preview

How Did Daniel Defoe's Death Affect Society

Good Essays
Open Document

“A dreadful plague in London was In the year sixty-five, Which swept an hundred thousand souls Away; yet I alive (Defoe 159).” This cry by H.F. is a fascinating statement of a survivor of the 1665 Plague in London. The distribution of burdens in the book was unequal. Personally, Daniel Defoe was not as impacted as society was as a whole. The intervention of government is supported as effective but the aftermath of the events reveals the standards that were perpetuated during the plague were not established as a permanent social institute.
INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE
In his accounts, Daniel Defoe was relatively removed at a personal level from the chaos that surrounded him. “…that I would trust in God with my safety and health, was the strongest repulse …show more content…

“...for people that were infected and near their end, and delirious also, would run to those pits, wrapt in blankets or rugs and throw themselves in, and, as they said, bury themselves,” (Defoe 38). The reaction of society to the rumor and then presence of the plague was detrimental to the containment of the plague. The effect of the plague resulted in a progression of mixed reactions that Defoe details in his journal. As Defoe accounts, “…I mean such as had received the contagion, and had it really upon them, and in their blood, yet did not show the consequences of it in their countenances; nay, even were not sensible of it themselves… these breathed death in every place…” (123). In his examiner position, Defoe mentions, “The methods also in private families…used to have concealed the distemper and to have concealed the persons being sick , would have been such that the distemper would sometimes have seized a whole family before any visitors or examiners could have known of it,” (117). London society and surrounding communities did not understand the biological originator for the plague and as a response to their confusion, they relied on unfounded outlets, “…they ran to conjurers and witches, and all sorts of deceivers, to know what should become of them (who fed their fears, and kept them always alarmed and awake on purpose …show more content…

“...the charity of the rich, as well in the city and suburbs as from the country, was so great that, in a word, a prodigious number of people who must otherwise inevitably have perished for want as well as sickness were supported and subsisted by it…” (Defoe 135). After the plague came to an end, Defoe also offered a contrast to this societal standard with, “…the morals of the people declined from this very time; that the people, hardened by the danger they had been in, like seamen after a storm is over, were more wicked and more stupid, more bold and hardened, in their vices and immoralities than they were before…” (147). The plague culminated in a interesting phenomenon of compassion and tolerance from many English communities but that equal leveling of social classes was not an enduring consequence of the Bubonic Plague, it was an exception to the rule. After the plague had passed over London, the people returned to their normal class structure and what good conduct transpired during the Bubonic Plague was

Get Access