How Did Christian Teachings Affect The Creation Of Human Rights

Human rights seem to be one of the most undervalued rights that people are given. Although not tangible, or even visible, in the end they are one of the most significant aspects of life (Universal 1). They keep us civil. As the

What is a Right? Is it an inalienable individual moral or legal code, a fundamentally collective moral or legal code, or could it be, that a right is the sovereignty to act without the permission of others and, as such, doesn’t it carry the concept that by doing so you may not infringe on another’s sovereignty? These questions reflect the conflict societies; in current years, face in respects to Human Rights. This is not to say, that societies are not able to overcome these issues, and that civilisations; current and ancient, have produced documents that have defied the impression that human rights are a new entity.

The battle for liberty has been fought on different scales with the beginning of thousands of revolutions in the history. The ideal liberty is an ultimate goal that inflames the minds of many people who yearn for individual freedom. In all these struggles, the definition of liberty is not the same for different people. According to the text, “the idea of liberty has played a powerful role in the history of Western society and culture, but the meaning and understanding of liberty has undergone continual change and interpretation.” For example in the Roman world, liberty meant the condition of being a free man. In the Middle Ages, liberty meant having special privileges or rights. However, the idea of liberty under religious dimension was rather new. Martin Luther King had interpreted another important foundation of liberty in his treatise On Christian Liberty: the important of faith and Scripture to Christian life.

The declaration has served as a model for many domestic constitutions, laws, regulations, and policies that are aimed at protecting fundamental human rights (Hannum 145). For the purpose of this paper, there are three essential aspects of the human rights theory outlined in the UDHR. First, Article 3 grants all humans the right to life stating, “everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of a person.” Second, Article 5 states that “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” This right to safety alludes to the negative rights of a human, which grants the moral right that someone remain unharmed or “left alone.” Third, the UDHR argues in favor of the preservation of the human dignity. The document states that an increased awareness of “dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women… have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom” (The United Nations). The belief of human dignity within this document is strongly influenced by Kantian ethics, which believes that humans are their own ends, not the means to the end, and possess intrinsic value (Kant 36). In arguing for human dignity, the UDHR acknowledges the transcendent value of a human and his or her rights as more than just a body and more as a soul. Since publication,

The word “Islam,” when translated, means to submit to the will of God and to abide to his law that is written out in the book of the Quran. Considering this definition of the religion and the strong devotion that the followers of Islam have for their religion, the idea of human rights is one that questions the validity of their historical values. In the past ten years, there have been countless stories in the news regarding practices and actions by Islamic followers who by law of their religion, were acting accordingly, but under the scope of human rights, were committing crimes against humanity. The writers, Heiner Bielefeldt and Zehra Arat, present strong arguments when addressing whether or not Islam is inherently compatible or incompatible

It is very hard to talk about human rights since it is such a broad, personal and difficult topic. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights) Human rights are fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being and which are inherent in all human beings regardless of their nation, location, language, religion, ethnic origin or any other status. From a Christian standpoint I believe that our only right is to be tormented for our sinful nature as human beings. Human rights from a Christian world view are rights that were given to us for being created in the image of God. From this standpoint, the only rights that we have is the right to reproduce, the right to

The rule of human pride, as a general certification that individuals have the most astounding worth, does not itself have a history, on the grounds that an all inclusive explanation is intended as far as possible neither in space nor in time. Be that as it may, the thought of human nobility has a history in so far as it has been thought to depend on different things and hence been represented in different ways. The expression 'human respect' appears to rise rather gradually from a connection where the expression "poise" is utilized as a part of energy about the significance of human people. 1 But then, inside of the Human Rights convention spilling out of this archive, the term of 'human pride' is always used to express the essential instinct from which human rights continue. It is implied as the fundamental standard whereupon human rights are comprehended to rest. It is said to be characteristic in every last individual, furthermore to be unavoidable.

There is a common belief that everyone should have their own rights and freedom towards anything in their life, under a given law and ethics. Freedom to express and to survive have become a standard of living of any human kind. Those standards are inherently planted in any human being and being passed to their inheritance. These rights, as the time passes by, have been expanded and developed into higher and more moderate levels of rights, as given that people have been always seeking for a greater freedom in their own countries and societies. This eager desire for freedom is considered human nature or some sorts, but in certain region with a certain cultures, the ideas of freedom often considered as a false conduct. It was stated that “in the face of mounting tensions between different human rights concerns some observers even assume an abstract antagonism exists between freedom of religion or belief and certain other human rights, such as freedom of expression, gender equality, or LGBTI-rights.” (Bielefeldt 3).

The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background

In the perspective of Christian theology speaks of human rights, can be seen through the two sides, namely: a) Reviewing from the point of faith about what, why and how human right are universally applicable to all people in all places, and b) Laying these efforts within the framework of the joint efforts of all mankind to seek the best for everyone and everyone in accordance with their fundamental rights as human beings. Human Rights are one thing; the formulation of Human Rights is one

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” These opening words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights express a concept of man which underpins the framework of human rights embodied in the Universal Declaration and the two international covenants of Human Rights. Western political traditions is a concept that it derives from, is in harmony with moral and social teachings to be found in many other traditions and patterns of belief.

When we look at it from this perspective we can see that human beings are in communion

The origen and the content of human rights, as they are presented by the Declaration of 1948, belong to a concrete cultural and political tradition, that is, the Western,liberal, individualistic and democratic tradition. But such

The advancement of human rights is a wonderful procedure in the Post-World War II worldwide law. Human rights experienced an extremely powerful change taking after 1945 as a consequence of the monstrous infringement of human rights occurring amid the Second World War. The following sixty years were set apart by the advancement of refined worldwide human rights settlements. General human rights continuously ascended to the global level and joined the club of subjugation and work rights.

The relationship among Islam and human rights shapes a significant feature of modern international human rights debates. In present international events there is more relevant topics made about Islam than in international law discourse. Professor Abdullahi An-Na'im is a scholar on this topic who have written journals and books related to this subject. Muslims support that governments have a responsibility to enforce law. In Islam the people are not independent; God alone is sovereign. Human rights, therefore, are to be enforced only as they reflect divine law. Rights approved by God in the Koran are seen as unquestionable. There is a major similarity between the rights proclaimed through international law. But where there is a difference, then Islamic law is to be obeyed. On the other hand, few Muslims argue that the standards of Islam encourage gender equality, but governments that have required effecting Islamic law have distinguished between the rights of men and women. Moreover, Islamic teaching justifies this distinction by arguing that men and women have rights equal with their different roles and responsibilities in society.