How Could One Not Feel Guilty When Looking Into A Test

For many years, the field of science has used animals in medical experiments worldwide, because of this innocent animals are being killed everyday. They are being tested with new drugs, new treatments, and by many makeup companies. Connecticut recently celebrated the passage of the “Beagle Freedom Law”, a law that requires laboratories to work with charities and rescue groups to find homes for research cats and dogs. Animals are being tested so humans do not have to be but animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings, although animals are the closest thing to humans. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of innocent animal subjects. Over 100 million animals suffer a year from testing. Testing animals is a lot more expensive than alternative methods and it is wasting government research dollars. Animal testing is not only a bad idea, but it is also inhuman and it should not be tolerated. The FDA should stop allowing animal testing. An animal does not give out the same results on a test than a human would.

Animals have successfully been used to understand biological processes, assess safety of different chemicals, develop vaccines and antibiotics, produce treatments for hepatitis C, rheumatoid arthritis, polio, diabetes and many more . However, it is impossible to know if the use of animals was required to acquire this research or if the amount of suffering and death could have been reduced or avoided in order to achieve the same results. It is well established that animals have been invaluable in the pursuit of biomedical research, and the benefits from using animals currently means that eliminating animal research is also immoral. This is because the benefits received from some research greatly outweigh the potential costs to the animals and it would be unjust not to perform such experiments. Consequently, animal research should not be fully banned due to the benefits it yields, but should be more heavily regulated to reduce the moral costs.

A paper by researchers at Yale University titled “Where is the Evidence that Animal Research Benefits Humans?” looks at various studies in which animals were used and shows that there is a small amount of evidence proving that these tests were directly beneficial to humans. In animal testing, human diseases and toxicity symptoms are mimicked in the animal, and the results of the test are often not similar in humans and animals (Stokes).The Food and Drug Administration reported that over ninety percent of products deemed to be safe for animals failed the test when given to humans. Many prescription drugs, such as Oraflex, Suprol, and Selacryn, are intensely tested on animals, and once they are distributed for human use, the results are not the same, causing sickness or death (PETA). For example, in 2004, a drug called Vioxx, intended to help with arthritis, was tested to be safe on animals, yet when brought up for people to use, it caused over sixty thousand deaths in the United States alone. Animals are not humans; therefore, they are not made up in the same way as humans are. Although we share many of the same functions as animals, our genes, cells, and tissues differ (Stokes). If one were to take a human gene and insert it into a rat, the gene would function completely differently in the rat’s body, just as a chemical would function completely differently in a human or rat. A quote from Pandora Pound, a British medical journal states, “The claim that animal

It is estimated that each year over 100 million animals in the United States are used for animal testing (ProCon.org, 2017). This is unlikely an underestimate as it is impossible to receive a correct count worldwide. Thousands of animals are to be euthanized from the complications they endure from testing. Animals are used to test scientific developments and commercial products. New medical and non-medical experiments are tested on animals to verify the harmfulness of new medications or the safety of a product that will be used on humans. Although the importance of animal testing brings more medical advancement over the years using fewer humans in experiments, it is still an expensive way of researching inaccurate results and at the same time, it is a practice of animal cruelty.

Animal Experimentation has been dated as far back as to the Early Greek Era. This practice has been viewed as ethical by research scientists trying to find new medical breakthroughs. Yet, in recent years, the use of animals in research and experimentation has been frowned upon by animal protection groups and animal rights activists. Animals are protected by certain guidelines and ethics prior to their use in research. Contrary to popular belief, animal experimentation should be viewed on a positive note, due to the fact that it can benefit human life, reduce adverse effects on humans, and the cost is cheaper and easier.

It is unethical to use the cruel methods of animal experimentation for our own benefit alone. The animals used in research range from birds, dogs, cats, and pigs to name a few. So many innocent creatures put up with the immense pain so that science experiments can be made and new products can be put on the shelves. Many of the animals used in the testing and experiments are blind,

Mohandas K. Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. What, then, does it say about the people of the United States, for allowing the deaths of millions of innocent animals for the benefit of research, that in most cases is not even useful? 100 million animals are killed each year due to animal testing or experimentation (PETA,1). In the past, it was acceptable to use animal testing for scientific research, but now that there are other viable alternatives to the testing of innocent animals, such as in-vitro, stem cell testing, non-incasing imaging techniques, and micro-dosing. Animal testing should only be used in cases where said drug or treatment will treat life-threatening diseases. Animal testing in this day and age is both unnecessary and cruel, as there are multiple alternatives and the most of the time is not useful in human research.

Although many people believe animal testing is good and can benefit humans, conversely the use of animals is seen by many in the medical field as necessary. While it is not ideal to cause harm to animals it is a safer way to test new products compared to testing them on humans. Animal testing is cruel and hurts innocent animals each day, the results of tests are not always successful, scientists should invest their money on other things that can make their tests more accurate and usable. Using animals as research experiments fail 94% of the time when tested on humans. The tests are not reliable. According to

There are many things that differ between humans and animals like “penicillin kills guinea pigs but is inactive in rabbits; aspirin kills cats and causes birth defects in rats, mice, guinea pigs, dogs, and monkeys; and morphine, a depressant in humans, stimulates goats, cats, and horses. Further, animals in laboratories typically display behavior indicating extreme psychological distress, and experimenters acknowledge that the use of these stressed-out animals jeopardizes the validity of the data produced.” Way too many lives are wasted because of this ineffective way to test. Animal testing isn’t accurate and will hurt the population. Many people that are testing the promising product are ending up dead or severally injured. This shows many people are risking their lives because animals and humans are completely different. Many people end up severely damaged because of these inaccurate tests. By testing on humans, the public becomes less and less likely to believe that scientists will ever find a cure. Inaccurate testing will lead to terrible results and negatively impacts both the human and animal

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

Every year, millions of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. Animals in laboratories all over the world live lives of deprivation, pain, isolation, and torture. Even though vast studies show that animal experimentation often lacks validity, leading to harmful human reactions, we still continue to use this method of experimentation, while many other less-expensive and more beneficial alternatives exist. Going beyond the issue of animal experimentation being morally wrong, this form of research is also hindering medical progress. Although the use of animals in laboratories is said to be necessary for the welfare and health of humans, people mistakenly believe that this immoral and unscientific method of experimentation is

Did you know that sixty percent of all animals in laboratories are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing? Everyone has a different view of animals; many people see animals as companions and others see animals for advancing medical or experimental research. Whichever way someone looks at an animal, the fact is that animals are being experimented on by research facilities everywhere. Although humans sometimes benefit from animal research, the pain the animals endure is unnecessary. Animals being used in research or to test the safety of products is wrong, but there are arguments for both sides. The first argument is what the animals in laboratories suffer from.

The utilization of animals in the field of both scientific and medical research has prompted several arguments and debates in the course of recent years throughout the world. Using animals for research has been a typical angle as few out of every odd research can be attempted on people because of ‘moral’ and ‘ethical’ purposes. The fact that only human beings have rights claims that animals ought to have rights as well. Another contention guarantees that people are the main ones who can act ethically and hence cannot be inquired about or tested upon. With this arises the question of whether it is ‘justified for us to do things to animals that we would consider unethical if we did

“Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are like us.’ Ask the experimenters why it is morally OK to experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are not like us.’ Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction”, said Professor Charles R. Magel. For centuries, animals have been used to help develop new medicines and to test the safety of various products. People have different views of animals; most look at animals as pets while other view animals as an advancement to furthering research. No matter what the individual perceives about animals, the reality is the same because animals are being take advantage of by research and cosmetic facilities across the world. A significant percentage of people do not realize what is happening to animals every day in laboratories; animals are suffering from the hand of humans. Even though people do get benefits from animal experimentation, but at the cost of animals going through torment and being slaughtered. The human benefits do not out weight the value of the animals’ life. For this reason, animals should no longer be a part of experiments of any kind.

Did you know that our of the 767.622 animals used in research and experimentation forty percent undergo cruel and unethical experiments? That is almost half of all the animals used in experimentation. Some animal researchers claim that the animals they are experimenting on are dealt with ethically. But the statistics show otherwise. Over the past year, 100 million animals have died during these experimentations. Including monkeys, birds, fish, dogs, cats, hamsters, frogs, mice, rats, guinea pigs, and much more that have not been mentioned. Based on these facts, it can said that even though animal experimentation has helped further some medical research and knowledge, we should not depend on it because it is inhumane, unethical, and unreliable.