each year there is an increase in demands for plastic bags, and therefore more are shipped, creating further environmental pollution concerns. This increase in demand has lead to the phenomenal upsurge in the use and misuse of plastic bags globally, both in developed and developing countries. Statistics show that 4 to 5 trillion plastic bags are produced per annum, whereby North America and Western Europe account for nearly 80% (Geographical, 2005; Reusable Bags, 2005). Cheeseman (2007) states that approximately “380 billion plastic shopping bags are used in the United States annually”; in turn, only 0.6% of this is recycled.

In the argumentative essay “Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment”, produced by the author Adam B. Summers, it narrowly focuses on the topic of the banning of plastic bags. The author illustrates the ban is bad can affect society in many ways. Adam provides the information through various amounts of stylistic elements, tools, word choice and so on

Due to the proximal ban of plastic bags in California, Adam B. Summers argues the reasons why they should not be banned in his article, “Bag Ban Bad for Freedom and Environment”. In order to build his argument, Summers includes an effective use of factual data and evidence, relating to the audience, and appealing to the audience’s emotion.

Australians approximately use 6.9 billion plastic bags per year (Errata Nolan ITU, 2002). The high consumption of plastic bags highlights one outstanding issue. The adverse impact, consumption and disposal of plastic bags have towards the environment. This involves the resources used to make

As the United States deals with the overwhelming amounts of waste building up, Nitin et al explain that “plastics take anywhere from 15 to 1000 years to biodegrade” once they are discarded (Nitin). Changes in recycling methods can no longer keep up with the exorbitant amount of waste produced in the United States. This is why some states choose to take their initiative one step further by placing either fees or a ban on the use of plastic bags. Due to the enormous waste the United States produces on a daily basis and the negative outcomes of this trash including adverse health effects, harmful impacts on nature, and the exponential piling of trash in landfills, the US government should ban plastic bags.

“The free movement of persons is one of the four fundamental freedoms of the internal market. The instant case raises a number of issues pertaining to the rights of free movement and limitations upon those rights.”1

Many other places around the world have either decided to charge a fee for plastic bags or ban them entirely, but what’s the better option? Is it ethical for businesses in California to charge citizens for plastic bags to fund government environmental projects? Well plastic bags are an ethical issue because it’s a problem in the world where a person and an organization can or one has to choose a position. This can then be evaluated if it is either ethical or unethical. Yes, this issue has been damaging to someone and to some groups, mostly those who help protect the environment, see plastic bags cause harm to the environment endangering those animals that live in it.

Plastic bags cause a massive amount of pollution to the earth. It lets out lots of CO2 into the air with the production of it. CO2 is a greenhouse gas that if let out too much at one time can hurt the planet. Not only do plastic bags produce pollution while being made, but also when they are decomposing. Plastic bags go on to last for up to 10-1000 years. That is possibly 1000 years that a plastic bag goes on to add the huge amount of trash in the world. Although plastic bags take so long to decompose they do eventually break down. Exposure to a lot of sunlight and wind will also speed up the process of the decomposition of plastic bags. The breaking down of plastic bags seems like a good thing, however it is the complete opposite. Plastic bags are broken down into microscopic particles that are toxic. Those toxic particles then go on to hurt the environment. An articles states, “They break down into tiny toxic particles that contaminate the soil and waterways and enter the food chain when animals accidentally ingest them.”. This goes to show that those

Using these plastic bags are increasing the dangers of thing that are happening in the world.

Five hundred billion used globally and one hundred billion of them end up in U.S. landfills, taking about one thousand years to decompose, but only 5.2 percent were recycled (Borrud, 2007, p.75).-These are the figures plastic bags have produced every year. Human beings invented plastic bags for the convenience of carriers and packers. However, just as other great inventions, say, nuclear energy and biotechnology, plastic bags are causing serious issues like global warming, environment pollution and energy consumption. They are gradually becoming sword towards ourselves. In responding to this problem, the city of San Francisco has become the trail blazer to prohibit non-biodegradable plastic bags in its large supermarkets and pharmacies.