How Did Andrew Jackson Abuse His Power

There are many who are against Andrew Jackson because he is a hypocrite. An example of this is how Jackson states he is against slavery but still owned slaves. One has to understand that America was founded on hypocrisy. Essentially what Jackson is trying to do is to make compromises on situations so he can support both sides of an argument to represent as many people as possible.

According to his enemies, Andrew Jackson behaved more like a dictator/king than a democratic president. Jackson and his followers became the basis of the Democratic-Republican party, later known as the Democratic party. He believed in the spoils system, supported the common man, and equality for all people regardless of their social class. Although he had such positive features, he had some negatives as well. Jackson removed Native Americans from their homeland by signing the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which created the “Trail of Tears,” vetoed the National Bank (B.U.S), and was pro-slavery. Although a common man himself, Jackson became successful as president. This was one of his biggest motives to support the common man, rather than the

This quote by Jackson underlies the fact the he was a selfish, tyrannical ruler. He did not make decisions based on the interests of the whole nation but on his own personal benefit, in search of self- achievement. Although he was portrayed or possibly manipulated the citizens to believe that he was a president for the common man, that was simply not the way he acted. As president, he purposely ignored the power of the Judicial branch to judge laws, and strengthened the power of the Executive branch above the limits in the Constitution. He was also said to be rude and uneducated, which

President Jackson acted undemocratically because of his actions against the national bank. On July 10th, 1832, Jackson sent a bank veto message to congress. The message was sent to remove the US National Bank because it was only helpful for a wealthier class for things like investments. Citizens from wealthier classes were outraged by Jackson’s actions. Former senator Daniel Webster replied to Jackson message saying, “It manifestly seeks to

Jackson resented banks because he was a man who came from a family of poor farmers who paid with goods and crops. He saw banks as only useful to the wealthy, so when Henry Clay proposed “The Bank Bill”, which was in favor of the recharter, Jackson vetoed it. Andrew Jackson only thought about himself, and people who were like him, poor farmers. In total, vetoed twelve bills during his presidency, which was more than all of the preceding presidents combined. Again, Jackson set his mind to do something, and it was done.

It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king because of several different reasons. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he refused to listen to others who told him differently. Document 6 stated that Andrew Jackson's vice president Van Buren warned Andrew Jackson about Swartwout, but Andrew Jackson didn't listen and hired him anyway. Andrew Jackson gave jobs to his friends like Swartwout who then went and stole $1 million dollars, which was the biggest theft in USA history. This reason showed he acted like a king because he didn't listen to president Van Buren who warned him about Swartwout, and he gave jobs to his friends. Another reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he owned

Jackson was more like a king for lots of reasons. Like the Nullification Crisis &

When Andrew Jackson decided to make his veto message regarding the Bank of The United States on July 10, 1832 one thing was on his mind: killing the Bank of The United States forever! This one event was the fuel Jackson used for his reconstruction of the U.S. It all started to unravel during his election of 1828. Several different "sects" within the different states were teaming up with one another to form a coalition of discontent for the President and his reconstruction. Like Thomas Jefferson before him, Andrew Jackson was a tried-and-true defender of American freedom committed to nothing so much as breaking the knot of political corruption and restoring integrity to republican institutions.

Jackson’s administration seemed changeable when it came to handling state governments. In the case of the Native American tribes in the South who were under threat of removal from their homes, he insisted that it was not his place to interfere with Georgia’s state government. In the case of the tariff, he conversely insisted that the states could not decide what is in their best interests when it came to international trade. But despite any apparent hypocrisy, this contrast did not arise from coincidence. The actions of the Jackson administration, such as the bank veto and the Native American removal policy were both indicators that he believed, in order for individual liberty to exist and the country to stay united, the American people and

To achieve is goal he implemented the Indian Removal Act where the American Government uprooted the native Americans living in Jackson’s way and moved them west because they felted that they were only wasting the land. Andrew Jackson twisted the meaning of the act by proclaiming that it was to help the indians regain people since the United States would no longer bother them. The Cherokee Indians decided that there were not going to move from their homes and sacred land, therefore they sured the United States, and the Supreme Court ended up siding with the Natives. Andrew Jackson however ignored the court ruling and forced the indians to move anyways. He ignored the president of checks and balances and respecting the power of the supreme court that the previous six presidents followed; Jackson thought he could do anything that he wanted since he was the president of the country, therefore he ruled like a monarchy, and he was the King. By moving the Indians west, he forced thousands to march 116 days across the United States carrying all of their possession in harsh climates. 4,000 people died on this journey and many more were inquired. Jackson ignored all the other branches of the government just to get to do want he wanted. The system of checks and balances was established in American government in 1787 to ensure that one person will not assume too much political power. This system had been followed by every president starting with Washington, but Jackson ignored these checks and just went straight to his ideas, and would not accept alternate solutions to his problems or plans. He ran the nation like a monarchy where he could do whatever he wants, therefore he deserves the nickname King

Jackson overuses his veto power and completely disregards the constitution (Document 3). Consequently he is trying to overrule the government and make his own position more powerful this could have been the start of a dictatorship. The fact that he is trying to weaken the government is unconstitutional and why he had the cartoon drawn of him as a king stomping on the constitution. Andrew Jackson was a liar and corrupt politician on how he tried to run how things in the United States of America.

Despite the tribes’ development of schools, farming, and laws, Jackson refused Thomas Jefferson’s ideas of Indian assimilation. In the first case of Johnson v. M’Intosh in 1823, it was decided that Indians did not own, but only occupied the land. In Cherokee Nation v. Georgia in 1831, it was concluded that Indians had no rights because they were not citizens. However, in the case of Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that Indians could hold a different political identity, but the final jurisdiction was given to Jackson, who decided to remove the Indians. Jackson disregarded the Supreme Court’s decision and chose to give sovereignty to the federal government instead of state to further his desires for increased land and uprooting of Indians. In 1832, the head of the Bank of the United States, Nicholas Biddle, wanted a twenty-year charter extension for the bank. Jackson opposed the “Monster Bank” that controlled an excessive amount of political power for an economically privileged monopoly. In Jackson’s veto statement he says, “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes… Equality of

Andrew Jackson and the Economy In present time former president Andrew Jackson is not quite seen as the greatest man ever. Many of called him a lunatic or even a monster. “Jackson’s unpardonable sins include building his wealth on the backs of slave labor, massacring Native Americans, and trampling the Supreme Court’s rulings to send the Cherokee to their doom on the Trail of Tears” (Whaples 545). Jackson by all means is not a saint, he has murdered many people throughout his life time.

Andrew Jackson, the seventh President of the United States, was a very significant leader, but one who is mostly forgotten. Some might say President Jackson set the foundation for the government established today, but many overlook his leadership skills and how he ruled as a monarch. Jackson ruled as a sovereign head of state, also considered a king, during his 8-year reign. We can see President Jackson depicted as a king in the cartoon that appeared in the election of 1832 (Library of Congress). This election took place after Jackson’s first term as President, the artist must have realized the tyrannical rule the U.S. was under and wanted to show the New World what kind of ruler was to ensue if he were to be re-elected

Andrew Jackson was a volatile, temperamental, and violent individual responsible for the perpetuation of genocide. He believed in and asserted his own will as he wished and often wielded power unconstitutionally to further his authoritarian agenda. Additionally, he was an active and willing participant in slavery and the accompanying dehumanization of racism that surrounded the idea of black people being property. The exertion of barbarous tactics with the military might he commanded resulted in gruesome brutalities carried out in the name of white supremacy and American exceptionalism. Because of his deplorable character and disrespect for constitutional rights as well as his ruthless and destructive treatment of black people and indigenous Americans, Andrew Jackson is unfit and highly inappropriate for representing the United States on its currency.