How Can I Buy You? Essay

We have the capabilities to decrease this suffering and pain nevertheless, we disregard the problem and do nothing at all, which can be immoral. We should modify our opinions of morality so as to develop a dedication to helping people in terrible need.

People in society have been through some kind of distress and suffering once in their lives and it allows for the creation of the drive to help others in their time of difficulty. Hardships are experienced by many in society and cause people to relate to others who encountered similar misfortunes. These understandings bring forth a sense of unity that allows people to produce a sense of compassion to assist others in desperate

The example that affected me the most was when there was a homeless man walking across the street towards a mother and child. Due to instinct, the mother held the carriage closer and harder. To ensure the safety of her and her child, she gave him money. It was not that she felt compassion for him, but instead, she thought that this would keep him from harming herself and her child. It was not that the man acted in any unacceptable way, but that the woman and child were the ones at risk. The author shows compassion as more of a transaction as “the man stands and stares.” The fixed stare made her feel uneasy and nervous. It is as if time stopped. it was not a genuine act of kindness on the mother’s part or that she felt sympathetic for him. There is symbolism of protection “[when the mother] passes a folded dollar over her child’s head.” The man “does not know that acceptance of the gift and gratitude are what make this transaction complete.” It is visible that the woman only offers to help the man out of

People tend to brush off something or ignore something that we do not understand or like. Many Americans do this. So if most of America does this, then what gets done with that problem? Nothing! Barbara Lazear Ascher’s ‘On Compassion’ shows this to a new level. She shows us how the homeless is struggling and everyone turns their heads about it even though it is a big problem in New York City. Ascher’s use of good logos, pathos, and ethos comes together to show people what we are all guilty of at some point in our life. She shows us how the person 's reaction of a homeless person is to how the homeless person reacts to them.

Where we are is the grand culmination of hundreds of years of cooperating as a species to make for a grander environment that appeals to “all.” Despite our constant effort to improve the quality of life on earth, however, an increasingly tremendous problem pertaining the same subject has been growing “right below our noses”: homelessness. We, the common people, typically place those in such plight into great disregard; push them not off the streets but to the far back of our heads. In the article “On Compassion”, former NEW YORK TIMES columnist, Barbara Ascher, teaches us the ignorance of our denial and the importance of the helpless’ presence, and she does this through the heavy use of contrast, figurative language, a good quantity of rhetorical questions, and some very clever wording. She suggested that the presence of the homeless helps teach us compassion. Afterall, “compassion is not a character trait like a sunny disposition. It must be learned.”

Every time I walk out of a store and see the people who collect donations outside the stores I always ignore them. The reason I ignore them is because I don’t carry spare change. Another reason is that, I don’t want to tell them that I don’t have change because I feel that they might think I’m lying, that I don’t want to give them money. I sometimes do it too, when I see a homeless person in the street. I always give them a dollar or two, when I don’t have spare change I got no other choice but to pass by and ignore them. It feels bad ignoring them but there’s times where you can’t do anything about it. This is an example of bad faith because I’m avoiding these people, but not because I want to,

Jeanna Bryner, the managing editor of Live Science relinquished an article called “Human Suffering: Why We Care (or Don’t)” in order to explicate the different factors that affect our decisions in availing or not. One of the fascinating reasons mentioned was “To make any difference in Darfur… a person would have to make a much longer-term commitment that could be quite taxing, physically and monetarily.”(par. 17). Bryner expounded that in order to avail others, we need to give up an abundance of time in our lives, and not everyone can do that. Availing others can additionally be hazardous, for example, if we wanted to avail people in Darfur who are under a perpetual genocide, we might have to peregrinate there and there’s an immensely colossal chance of losing our lives. A plethora of times it is physically arduous to avail others. To us the benefit of staying home with our families and having a stable life largely affects our decision of availing others. All those societal factors make us act nonchalant to human suffering, but they are not the only reasons to why we act the way we do.

Indifference to the suffering of others keeps humanity divided. As Elie Wiesel said in “The Perils of Indifference”, “[Indifference] benefits the aggressor -- never his victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten” (2). When one sees a victim suffering, one may be indifferent to the victim’s sufferings. This diminishes the hope that the victim once saw and had, because without anyone showing concern for their sufferings, victims can believe that even their own humanity has betrayed them. This in turn creates a lack of trust among

The world is seen through many eyes and in different ways. No one sees everything the same because our experiences are different. Our experiences make us who we are. Who we are changes many things in perspective how we see things. In “On Compassion” by Barbara Ascher and “On Dumpster Diving” by Lars Eighner, their different perspectives show different sides and situations.

The comparison between rich and poor people is a topic with an enormous gap. The bridge between the two is longer than most see it, and is increasing steadily. Michael Sandel wrote a book discussing his opposition to the market society in the United States. The focus of Sandel’s book lies within the title, What Money Can’t Buy. He believes that everything seems to be for sale and that we are a society that revolves around the idea of every person for themselves. Sandel also states that inequality is rising faster than ever. Even though everything is for sale in this day and age, that does not mean everyone is able to purchase whatever they want. Inequality comes in many forms like race, gender and age. Income inequality affects

In the world, it is so easy to walk past an individual that is in distress without even knowing that there is something wrong. People notice something and expect the individual in front of or behind them to assist the distressed, and it happens more than often. For example, driving past an individual that is stranded on the side of the road is so simple. It is much easier to drive past than assist, especially when driving on a city street. Many people think about helping, and want to help, but they just do not.

All over the world, people are suffering. Heinous crimes are being imposed upon them. These millions of innocent people are having their basic human rights stolen from them. They are snatched from their homes, families, and communities. The things they lose in the process of these injustices are greater than what most people could ever fathom. Many turn their backs on these innocent lives, they say it is not their battle to fight. However, they should be asked, “What is worth the risk of losing countless human lives?” These people do not realize that by ignoring dehumanization, they are essentially saying it is alright that these people suffer. Instead of doing nothing and pretending these issues don't exist; they should be addressed openly and help should be offered. While the privileged sit back in their homes, others suffer mercilessly at the hands of murderers, traffickers, and more. Unfortunately, the majority of these cases goes unreported as it is hard to collect information from everyone having these injustices done to them. Dehumanization can happen to anyone; the effects it has on the mind and body are detrimental and can

     The depression was an era of extremes. A person was more than likely extremely poor, or in the lucky upper 1% that was extremely wealthy. The middle class was virtually not existent. All of these income groups, including those characterized in our three stories, wanted money because it supposedly brought happiness, but were actually struggling to cling to the intangible, unreachable feeling of love.

The subject of this paper is the age-old question, “Does Money Buy Happiness”. On the surface, this question appears to be an easy one. Happiness however, is a subjective item. To better answer this, several points must be analyzed such as, “What is happiness?”, “How is it measured?” etc. To better streamline this process, a research question was developed:

Fichter, K (2003). E-Commerce Sorting Out the Environmental Consequences . retrieved January 23 2014, from engineering.dartmouth.edu Web Site: http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/~d30345d/courses/IE-at-UNG/eCommerceConsequences.pdf