A comparative analysis of two works by 20th and 21st century artists, Edgar Degas and John Bramblitt, where a discussion of their lives, their techniques and of course their works comes into focus. One of the main comparisons between these two artists is how visual impairments in both their cases affected their works. Whilst Degas’s works became more hurried and quick although not losing his precision, Bramblitt’s work still remained patient and calculated.
Dancers ca. 1900 by Degas is a study drawing of what was later to be Dancers VI. It portrays three women dancing, although one seems to be centrally placed and in focus with two other women behind her dancing. This portrait of dancing women, is a draft done in pastels, with the expert mixing of various other materials such as gouache, tempera. This is attributed to the experimental nature of Edgar Degas’s methods and techniques of creating his works. The lines are not sharp and crisp as you would expect in a typical impressionist’s work and yet there is the subtle detailed definition such as the
…show more content…
The first I used primarily with oil paints. Because oil paints are made from different substances they have a viscosity and texture that varies slightly from color to color. By adding medians to the pain such as Liquin and paint thinners I can alter the way the paint feels even more. For example: Titanium White is very thick like toothpaste while Ivory Black is fairly runny - more like oil. By adding a little thinner you can make it even more so. In order to mix a gray halfway between white and black you simply mix for a texture that is halfway between the thick and thin paints. This is actually a very precise way of mixing color because your sense of touch is extremely adept at sensing subtle changes in texture. With practice it becomes even more so.” (Bramblitt,
Their dancers connect with the dance tradition embodying feelings of existential human anguish and references to specific geographic places, dancing focused on surreal situations, body use and the relationships between stage and
The early work of Carl Milles was Two Girls Dancing in 1917. The sculpture shows two women poised on tiptoe in a turning movement. He was enthusiastic about free dance, which was developed at that time. He attended many performances in Paris and Stockholm. So, he sculpted two dancing women. He was interested in the concept of turning and lacking gravity when he created this sculpture because dancing meant the turning movement and the dancer lost contact with the ground momentarily. And later his
always been known for the risky and powerful movements which are often why dancers retire from the company. The dancer’s movements were often very intense and emotive, such as the “throws” across the stage in which the dancers would, almost violently, launch themselves across the stage in different forms (leaps, falls and flips to name a few). Another section where the movements were emotive is where the dancers were thrusting their hips in different positions to perhaps show sexuality in “self”.
Sol LeWitt was a pioneer in Modern Art. He was a father to Minimal and Conceptual art styles, both of which have a huge impact on much of the art done today. If not for his family, however, he would never have become such a huge impact. DeWitt’s mother took him to art classes at Wadsworth Atheneum as a child, which led to him receiving a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree at Syracuse University in 1949. We have Sol’s mother to thank for his influence on art today, as it was her who got him to take classes for it in the first place.
The next minute the man pushed with his legs the woman as they were getting into an argument. The music “God Help the Girl” complimented the dance with its quick beat. Another interesting part of the dance was when the two dancers sat around the table as most people in the world do during dinner time. Moreover, the man put his legs on the table and as he was waiting for dinner to be served. This reminded me of how many cultures around the world are patriarchy oriented where the men are the bread makers and the women’s role is to take care of the children and all the house work. However, the woman’s costume was a representation of how women in the twenty-first century have grown to become career and goal oriented and not settling for the “Homemaker” position that society is used to. Another interesting part of the dance “Folie a’Deux” reminded me of something I learned in Dance 1010 class and it was a dance similar to the Lindy Hop. The duet came to the front of the stage, between the table and the couch, very close to each other and started hopping and moving very quickly. However, their upper bodies were also moving and their arms were flopping back-and-fourth. Overall, the dance moves were concentrated in the middle and upper space. Their bodies were straight while stepping heavy on the floor turned towards the audience. The dancers made eye contact with the public but also
The dancers run out onto the stage and form two straight lines consisting of three girls in the front and three girls in the back. As the piece progresses this formation does not vary other than to switch lines. Once on stage, the music finishes the introduction and the happy, lively, carnival type music begins. The dancers throw confetti onto the audience members and begin their variations of shimmying, hip thrusting, being overly dramatic and movements that were highly sexualized. Each movement seems as though it was choreographed in order to make the dancer’s body shake specifically within the bosom and the buttock. The dancers’ facings were both front and back displaying the entirety of the female body. Within the clip at 28 seconds the camera focuses only on the female’s buttock as it its shaking from side to side in time with the music. By 37 seconds colored streamers fly down from the stage as the dancers walked dramatically in unison
The dancers’ movements throughout the performance seem to challenge and uphold gender binaries at the same time. At the beginning, when only female dancers are present their movements are agentive, strong, quick, and athletic-characteristics not usually allowed for female dancers. Their movements are similar to the wild and physical movement of Louise
In this essay the following contemporary painters are going to be examined: Marlene Dumas, Wendy Sharpe, and Euan Macleod. Besides, I will analyse the ways in which these artists engages in dialogue with current social or cultural concerns, focusing on specific ways that the medium influences the effectiveness of visual communication.
A great artist once wrote, “If you hear a voice within you say 'you cannot paint,' then by all means paint, and that voice will be silenced”. This artist was Vincent van Gogh, soon to be an appraised artist known all around the world for his works, such as Starry Night. He is one of the very first artists of the post-impressionist style than is now adored in every continent. However, there is much more to the man than one painting. Creating a full timeline that stretches beyond Gogh’s life, this paper will discuss the life of Vincent van Gogh and the impression he made on the world.
While the painters after the Impressionism period were collectively called the “Post-Impressionists,” the label is quite reductive. Each artist had their own unique style, from Seurat’s pointillism to Signac’s mosaic-like divisionism, Cezanne, Émile Bernard, and others. These artists were all connected in that they were reacting to the aesthetics of Impressionism. Two of the more influential painters from this movement were Vincent van Gogh and Paul Gauguin, who aimed to connect with viewers on a deeper level by access Nature’s mystery and meaning beyond its superficial, observable level. However, each artist’s approach to achieving this goal was different. In close examination of Vincent van Gogh’s Self-Portrait (Dedicated to Paul Gauguin) and Paul Gauguin’s Self-Portrait with Portrait of Émile Bernard (Les misérables), one may clearly see the two artists’ contrasting styles on display.
I will be comparing two famous paintings by two very famous Artists in two different periods of time. The Bath done by Edgar Degas a distorted Japanese-style perspective in Pastel painted in 1886 and Grande Odalisque by a young artist Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres in the style of exotic Romanticism Oil on canvas from 1814. These famous artists Degas and Jean slightly differ from other artist for their personalities and views can be seen through their paintings. Both works of art depict beautiful women in different ways posing in different manners yet these paintings are similar in many ways. These paintings vary through the use of many different mediums and techniques.
Chuck Close is well known for his art, but he is also known for overcoming his ailments and concerning his dreams of being an artist. In this paper I will discuss his early life,and his later years. Chuck Close is an abstract artist who has severe dyslexia, facial blindness and neuromuscular(affect the nerves that control your voluntary muscles also known as the ones your control). Chuck has many disabilities, but despite these listed and the ones not listed he still creates facial abstract artwork.
“What I hear is valueless; only what I see is living, and when I close my eyes my vision is even more powerful.” This quote from the metaphysical artist, Giorgio de Chirico, can be relayed to his audience visually through his artwork. During his years as a novice artist, Chirico gained inspiration from the surreal scenarios in the works by European Symbolist artists. Along with these Symbolist artists, Chirico’s pieces of art were influenced by the philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzche. Both philosophers saw art as a lens for life and a way of responding to the suffering that describes the distinctive nature of humanity. The philosophy of these men encouraged Chirico to uncover the true reality beneath everyday objects through
Edgar Degas’ Four Dancers (1899) on a canvas, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. The composition accentuates the shapes and arms of the dancers with bold dark lines in dramatic lighting on the dancers through green and orange tones. The reflection of color on the dancers’ backs is juxtaposed with that of the set design’s painted background. Notably, the dancer nearest to the front of the painting makes a “trapezoid” shape with her lifted arms. The two dancers next to her are perfecting other versions of the same angle of the arms. Oddly, each dancer is drawn in an almost perfectly symmetrical manner as if they are permutation of the same person. They all appear to be of the same size as well. The dancer behind them has an extended arm, which helps to frame the other dancers by creating a rectangular frame, encasing the dancers in the painting and bringing together all the elements of the painting as a whole.
In A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Stephen Dedalus defines beauty and the artist's comprehension of his/her own art. Stephen uses his esthetic theory with theories borrowed from St. Thomas Aquinas and Plato. The discourse can be broken down into three main sections: 1) A definitions of beauty and art. 2) The apprehension and qualifications of beauty. 3) The artist's view of his/her own work. I will explain how the first two sections of his esthetic theory relate to Stephen. Furthermore, I will argue that in the last section, Joyce is speaking of Stephen Dedalus and A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man as his art.